From the outside, the Surface Pro 3 and Surface Pro 4 displays are deceptively similar. Yes, the new model is slightly larger at 12.3-inches but has the same 3:2 aspect ratio as the 12-inch display in the Surface Pro 3. But what the form factor hides is all of the work that has gone into improving the display at both the panel level and the overall display stack. In fact Microsoft has consistently improved on their displays, starting with their zero air gap laminated displays on the older Surface Pro models. So what changes do we have in store over the Surface Pro 3 display with a new panel?

The most obvious change is that the new display has a much higher resolution. The Surface Pro 3 was 2160x1440, and for Surface Pro 4 that has jumped up to 2736x1824. It doesn’t look like a huge change, but the new panel has almost two million more pixels and the pixel density jumped up to 267 PPI. You really would have a hard time discerning individual pixels on this panel but if you did they would look like this:

Despite the increase in resolution, Microsoft has stuck with a standard RGB stripe which is important because if they had gone with PenTile RGBW it is unlikely they would be able to achieve their other goals for this display. Microsoft is aiming for full sRGB coverage on all Surface Pro 4 models with each one being calibrated at the factory. We’ve heard such claims before, but they don’t always pan out, but I’ll get to that in a minute. The importance of factory calibration cannot be overstated. Yes, you can add ICC profiles to Windows to help with color accuracy, but unless you have a 3D lookup table (LUT), this generally only helps grayscale accuracy. Plus, many programs ignore ICC profiles anyway. So having it calibrated with a hardware LUT is the right way to go.

The display is an 8-bit panel, which not only helps Microsoft to hit their sRGB target but improves overall image reproduction. Coincidentally enough, this is especially evident with the new Windows 10 default background, as a 6-bit panel can show a lot of dithering in the smoke around the window whereas the Surface Pro 4 suffers no such indignities.

Another point about this display is that Microsoft is saying it has the thinnest optical stack ever for Surface Pro. This does a couple of things. It obviously lets them make the tablet thinner, but it also helps reduce parallax when using the pen, which is a big part of Surface. But one of the nicest changes is that it makes the display feel like it’s right under your finger. Generally, when I look at a notebook, I see a display that is somewhat sunken in the housing, but with Surface Pro 4 it really feels like it is right at the top. It looks great.

The final point about this display before we move on to testing it is battery life. High pixel density displays are already the single biggest power draw in a notebook or tablet, and moving to a higher density like Microsoft has done here can cause some significant issues with battery life since the backlight needs to be stronger to achieve the same level of brightness. One way to counter that is to use an Indium Gallium Zinc Oxide (IGZO) panel. The IGZO transistors are more transparent than amorphous silicon, and let more light through. Microsoft has gone this route, but in an unexpected way. IGZO panels are traditionally from Sharp, but this is the first IGZO display I have seen from Samsung. Samsung signed a joint partnership with Sharp earlier this year to build IGZO panels and I believe this is the first device to use one.

With the preamble out of the way, let’s dig into testing the display. We use SpectraCal’s CalMAN 5 software suite for display testing, with a custom workflow. For the actual tests, we use an X-Rite i1Display Pro colorimeter for brightness and contrast readings, and an X-Rite i1Pro spectrophotometer for measuring the color accuracy.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

Despite the higher resolution, Microsoft has been able to increase the peak brightness to 377 nits, and at the same time they have also increase black levels. This leads to a much better contrast ratio of 1277:1 on the Surface Pro 4. The display also gets very dim, going all the way down to 12 nits if you need to use it in a dark room. Playing back movies on the Surface Pro 4 I immediately noticed how much better the blacks were and how much more detail I could see because of it in a dark movie.

Grayscale Accuracy

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Display - White Point

The biggest change from the Surface Pro 3 is how much improved the grayscale accuracy is with the Surface Pro 4. Last year’s model had a good saturation profile, but it was let down by inaccurate grayscale performance. The Surface Pro 4 on the other hand has fantastic grayscale, with an average around 1.5. In fact none of the sub-tests exceed 3 dE (the green bar) in our testing, which is the generally considered the cut-off point for visible inaccuracies. As a result the Surface Pro 4 delivers great grayscale accuracy across the board.

The one weakness here for the tablet's display is in its white point. The Surface Pro 3 was already a little blue, and the Surface Pro 4 regresses a bit more white a white point about 800K above ideal.

Saturation Accuracy

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The Surface Pro 4 nails the sRGB gamut. None of the saturation tests got close to the 3 dE level, and the panel itself covers pretty much the entire sRGB color space.

Gretag MacBeth

Display - GMB Accuracy

The GMB test is the most comprehensive. It tests many different colors including flesh tones which are important to a good experience. The Surface Pro 3 was dragged down on this test by its poor grayscale, but the Surface Pro 4 absolutely nails this test. Generally, when averages are under 3 dE like this one, there are still several colors that spike over the dE 3 level, and with the Surface Pro 4 there are only two spikes over 3 dE with both being a shade of orange. Neither spike is much over the visible level though with one being about 3.25 and the other being 3.5. On a test that checks so many colors, this is one of the best results I have seen.

Color Comparator

To get a feel for what the different error levels represent, we have two color comparators. The bottom half is the expected color, and the top half is what the panel produces. Please note that these are relative levels, since any error in your own display will skew the results, but it gives a good look at what the accuracy means and can easily show poor grayscale effects.

Ultimately what we see with the Surface Pro 4 is that Microsoft has taken the display tech and moved it well past the Surface Pro 3. Color accuracy is fantastic, whites are whiter, blacks are blacker, and the panel almost feels like it is flush with the surface of the tablet. Microsoft put a lot of tech into the entire Surface Pro 4 display stack, including the panel itself and the custom PixelSense digitizer which handles both touch and pen. After several years of almost getting the display right, with Surface Pro 4 it looks like they have finally succeeded.

Graphics and NAND Performance Battery Life and Charge Time


View All Comments

  • Dawgmatix - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    Any data on the battery life of the core m3 version? With 4.5w tdp I would expect better battery life than the I5. Reply
  • Brett Howse - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    That's a common misconception. I would not expect the battery life to be significantly different except maybe slightly better on the heavy workload. The maximum TDP is 4.5 W it's not a measurement of how much power the CPU draws most of the time. I've seen many people make this same mistake. At the end of the day, it's the same CPU architecture and will likely be very similar in idle power draw. Reply
  • Luc K - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    Actually I thought AnandTech earlier commented that it should get better battery life under light load. Idle TDP is significantly lower. I'd be interested to see some test results as well on that. Reply
  • extide - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    No, the iidle TDP is going to be almost the same. It's the same silicon guys...

    What Brett said is exactly correct. There will be some difference in battery life under heavy CPU load, but that's about it.

    Also really the battery draw is dominated by the screen, not the CPU.
  • Walkop - Sunday, October 25, 2015 - link

    It isn't dominated by the screen when you have a 15w chip under heavy load. Reply
  • Dawgmatix - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    I agree that in theory what you are saying is true. What I am looking for is data on what happens in practice. Modern chips are so complex in reality that I find it best to measure what they do rather than think about what they should do. Reply
  • Strunf - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    It works at lower frequency among other optimizations. It should offer better battery life in real world use. Reply
  • Luc K - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    Ignore my idle TDP comment since that was Intel quoted average. I cannot find much info on TDP characteristics yet. Still should get better battery life but only a test could tell. Hopefully we'll see that here in future post... Reply
  • Cerif27 - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    I would love to know that as well as for the i7 version. I have an i7 preordered but if the battery life is even worse I might downgrade. Reply
  • randomlinh - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    Are there any NAND numbers on the 128GB options (or even just each storage option)? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now