Final Words

The XPS 13 is a bold move from Dell. High quality build materials, a good keyboard, a good trackpad, and the latest generation Intel Ultrabook processor all inside a chassis with a display that is two sizes too big stuffed into it. Combine that with a 1920x1080 IPS display on the base model, as well as solid state storage as the only option, and you would expect the starting price to be north of $1000. But it is not. The base price, with a Core i3, is just under $800.

The XPS 13 also carries with it amazing battery life, especially on the lower resolution base model. Broadwell-U is part of that, but the display is also a big part of that score, especially on the light battery life test, and Dell would have had to work on the entire package to achieve this kind of battery life result. Any one choice that was a power hog would have dragged the scores down.

Of course no device is perfect and the XPS 13 certainly has some niggling issues which will hopefully be resolved in revisions or updates. The auto-brightness issue is one that they will hopefully address soon. I have no issue with auto-brightness in most cases, but there needs to a way to disable it. Not only can it be frustrating at times when the display is constantly changing brightness, especially in a dim room, but it makes display calibration impossible. If the touch version also had the Yoga style display hinge, it would also increase the capabilities of this device, although that hinge style would be wasted on the non-touch model.

The display is really the one standout feature though. Finally, someone has reduced the bezel size on a laptop. If you are not a fan of smaller laptops, this may not be for you though, since really, it is closer to a typical 11.6 inch model than a 13.3 inch. It would be unbelievable if all laptops were to follow this design pattern, but for now we can hope that at least the premium devices will do so. Dell has opened the door and shown us what is possible, and it looks awesome. The one loser in this scenario is the webcam position, which at the lower left side of the screen is far from ideal. If you are a heavy user of the webcam, this could pose an issue.

Comparing the two models is difficult. On one hand, the FHD model starts at $800 and with the Core i5, bumps up to $900. That is a great starting price for a well-built device like this one, even though the base model has just 4GB of memory. Moving to 8GB means jumping up to $1000. However the move to the excellent high resolution display is yet another $300 on top of that, bringing the least expensive model with touch in at $1300. While I do love the display, and I prefer touch on notebooks, $1300 is getting pretty expensive compared to the original price, and you lose a lot of battery life as well.

Really, it is a great choice to have to make, because neither option is the wrong one. We often lament the lack of options on other laptops, but here Dell let's users decide what they value most: resolution and display quality, or battery life. The only real issue is that you can't get touch with FHD, and you can't get 512GB SSD with the FHD either.

The Dell XPS 13 ends up being responsive, small, light, and well built. Dell has crafted what I am sure most people were hoping for when the original Ultrabook specification was announced. On top of that, they have designed a laptop with class-leading battery life, and plenty of choice to let people buy as little or as much as they need. Considering the competition, this is clearly the Ultrabook of the Broadwell-U generation to beat, and from what we saw at CES it may very well go unchallenged for the remainder of the year.

Battery Life, Speakers, and Noise
Comments Locked

201 Comments

View All Comments

  • Fedef - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    I mean, the different brightness level at witch you test the contrast can't be the cause of a contrast dropping from 1500 to 700, it is almost impossible.
    And even if that were the case you should take that as a reference because none uses their display at max bright unless outdoor in a sunny day.
  • Brett Howse - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    The meter we test the grayscale and color accuracy is not accurate at detecting blacks, so the contrast ratio will go down because of the noise in the sensor thinking that there is more light than there actually is, which is why we use a different meter to test contrast. So yes, just ignore that reading since it is incorrect.
  • Fedef - Friday, February 20, 2015 - link

    Thanks for clarifing that.
    Maybe you should just hide those result to avoid confusion.
  • srdm - Wednesday, April 22, 2015 - link

    This is probably a silly question, but I have been wondering if the very good black levels could to some part be due to the adaptive brightness "feature". Is it right that if you measure the black level on a black screen, then the adaptive brightness would lower the brightness and therefore you would see a better black level? Could that have been the case in your measurements?
  • althaz - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    This is a pretty awesome Ultrabook. I prefer the form factor of my Surface Pro, but if I were to begin typing on the go a lot more, this would be right at the top of my list I think. Looks even better than the MBA I offloaded!
  • MadMan007 - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    Looking at the model lineup...damn, they missed some pretty compelling options. Gimping the FHD screen in memory and SSD (and to a lesser extent CPU) is a damned shame. So what if the price would overlap with the bottom end of the QHD+ models, the battery life of the FHD screen model is insane; I would bet that one with an i5, 256GB or 512GB SSD, and 8GB of RAM would be extremely popular.
  • Nicky Drake - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    There is one: I have a Core i5 model with 8GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD. Availability of models varies a great deal between regions though. I'm in New Zealand. I'm loving the matte screen.
  • tipoo - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    So what's the secret to the HD Graphics 5500 doing better than the 5000? It's 24EUs @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz, vs 40EUs @ 200 - 1100 (Boost) MHz. These things stay at the boost clock while gaming most of the time, so the base freq difference isn't a huge factor. Near half the EUs, lower max clock, and better performance?
  • tipoo - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    I know of all the internal improvements to the Broadwell GPUs, but I thought we were expecting like 20% more squeezed out there, not being able to match a higher clocked 40EU part with a lower clocked 24EU part...

    I wonder what the 48 EU part with eDRAM will perform like then...
  • peterfares - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    Hurrah for RGB and not PenTile garbage!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now