Final Words

For 2015, we have a new Razer Blade, which on the outside is a dead ringer for last year’s model. We have the same design, the same keyboard, trackpad, strong aluminum body, and fantastic QHD+ display. All of those features were already excellent on the previous model, so Razer stayed conservative and kept all of it the same. Razer builds one of the best looking, most polished, and high quality gaming laptops on the market, so it makes sense not to rock the boat.

For 2015, what we have is more inside. You cannot see it from afar, but once you start using the new Blade, the new power becomes readily apparent. The GTX 970M is a perfect addition to this laptop, and we have seen sometimes up to 50% better performance than the 2014 model. The new card is much better at driving the 3200x1800 display, and with the new 1080p model sharing the same GPU, performance should be excellent.

The GTX 970M is somewhat of an obvious upgrade though. The 2014 model had the 870M, so it only makes sense that the new model would get the replacement for that card. What was a nice surprise for the 2015 model is both the new CPU, and the increased system memory. For the memory, the outgoing model’s 8 GB of RAM was a sore spot for me on a premium priced laptop. The move to 16 GB of DDR3L-1600 should satisfy most users’ needs for quite a while. It is extra important that Razer outfits the laptop with this because the RAM is soldered to the motherboard, so user upgrades are out of the question. And just to be clear, the review unit we received, and all of the 3200x1800 models will come with 16 GB of memory, but the 1080p model will be limited to 8 GB. The extra system RAM really opens the Razer Blade up to be more of a general purpose computer, with enough RAM for a couple of virtual machines to be running at any one time, or other memory intensive software.

The CPU is a very big boost as well, which could easily be overshadowed by the new graphics card. The move the 47 watt CPU gives a sharp boost in performance for all tasks, and the cooling system does not seem to be strained at all with the extra heat. With four cores at 2.6 GHz, hyperthreading, and boost clocks of 3.6 GHz, the CPU is quite a big upgrade. Once again, this opens the door to more non-gaming workloads for this device, which should increase its appeal.

Razer has added all of these internal upgrades, but one more thing that was not changed was the price. With a faster CPU, more RAM, and an upgraded GPU, the 2015 Razer Blade comes in at exactly the same price as last year’s model. Yes, they still offer the silly 128 GB SSD version, which you should really avoid if you are considering this device and are not comfortable replacing the SSD. Companies like to charge a lot for upgrades, and Razer is no exception, with the 256 GB model being $200 more than the 128 GB model. The 512 GB model is another $300 above that.

The base price of the 1080p model with a 256 GB SSD comes in at just under $2000, and the 1800p versions are priced at $2200 for 128 GB, $2400 for 256 GB, and $2700 for 512 GB. It is a lot of money for a 14” gaming laptop. Luckily the quality of the components really are top notch. For the money, you get a great display, good keyboard, excellent trackpad, and powerful internals wrapped in a thin machined aluminum body. It is a lot of money, but it is also a great experience.

Speakers and Software
Comments Locked

116 Comments

View All Comments

  • dovah-chan - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    I guess apple does it out of fear of receiving criticism for running hot or having a loud cooling system to tame the GPU? Maxwell doesn't run that hot so they should be able to keep it in check with at least a 965M but any higher would likely cause issues. They should at least include the option for a higher end mobile card.

    The school I'm at has 2011 iMacs with a 6570D and they tank so hard when using spaces and mission control. (not to mention the magic mouse is awful)
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - link

    given the 750m's TDP, nothing higher than the 850m would be feasible. the 965m draws way too much power for that machine to handle.
  • tipoo - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    Yep, I've been a lifelong PC guy, but I'm enjoying my 15" rMBP a lot. I just wish there was more GPU grunt for when I use Boot Camp for the occasional game.
  • fokka - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    one would think some kind of 960m should be in the cards, when the rmbp get upgraded and such a card is available from nvidia. that should be quite a bit faster than the current 750m, which is getting a bit old in the tooth, especially considering the machines price.
  • tipoo - Sunday, February 15, 2015 - link

    Brett? Anyone? Beuller?
  • eanazag - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    Is the SSD an mSATA or 2.5"?
  • eanazag - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    Nevermind, I reviewed the introduction over again.

    I have an aversion to LiteOn SSDs. I have no experience with that model, but I have with Dell OEM Lite-On drives as they struggle with garbage collection when Bitlocker is installed (Windows 7). For Windows 8 Bitlocker I recommend only encrypting used space option.
  • peterfares - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    Shame that it just has HDMI output. They should have put a DisplayPort (or two) outputs just like the MBP the body mimics. Can't even run an external WQHD screen, very lame.
  • BillyONeal - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    This is literally the only reason I have not bought one yet. :/
  • fokka - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    it has hdmi 1.4a, which should be good for 1600p/60p or 4k/30p according to wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#Version_compari...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now