Final Words

The XPS 13 is a bold move from Dell. High quality build materials, a good keyboard, a good trackpad, and the latest generation Intel Ultrabook processor all inside a chassis with a display that is two sizes too big stuffed into it. Combine that with a 1920x1080 IPS display on the base model, as well as solid state storage as the only option, and you would expect the starting price to be north of $1000. But it is not. The base price, with a Core i3, is just under $800.

The XPS 13 also carries with it amazing battery life, especially on the lower resolution base model. Broadwell-U is part of that, but the display is also a big part of that score, especially on the light battery life test, and Dell would have had to work on the entire package to achieve this kind of battery life result. Any one choice that was a power hog would have dragged the scores down.

Of course no device is perfect and the XPS 13 certainly has some niggling issues which will hopefully be resolved in revisions or updates. The auto-brightness issue is one that they will hopefully address soon. I have no issue with auto-brightness in most cases, but there needs to a way to disable it. Not only can it be frustrating at times when the display is constantly changing brightness, especially in a dim room, but it makes display calibration impossible. If the touch version also had the Yoga style display hinge, it would also increase the capabilities of this device, although that hinge style would be wasted on the non-touch model.

The display is really the one standout feature though. Finally, someone has reduced the bezel size on a laptop. If you are not a fan of smaller laptops, this may not be for you though, since really, it is closer to a typical 11.6 inch model than a 13.3 inch. It would be unbelievable if all laptops were to follow this design pattern, but for now we can hope that at least the premium devices will do so. Dell has opened the door and shown us what is possible, and it looks awesome. The one loser in this scenario is the webcam position, which at the lower left side of the screen is far from ideal. If you are a heavy user of the webcam, this could pose an issue.

Comparing the two models is difficult. On one hand, the FHD model starts at $800 and with the Core i5, bumps up to $900. That is a great starting price for a well-built device like this one, even though the base model has just 4GB of memory. Moving to 8GB means jumping up to $1000. However the move to the excellent high resolution display is yet another $300 on top of that, bringing the least expensive model with touch in at $1300. While I do love the display, and I prefer touch on notebooks, $1300 is getting pretty expensive compared to the original price, and you lose a lot of battery life as well.

Really, it is a great choice to have to make, because neither option is the wrong one. We often lament the lack of options on other laptops, but here Dell let's users decide what they value most: resolution and display quality, or battery life. The only real issue is that you can't get touch with FHD, and you can't get 512GB SSD with the FHD either.

The Dell XPS 13 ends up being responsive, small, light, and well built. Dell has crafted what I am sure most people were hoping for when the original Ultrabook specification was announced. On top of that, they have designed a laptop with class-leading battery life, and plenty of choice to let people buy as little or as much as they need. Considering the competition, this is clearly the Ultrabook of the Broadwell-U generation to beat, and from what we saw at CES it may very well go unchallenged for the remainder of the year.

Battery Life, Speakers, and Noise
Comments Locked

201 Comments

View All Comments

  • eanazag - Monday, February 23, 2015 - link

    A few take-aways from the article numbers -

    8 GB of RAM is necessary to boost the graphics numbers in most cases for the IGP. Sometimes the boost is very small, but it is there.

    Apple's display is looking pretty substandard compared to the numbers of the other devices.

    The battery life of the new Dell is remarkable; Apple needs to hit better numbers to be comparable as Windows is harder on battery life than OSX.

    I had a chance to look at this device in person about a week ago. It is a nice device, yet the build quality in hand feels better on the Razer Blade all around. Not Apples to Apples though because the price difference and components. At the end of the day I wanted the Blade more so.

    The Dell battery accessory is the best thing about this whole article because I deal with Dell at work. As someone who is caught in Dell's ecosystem that accessory is well thought out for versatility. I could use this for multiple devices that I carry and my users could too.
  • eanazag - Monday, February 23, 2015 - link

    Is the RAM and SSD upgradable by user (or power user)?
  • milkod2001 - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    RAM: no
    SSD: yes
  • sonicmerlin - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    Just wanted to point out the iPad Air 2 gets the same scores in GFXBench's Trex and Manhattan tests (offscreen). So Apple's tablet SoC has the same graphical power as Intel's ultra book chips, despite operating at a much lower TDP.
  • sonicmerlin - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    By scores I mean FPS.
  • candl - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    I couldn't find anywhere, but can the SSD drive be replaced? Or does it void warranty (or worse, it's actually soldered to the mainboard)?
  • candl - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    Ok, should have investigated further. The SSD is apparently replaceable. Sorry.
  • miahshodan - Tuesday, February 24, 2015 - link

    Am I the only one that does not want 16:9 especially in a screen that small. At least give me 16:10 so I can actually put something other than video on the screen without a scroll-fest. That is one thing that makes the surface 3 so appealing to me.
  • ilkhan - Wednesday, February 25, 2015 - link

    no internal pictures?

    Can you upgrade the SSD and/or memory?
  • Johnmcl7 - Sunday, March 1, 2015 - link

    No internal picture seems to be part of the reviews now which is disappointing particularly as these days the internal accessibility of parts can vary considerably.

    Thankfully Ifixit have posted a full teardown, the SSD is upgradeable and easy to access but the ram isn't as it's soldered on.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now