Encryption Support Evaluation

Consumers looking for encryption capabilities can opt to encrypt a iSCSI share with TrueCrypt or some in-built encryption mechanism in the client OS. However, if requirements dictate that the data must be shared across multiple users / computers, relying on encryption in the NAS is the best way to move forward. Most NAS vendors use the industry-standard 256-bit AES encryption algorithm. One approach is to encrypt only a particular shared folder while the other approach is to encrypt the full volume. Netgear supports only volume-level encryption. In addition, a USB drive (into which the key is written at the time of volume creation) needs to be attached to the unit for the encrypted volume to remain / be mounted.

On the hardware side, encryption support can be in the form of specialized hardware blocks in the SoC (common in ARM / PowerPC based NAS units). In x86-based systems, accelerated encryption support is dependent on whether the AES-NI instruction is available on the host CPU. The Annapurna Labs SoC has hardware crypto engines that enable minimal hit in performance with encrypted volumes.

HD Video Playback - Encrypted CIFS

2x HD Playback - Encrypted CIFS

4x HD Playback - Encrypted CIFS

HD Video Record - Encrypted CIFS

HD Playback and Record - Encrypted CIFS

Content Creation - Encrypted CIFS

Office Productivity - Encrypted CIFS

File Copy to NAS - Encrypted CIFS

File Copy from NAS - Encrypted CIFS

Dir Copy to NAS - Encrypted CIFS

Dir Copy from NAS - Encrypted CIFS

Photo Album - Encrypted CIFS

robocopy (Write to NAS) - Encrypted CIFS

robocopy (Read from NAS) - Encrypted CIFS

The performance of the encrypted volume is easily the best amongst all the ARM-based NAS units that have been evaluated so far. The x86-based units in the list above don't have AES-NI, and hence, the ARM-based RN202 easily manages to win out. There is definitely a performance hit compared to unencrypted volumes, and this can only be resolved by going to higher performance platforms./p>

Single Client Performance - CIFS & iSCSI on Windows Multi-Client CIFS Performance for Consumer Workloads
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • mikato - Monday, November 9, 2015 - link

    How can you mention the QNAP TS-231 in the last sentence of the article like
    "Taken in the context of units such as the QNAP TS-231, the $282 diskless pricing of the RN202 is a bit too high for our liking."
    and not mention it anywhere else???? How does the Netgear ReadyNAS RN202 compare to that??

    Argh!
  • rama13 - Friday, June 10, 2016 - link

    It has the worst HELP, FAQ and manual I have ever seen!
    Almost never ever ever I have solved my problem or found my answer from them (or support) and always I have done try and error or just guess to solve the issues! then just ask myself why they have not mentioned this simple solution in just one sentence instead of confusing people and ask you to contact expensive support!!!!!!

    I will never buy any #Netgear products because of this kind of support!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now