Test setup

Professional testing requires the emulation of real-world situations but with repeatable results; thus, a perfectly controllable test setup and environment are required, especially for comparable results. Testing the thermal performance of any case with a typical real-world setup technically limits the comparability of the results to this setup alone, as an active system interacts with its environment and the change of a single component would alter myriads of variables.

As such, we developed synthetic loads that emulate the thermal output of real systems, which however are passive, steady and quantifiable. As a result, our thermal testing displays the thermal capabilities of the case alone, as if it would have to deal with the entire thermal load by itself, regardless of the system that would be installed inside it. Laboratory data loggers are being used to monitor the PT100 sensors and control the safety relays, which are fully accessible via our custom software. Three such loads have been developed; the ATX version simulates a 200W CPU, 50W VRM, 30W RAM and 4 × 120W GPU card thermal load. Finally, three 3.5" HDD dummy loads have also been created, with each of them converting 30 W of electrical power to thermal, bringing the total thermal load of the ATX test setup up to 850 Watts. As such, the thermal load is immense and only the best of cases will be able to handle it for more than a few minutes. Meanwhile we are also performing a test with a thermal load of 400W, with all of the aforementioned components except the HDD drives at about 42% power, which is more suitable for the majority of cases.

Thermal testing has been performed with all of the case's stock fan operating at maximum speed. Noise testing has been performed with a background noise level of 30.4dB(A). Advanced noise testing is also being performed, in order to assess the ability of the case to dampen the noise of the components installed inside it. This includes the installation of two noise-generating sources (strong fans) inside the case, one positioned approximately over the first expansion slot and one over the CPU area, which generate ≈ 44.2 dB(A) when unobstructed. During the advanced noise test, all stock cooling options of the case are entirely disabled.

Note: As the Fortress FT05 can only host two 3.5" devices, the maximum load of each test configuration is reduced by 30 Watts (minus one HDD dummy load).

Results and discussion

The thermal performance of the SilverStone Fortress FT05 is just a little worse than that of the Raven RV05. This was to be expected, as the sound dampening material on all panels acts as a thermal insulator as well, forcing nearly all of the heat transfer to take place via the airflow. Still, the thermal performance remains fantastic, rivaling that of much larger and fancier products. Even cases with double the volume of the Fortress FT05 are having a hard time competing. For example, the small and cramped Fortress FT05 can maintain about the same GPU temperatures as the massive Corsair 760T. However, this is solely because there are two massive 180mm intake fans supplying ample air directly over the system. If the airflow is blocked for any reason (e.g. messy cable job, dust on the filter, etc.), the thermal performance of the Fortress FT05 plummets.

With the Raven RV05, the 180mm stock cooling fans had the downside of being significantly loud at maximum speed. The same fans are present in the Fortress FT05 but the sound dampening material makes for a notable drop of the sound pressure levels, making the 180mm fans completely inaudible at low speeds. With a maximum of 37.3dB(A), the Penetrator fans are now fairly comfortable for everyday use even at their maximum speed. Considering the airflow of these fans, running them at half the speed will provide more than adequate airflow to a system with a typical CPU and a single GPU.

The sound dampening capabilities of the Fortress FT05 were better than we initially anticipated. As the top of the case is almost entirely perforated, one would expect the noise dampening capabilities to be very low. SilverStone pleasantly surprised us, with the Fortress FT05 reducing the noise of our dummy test source from 44.2dB(A) to 40.9dB(A). It may not seem as an astonishing figure at first but remember that the decibel scale is logarithmic and seemingly small changes can have great real world repercussions. It actually is very good, with a drop of the sound intensity by nearly 54% (2.63×10-8 to 1.23××10-8 Watts per square meter). 

The Interior of the SilverStone Fortress FT05 Final Words and Conclusion
Comments Locked

47 Comments

View All Comments

  • maximumGPU - Friday, June 5, 2015 - link

    i can't decide if i should get this. I'm running an FT02 and it oozes quality, but is getting too large and i have no use for optical drives.
    This looks fantastic, but the extremely cramped space is a turnoff, especially considering i'm running two gpus. Noise is also a big concern for me, and my experience with the AP180 mm fan is that they are definetly not silent, unless you run them at really low speeds.
    My other contender is the H440. Great looks and quiet but alas with much more plastic and inferior cooling.
  • Boffinboy - Friday, June 5, 2015 - link

    I have the exact same dilemma! The trend for AIO cooled graphics cards could solve this. Out of interest, what coolers are you running your graphics cards with? Blower or dual fan?
  • maximumGPU - Friday, June 5, 2015 - link

    dual fan. I know it doesn't sit right witht the vertical cooling, especially in sli, but the new style 0dB coolers are just fantastic when you're not gaming.
  • Boffinboy - Friday, June 5, 2015 - link

    I know some have the fins in vertical orientation and seem to work OK. I originally had some EVGA ACX-style cards, and the fins were horizontal - they performed terribly. I'm due a graphics upgrade and not sure whether to try SLI with dual-fan cards with vertical fins e.g. MSI.
  • maximumGPU - Saturday, June 6, 2015 - link

    yes i run 2 MSI gaming (980) and the cooling is fine, although i wouldn't say it's fantastic. 1 gpu has a delta T of 45, which isn't too bad. the other runs hotter at 55 with a higher gpu fan speed.
  • Boffinboy - Monday, June 8, 2015 - link

    Thanks, that's helpful to know for my next upgrade!
  • Samus - Friday, June 5, 2015 - link

    I've had an FT01 since 2008 and use an FT03 and FT03-mini at work. They ALL ooze quality. It was about time someone dethroned Lian-Li in the aluminum department...

    I'd tried a lot of different cases over the years as I built PC's for friends (and as a MAR member I was getting Windows\Office licenses for education/non-profit super cheap) and other manufactures such as Cooler Master (Praetorian) and Corsair (Obsidian) tried and tried, and while well reviewed, just aren't completely thought-out designs. The quality from many of these manufactures is top notch, especially the aluminum anodizing and finishing, but there is always at least one huge problem. The Praetorian didn't cool well and collected a ton of dust due to many fans, and the Obsidian, especially the high end models like the 800D, just don't look professional enough to put under my desk at work.

    Silverstone (with the exception of the Raven series) look great at home or in the office with very neutral, unoffensive, yet non-traditional\unconventional designs.
  • der - Friday, June 5, 2015 - link

    Hmm....
    it's aite
  • wurizen - Friday, June 5, 2015 - link

    This is one of the greatest cases for under $180, in my opinion. I say that because of the construction and the quality. And sure it takes more time to assemble it than a huge case. But, with care and some thinking, which you guys apparently take the time nor care (just look at how you run the cables!)--this case can look very tidy. Even on a corsair AX760 which I use, the cables can be undone, even without removing the HDD case. And, if you wanna make it easire, remove the HDD case. So, your opinion on that is skewed or not correct. Again, there doesn't seem to be care, time and/or sound judgments on this review. Are you guys behind time? Swamped with so many products that your review and the way you assemble this case with a lack of care or tidiness is subpar?
  • wurizen - Friday, June 5, 2015 - link

    correction! I meant to say, "Which you guys apparently DON'T take the time nor care (just look at how you run the cables!)"

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now