Crucial BX100 (120GB, 250GB, 500GB & 1TB) SSD Review
by Kristian Vättö on April 10, 2015 1:20 PM EST- Posted in
- Storage
- SSDs
- Crucial
- Micron
- Silicon Motion
- BX100
- SM2246EN
- Micron 16nm
AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy
While The Destroyer focuses on sustained and worst-case performance by hammering the drive with nearly 1TB worth of writes, the Heavy trace provides a more typical enthusiast and power user workload. By writing less to the drive, the Heavy trace doesn't drive the SSD into steady-state and thus the trace gives us a good idea of peak performance combined with some basic garbage collection routines. For full details of the test, please refer to the this article.
The BX100 continues to be a strong performer in our Heavy trace. It's not able to match the Samsung drives, but overall it provides very good performance for a value drive.
The number of high latency IOs isn't alarming either and the 120GB BX100 actually performs better than the 120GB 850 EVO, especially when the drive is full.
The power consumption is again excellent. While we have known that the SM2246EN is very power efficient, these tests further assure its efficiency and advantage over competing solutions.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
67 Comments
View All Comments
SeanJ76 - Monday, April 27, 2015 - link
-and Crucial has the worst reliability record when it comes to SSD's, right next to OCZ, two of the worst SSD makers today.........that's why their so dirt cheap!MarkHunt - Sunday, May 3, 2015 - link
BX100 250GB running excellent on an old SATA 2 motherboard based C2D Hackintosh, the boot speed is incredible and applications such as Logic open with little lag, which used to happen with previous HDD. TRIM is also simple to enable with Clover bootloader.rogerdpack - Thursday, May 14, 2015 - link
unfortunately it appears the 120GB version has dramatically worse write performance, just a heads up, than its counterparts: http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Crucial-BX100...kadajawi - Thursday, May 21, 2015 - link
Wait a minute. According to pretty much every other reviewer, news site etc. the power loss capacitors are missing from the BX100, yet Anandtech says they are there. What is it now? To me that's a pretty big deal, as I don't run my laptop with a battery and the power plug may occasionally slide out...LeonS - Monday, October 19, 2015 - link
Has anyone found a definitive answer for this yet? I have searched high and low, but cannot find an answer!sligett - Tuesday, June 16, 2015 - link
Are the idle power consumption labels switched for the BX100 250GB and 120GB?marvalsys - Monday, October 12, 2015 - link
Just spent way too much time trying to clone a 500GB WD hard disk with Windows 10 to a BX100 to use in a new Lenovo Flex 3 15". Clone went fine (booting from a True Image 2015 CD) but with cloned SSD installed laptop wouldn't boot / wouldn't even POST or allow booting from any other drive. Same exact clone to a Samsung 850 EVO worked flawlessly. Call to Crucial tech support resulted in rep saying that they have no current SSDs compatible with Flex 3 15 (even though their website lists 7, including the BX100). Seems to be some confusion - buyers beware!