System Benchmarks

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system at the wall. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor).

Idle Power Consumption

Load Power Consumption

Idle power consumption, compared to some of the other big systems, is actually rather good due to the 1300 W Platinum power supply. Load consumption for a 2P system was also lower than expected, giving 231W for both CPUs between load and idle power results.

Windows 7 POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows 7 starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.) 

POST (Power-On Self-Test) Time

As with most 2P systems, POST time is rather long. There is no management IC on this system, but DDR4 training for each socket easily accounts for 20-30 seconds of the POST time.

Rightmark Audio Analyzer 6.2.5

Rightmark:AA indicates how well the sound system is built and isolated from electrical interference (either internally or externally). For this test we connect the Line Out to the Line In using a short six inch 3.5mm to 3.5mm high-quality jack, turn the OS speaker volume to 100%, and run the Rightmark default test suite at 192 kHz, 24-bit. The OS is tuned to 192 kHz/24-bit input and output, and the Line-In volume is adjusted until we have the best RMAA value in the mini-pretest. We look specifically at the Dynamic Range of the audio codec used on board, as well as the Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise.

Rightmark: AA, Dynamic Range, 24-bit / 192 kHz

Rightmark: AA, THD+N, 24-bit / 192 kHz

The ALC662 is a laptop audio codec at best, and as a result the P900 joins the P300 down at the bottom of our charts. The THD+N result is actually not that bad in retrospect.

USB Backup

For this benchmark, we transfer a set size of files from the SSD to the USB drive using DiskBench, which monitors the time taken to transfer. The files transferred are a 1.52 GB set of 2867 files across 320 folders – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second HD videos. In an update to pre-Z87 testing, we also run MaxCPU to load up one of the threads during the test which improves general performance up to 15% by causing all the internal pathways to run at full speed.

USB 2.0 Copy Times

USB 3.0 Copy Times

USB 2.0 perfromance follows that of our other 9-series testing, while USB 3.0 perfomance for the P900 is similar to the P300.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

DPC Latency Maximum

Normally 2P systems have horrendous DPC Latency numbers, but the P900 does rather well and matches some of our Z87 counterparts. Normally we prefer under 100 microseconds, but ultimately under 200 is a good result also.

Office Performance Professional Performance: Windows
Comments Locked

61 Comments

View All Comments

  • extide - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    There are plenty of apps that benefit from 2P, are you just being ignorant?
  • Refuge - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Don't like the fan connectors, it is all too proprietary, this would be an I.T. Dept. worst nightmare in the long run, expensive to purchase, and short lived.

    Lenovo should know better...
  • GTVic - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    That is one connector of 3 and I'd assume the connector shown is an adapter and the fan has a regular connector that plugs into the grey adapter.
  • Ammaross - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Anyone else notice that the images on page 1 say "Embargoed until August 12th"?
  • Ammaross - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    2013 copyright. Nevermind. :P
  • DiHydro - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    311 watts at the wall with a 1.3 kW PSU? Good thing that PSU is 90% efficient at 20% load! The whole system only has a TDP of 470 Watts. While I understand they want more power available for HDDs and add in GPUs, the PSU seems over spec'd. How was this system loaded?
  • der - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    What a station this is! Haha!
  • ectoplasmosis - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    At the risk of sounding like a cliche, Apple did a better job of the whole baffled, segmented cooling, modular industrial engineering with the Power Mac G5 all of twelve years ago.

    Plus their casing still looks and feels sexy today, unlike this monstrosity full of ill-fitting moulded plastic...

    Even SGI boxes of 20 year vintage had more aesthetic mystique to them.
  • GTVic - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    It is designed to move the air, who cares what it looks like. This isn't a gaming machine with plexiglass panels and mood lighting.
  • Zak - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Can we please get better quality photos in these reviews? Please?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now