Final Words

The XPS 13 is a bold move from Dell. High quality build materials, a good keyboard, a good trackpad, and the latest generation Intel Ultrabook processor all inside a chassis with a display that is two sizes too big stuffed into it. Combine that with a 1920x1080 IPS display on the base model, as well as solid state storage as the only option, and you would expect the starting price to be north of $1000. But it is not. The base price, with a Core i3, is just under $800.

The XPS 13 also carries with it amazing battery life, especially on the lower resolution base model. Broadwell-U is part of that, but the display is also a big part of that score, especially on the light battery life test, and Dell would have had to work on the entire package to achieve this kind of battery life result. Any one choice that was a power hog would have dragged the scores down.

Of course no device is perfect and the XPS 13 certainly has some niggling issues which will hopefully be resolved in revisions or updates. The auto-brightness issue is one that they will hopefully address soon. I have no issue with auto-brightness in most cases, but there needs to a way to disable it. Not only can it be frustrating at times when the display is constantly changing brightness, especially in a dim room, but it makes display calibration impossible. If the touch version also had the Yoga style display hinge, it would also increase the capabilities of this device, although that hinge style would be wasted on the non-touch model.

The display is really the one standout feature though. Finally, someone has reduced the bezel size on a laptop. If you are not a fan of smaller laptops, this may not be for you though, since really, it is closer to a typical 11.6 inch model than a 13.3 inch. It would be unbelievable if all laptops were to follow this design pattern, but for now we can hope that at least the premium devices will do so. Dell has opened the door and shown us what is possible, and it looks awesome. The one loser in this scenario is the webcam position, which at the lower left side of the screen is far from ideal. If you are a heavy user of the webcam, this could pose an issue.

Comparing the two models is difficult. On one hand, the FHD model starts at $800 and with the Core i5, bumps up to $900. That is a great starting price for a well-built device like this one, even though the base model has just 4GB of memory. Moving to 8GB means jumping up to $1000. However the move to the excellent high resolution display is yet another $300 on top of that, bringing the least expensive model with touch in at $1300. While I do love the display, and I prefer touch on notebooks, $1300 is getting pretty expensive compared to the original price, and you lose a lot of battery life as well.

Really, it is a great choice to have to make, because neither option is the wrong one. We often lament the lack of options on other laptops, but here Dell let's users decide what they value most: resolution and display quality, or battery life. The only real issue is that you can't get touch with FHD, and you can't get 512GB SSD with the FHD either.

The Dell XPS 13 ends up being responsive, small, light, and well built. Dell has crafted what I am sure most people were hoping for when the original Ultrabook specification was announced. On top of that, they have designed a laptop with class-leading battery life, and plenty of choice to let people buy as little or as much as they need. Considering the competition, this is clearly the Ultrabook of the Broadwell-U generation to beat, and from what we saw at CES it may very well go unchallenged for the remainder of the year.

Battery Life, Speakers, and Noise
Comments Locked

201 Comments

View All Comments

  • rstuart - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    Finally laptop's are catching up to their tablet cousins in battery life and display. One feature the article doesn't mention but I really miss with laptops is Access Point mode for the wireless card. The Intel card in particular is poor - no AP mode, 1 radio so it can't do both 2.4 and 5 GHz at the same time, can't handle multiple SSID's. I would really like to see more detail on the WiFi components.
  • kevith - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    47 dB?! No thanks.
  • Dr_Orgo - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    My laptop (Gigabyte p34g) runs at 47-48 dB under full load as well. It's noticeably quite loud. I don't find it distracting while gaming as I'm engaged. It definitely wouldn't want to do video/photo editing with fans that loud though.
  • tipoo - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    " we have 24 execution units, compared to only 20 on Haswell-U."

    Isn't it 40 on the HD Graphics 5000, which is in Haswell-U? That's why I was confused about how a 24EU part at a lower boost clock does better than the old 40EU part at a higher boost, even with Broadwells new GPU features.
  • Brett Howse - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    This is not the Iris or HD 6000 version of Broadwell-U, so it compares to HD 4400/4600 more directly, which had 20 EUs. HD 6000 has 48 EUs, but I don't know a single laptop using it yet.
  • tipoo - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    Understandable, I'm curious what's making it perform better than the 40EU part though. I know a lot of that die space was used for running at a lower base clock to save power, but it had a higher turbo than the 5500 as well as near double the EUs, so the 5500 with less EUs and lower clocked performing better is what confused me.
  • lefty2 - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    This seems to be the first Broadwell-U review done by AnandTech. It's a pity you didn't compare performance with Kaveri laptops
  • Brett Howse - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    We have not had any Kaveri laptops in for review unfortunately. The only one in Bench is a prototype, so not all testing was done on it, but here's a comparison on what we have:
    http://anandtech.com/bench/product/1422?vs=1236
  • lefty2 - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    Thanks. At least that's something anyway ;)
  • Brett Howse - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    Don't forget though that's a 35w Kaveri vs 15w i5.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now