The last time we got a chance to do a full review the Acer Aspire S7, it was back in 2013. At the time it was a big step up from Acer, and the Ivy Bridge based S7 came with one of the slimmest and lightest bodies of that era. That was 2013. Anand also used the Acer Aspire S7-392 as his test machine for the Haswell-U launch in 2014, getting a chance to see the second generation Haswell version of the Aspire S7.

In 2015, the competition in the Ultrabook space has not sat idly by. One thing is for certain in the technology sector: no matter what kind of lead you have, if you stand still, you will be passed. This maxim keeps all hardware vendors on their toes, and for Acer and the Aspire S7 family is no exception.

Diving into matters then, today we're going to be taking a look at the latest generation of the Acer Aspire S7. For the 2015 model, Acer has shipped us the top end version with the Intel Core i7-5500U processor, and along with the processor update, the Acer also offers a 2560x1440 display upgrade from the base 1920x1080 model.

The review model I’ll be looking at today features 8 GB of RAM, the aforementioned Core i7-5500U processor, the 1920x1080 resolution display, and a 256 GB SSD which is 2 x 128 GB in RAID 0. Acer calls this version the S7-393-7451, and despite the updated internals, Acer has kept the styling and form factor practically identical to the original S7 reviewed back in 2013. The model being tested lists for $1299 on the Acer site.

Since this model was first introduced prior to the release of WIndows 10, Acer still sells this S7 with Windows 8.1. But since that is eligible for the free upgrade to Windows 10, they were happy to have me upgrade it to Windows 10 for this review. This will then be the first laptop reviewed with Windows 10, but most of our testing unchanged from 8.1 to 10 with the exception of our battery life tests which were moved to use Microsoft’s new Edge browser rather than Internet Explorer.

Acer Aspire S7-393
  As Tested, Core i7-5500U, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD, 1920x1080 Display
Processor Intel Core i5-5200U (2C/4T, 2.2-2.7GHz, 3MB L3, 14nm, 15w)

Intel Core i7-5500U (2C/4T, 2.4-3.0GHz, 4MB L3, 14nm, 15w)
Memory Dual-Channel 8 GB DDR3L-1600
Graphics Intel HD 5500 (24 EU, 300-900 MHz on i5, 300-950 Mhz on i7)
Display 13.3" 1920x1080 IPS
Optional 2560x1440 IPS
Storage 256 GB SSD (2 x 128 GB RAID 0)
Networking Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (802.11ac, 2x2:2, 866Mpbs Max, 2.4 and 5GHz)
Bluetooth 4.0
Audio Stereo Speakers (downfiring) 1 watt x 2
Realtek with Dolby Digital Plus
Battery 46 Wh Battery
45 Watt A/C Adapter
Right Side USB 3.0
DisplayPort
Headset Jack
HDMI
Left Side USB 3.0
DC In
Power Button
SD Card Slot
Dimensions 322 x 222 x 13 mm (12.7 x 8.8 x 0.51 inches)
Weight 1.31 kg (2.9 lbs)
Extras 720p Webcam
Backlit Keyboard
Dual-Torque Hinge
Pricing $1389 As Tested on Amazon
$1299 on Acer.com

There are no surprises with the Acer S7. Wireless is provided by Intel’s Wireless-AC 7265 card, the battery is a 47 Wh model, and it falls pretty much in-line with other Ultrabooks as far as specifications. One change that Acer has over most is RAID 0 on the drives. I don’t find this to be a benefit at all in most workloads, and would rather Acer spent the extra cost to provide one faster drive. Acer is also lacking in connectivity options with just two USB ports available. Most Ultrabooks find room from three, but Acer has gone with a mini DisplayPort and an HDMI video output. That seems overkill since the HDMI could be passed through DisplayPort freeing up room for a third USB port. Acer does still find room for a SD card slot which is always appreciated.

Design
POST A COMMENT

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Monday, October 05, 2015 - link

    I just had a Mushkin PCIe SSD fail entirely because one of the four 128GB SSD's failed.

    RAID 0 is inherently unreliable because you are increasing the failure points.
    Reply
  • Ethos Evoss - Wednesday, October 07, 2015 - link

    u such stupid whinner ..who don't think Reply
  • Ethos Evoss - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    you stupid idiot you can turn raid off if you don't want it and you can carry on using your '' plain" disk
    What a bunch of retards here really
    Reply
  • Teknobug - Tuesday, October 06, 2015 - link

    lol RAID 0 on the same drive? What the Reply
  • Morawka - Monday, October 05, 2015 - link

    i disagree, your getting double the write and double the read speed. Copying large files (movies, ISO's, etc..) will see great benefit.

    it's a stop gap solution because it does'nt have PCIE SSD
    Reply
  • Lolimaster - Monday, October 05, 2015 - link

    Copy to what?

    Copy over an aldready slow wifi/ethernet? Copy to another SSD using USB 3.0? SSD's RAID 0 makes no sense unless you have a workstation/high end PC for heavy video editing.

    If you have an SSD Raid 0 you'll only see the speed copying to another SSD Raid 0 o m.2 pci-e SSD.

    It's an ultrabook, any kind of speed you get is already bottlenecked by the ultrabook itself (slow external connectivity.
    Reply
  • Morawka - Monday, October 05, 2015 - link

    copy to the same drive. ie: duplicating files

    Converting MKV's, Ripping Blu Ray, 1080P Video Scratch Disk, Adobe Bridge Scratch Disk, 4K Video Scratch Disk and Copying.

    There are tons of uses
    Reply
  • Kristian Vättö - Tuesday, October 06, 2015 - link

    It's an ultrabook, not a mobile workstation. If you plan on doing a lot of video work an ultrabook is a wrong choice in the first place due to the limited processing power. Reply
  • Ethos Evoss - Wednesday, October 07, 2015 - link

    u naive stupid kiddo troll.. if u don't know nothing bout computers stop embarrassing yourself
    if u have no idea how to simply unRAID two storage drives then go back to school mento
    Reply
  • Athlex - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    You're partly right. The S7 uses a proprietary double-sided mSATA SSD (Kingston P/N SMS"R"...) which has an identical footprint to a regular mSATA SSD. It's basically two 64/128GB SSDs in a software RAID on the same physical PCB. Fortunately, the mSATA slot can work with traditional mSATA cards if you want to get more capacity or ditch the weird RAID setup. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now