Overclocking

Finally, no review of a high-end video card would be complete without a look at overclocking performance.

To get right to the point here, overclockers looking at out of the box overclocking performance are going to come away disappointed. While cooling and power delivery are overbuilt, in other respects the R9 Fury X is very locked down when it comes to overclocking. There is no voltage control at this time (even unofficial), there is no official HBM clockspeed control, and the card’s voltage profile has been finely tuned to avoid needing to supply the card with more voltage than is necessary. As a result the card has relatively little overclocking potential without voltage adjustments.

So what do we get for overclocking?

Radeon R9 Fury X Overclocking
  Stock Overclocked
Boost Clock 1050Mhz 1125MHz
Memory Clock 1Gbps (500MHz DDR) 1Gbps (500MHz DDR)
Max Voltage N/A N/A

Our efforts net us 75MHz, which is actually 25MHz less than what AMD published in their reviewer’s guide. Even 100MHz would lead to artifacting in some games, requiring that we step down to a 75MHz overclock to have a safe and sustainable overclock.

The end result is that the overclocked R9 Fury X runs at 1125MHz core and 1Gbps memory, a 75MHz (7%) increase in the GPU clockspeed and 0% increase in the memory clockspeed. This puts a very narrow window on expected performance gains, as we shouldn’t exceed a 7% gain in any game, and will almost certainly come in below 7% in most games.

OC: Battlefield 4 - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality - 0x MSAA

Our gaming benchmarks find just that. A few percent performance improvement there, a 5% improvement there. Overall we wouldn’t go as far as saying there no reason to overclock, but with such limited gains it’s hardly worth the trouble right now.

True overclocking is going to have to involve BIOS modding, a riskier and warranty-voiding strategy, but one that should be far more rewarding. With more voltage I have little doubt that R9 Fury X could clock higher, though it’s impossible to guess by how much at this time. In any case the card is certainly built for it, as the oversized cooler, high power delivery capabilities, and dual BIOS switch provide all the components necessary for such an overclocking attempt.

Meanwhile HBM is a completely different bag, and while unofficial overclocking is looking promising, as a new technology it will take some time to get a good feel for it and understand just what kind of performance improvements it can deliver. The R9 Fury X is starting out with quite a bit of memory bandwidth right off the bat (512GB/sec), so it may not be bandwidth starved as often as other cards like the R9 290X was.

Power, Temperature, & Noise Final Words
Comments Locked

458 Comments

View All Comments

  • chizow - Friday, July 3, 2015 - link

    While Intel wasn't the underdog in terms of marketshare, they were in terms of technology and performance with the Athlon 64 vs. Pentium 4. Intel had a dog on their hands that they managed to weather the storm with, until they got Conroe'd in 2006. Now, they are down and most likely out, as Zen even if it delivers as promised (40% IPC increase just isn't enough) will take years to gain traction in the CPU market. Time AMD simply does not have, especially given how far behind they've fallen in the dGPU market.
  • nikaldro - Friday, July 3, 2015 - link

    That's 40% over excavator, so about 60%? over vishera.
    If they manage to get good enough IPC on 8 cores, at a good price, they may really make a comeback
  • chizow - Monday, July 6, 2015 - link

    Well, best of luck with this. :)
  • bgo - Friday, July 3, 2015 - link

    Well during the P4 era Intel bribed OEMs to not use Athlon chips, which they later had to pay $1.25bn to AMD for. While one could argue the monetary losses may have been partially made up for, the settlement came at the end of 2009, so too little too late. Intel bought themselves time with their bribes, and that's what really enabled them to weather the storms.
  • chizow - Monday, July 6, 2015 - link

    No, if you read the actual results and AMD's own testimony, they couldn't produce enough chips and offer them at a low enough price to OEMs compared to what Intel was just giving away as subsidies.
  • piiman - Friday, July 3, 2015 - link

    " AMD got beat by the underdog. "

    And that makes them the underdog now.
  • boozed - Thursday, July 2, 2015 - link

    "Mantle is essentially depreciated at this point"

    Deprecated, surely?
  • chrisgon - Thursday, July 2, 2015 - link

    "Which is not say I’m looking to paint a poor picture of the company – AMD Is nothing if not the perineal underdog who constantly manages to surprise us with what they can do with less"

    I think the word you were looking for is perennial. Unless you truly meant to refer to AMD as the taint.
  • ArKritz - Thursday, July 2, 2015 - link

    I think there's about a 50-50 chance of that...
  • ingwe - Thursday, July 2, 2015 - link

    Thanks for the effort that went into this article. I hope you are feeling better.

    In general this article makes me continue to feel sad for AMD.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now