Compute with the Surface Book

When discussing Ultrabooks, the word Compute doesn’t get thrown around very often, and for good reason. Even the MacBook Pro 13 only comes with Intel Iris graphics (no GT3e yet) and although Intel’s GPUs have been a priority over the last couple of generations, just like in gaming there is only so much you can do when your TDP is shared with the processor.

With Surface Book, there is more of an opportunity here. If you opt for the model with the NVIDIA GPU, you gain access to CUDA, which is NVIDIA’s parallel computing platform. Quite a few applications that need strong parallel processing have CUDA available as an option. Adobe, for instance, has CUDA support in many of their professional products like Photoshop, After Effects, Premier Pro, and more. NVIDIA lists hundreds of applications on their site which can benefit from GPU compute power, and there are also OpenCL applications as well which would benefit from the more powerful dGPU.

Expectations need to be put in check of course, because the GPU available in the Surface Book is not a workstation class GPU, so we shall see how it compares on these types of tasks. This is not an area where we have an extensive database of other devices, and normally compute is not a heavy focus for Ultrabook reviews, but I feel the Surface Book may find a niche with content creators so it’s worth examining.

Compubench

From the makers of GFXBench is Compubench, and like GFXBench, there are a number of tests which can be completed with either the CPU only, or by choosing a GPU.

CompubenchCL Face Detection

CompubenchCL TV-L1 Optical Flow

CompubenchCL Ocean Surface Simulation

CompubenchCL Particle Simulation 64K

CompubenchCL TRex

CompubenchCL Video Composition

CompubenchCL Bitcoin Mining

The results are a bit mixed. Some of the tests respond very well to having the NVIDIA GPU, but some of the others don’t get as much of a benefit. But where the GPU helps, it can help a lot. Several of the tasks are 50% faster, and the Video Composition sub-test is 212% faster on the discrete GPU.

Agisoft Photscan

This software performs photogrammetric processing of images, and it has an option to use the GPU or just standalone with the CPU. Of the entire benchmark, only one section actually leverages the GPU functions so that test has been highlighted.

Agisoft Photoscan Stage 2

Even the one accelerated test still only shows a 5% decrease in time with the GPU being used. This highlights that even though a task may be accelerated with the GPU, the overall impact may not always be what you are expecting, since not all tasks can be done in parallel.

Using the Surface Book NVIDIA GPU for Compute

There is no doubt that if you are performing work that supports CUDA, the NVIDIA option on the Surface Book is going to make an impact. The question of course is how much. Applications such as those from Adobe do leverage CUDA, but it’s not for all tasks. This is kind of the issue with considering the GPU for compute. If you are someone who uses Adobe Premiere on the go, and need something smaller than a typical workstation class notebook, the GPU is going to help out, but since it doesn’t get leveraged for all tasks, it is very dependent on the exact task that you are performing.

GPU Gaming Performance The PixelSense Display
Comments Locked

249 Comments

View All Comments

  • tipoo - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    It does seem Panos wasn't entirely full of it for the "twice as fast" as the Macbook Pro 13" comment though, if taken on the GPU side alone. Which he should have said, but still, a lot of us have to eat crow :P
  • ToTTenTranz - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    The Macbook Pro isn't using Skylake yet, or a version with EDRAM, so that comparison isn't accurate.
  • tipoo - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    No, but he was comparing it to the currently shipping one, which is really all we have to go on until it comes with Skylake.

    I'd love to see the MBP match this GPU performance if possible with GT3e.
  • zepi - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    15w SKU's will suffer from lack of TDP regardless of the eDRAM or not. However, the 28w SKU's with eDRAM might actually reach some interesting performance levels in higher end laptops that choose integrate it.
  • tipoo - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    Yeah that's what I'm thinking. The MBP 13" with some eDRAM strapped in, that would be interesting to me. Maybe enough to sell my 15", downgrade, and pocket the difference.
  • id4andrei - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    Specially on a mac, Iris CPUs are terribly inefficient from a battery power perspective in anything that needs graphics. Check arstechnica webgl tests. The mac suffers the most. Apparently the CPU runs at full TDP even when only the GPU is needed.
  • ToTTenTranz - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    I second this comment. We're yet to see how the Skylake's, 15W GT3e behaves, and it would be very interesting to compare gaming performance between the Core i7 Surface Pro 4 and the Surface Book with dGPU. Mainly because the theoretical performance of both is very similar.
  • B3an - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    Where's the comparison to Apple hardware in the benchmarks? Why not have this? I don't want to hear some stupid excuse like Anand use to have, like hurrr durrr different markets. Please update the benchmarks with this info.
  • tipoo - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    Look at the XPS 13 for a ballpark of the MBP 13. Intel GPUs don't get much better until they strap on eDRAM.
  • tipoo - Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - link

    Actually, even better, read the CPU page

    "For comparisons, I’ve sampled several similar devices for the graphs, and if anyone would like to compare the Surface Book against anything we’ve tested, please use the Bench link at the top of the page. At the launch of the Surface Book, Microsoft compared it to the 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro."

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now