Apple's Foray Into Payments

Apple has made two announcements this year that show an expansion into areas outside of the technology industry. The first was Apple Watch, which is most definitely a technology product but looks positioned against the current premium watch industry just as much as against current smartwatches on the market. The second was Apple's foray into the payment industry, Apple Pay. While Apple Watch won't be around until next year, Apple Pay is here right now with one caveat. Apple Pay currently only works in the United States, or more specifically, only with a credit card issued by a United States bank. However, the service will eventually be expanded to support cards issued by banks in other countries.

How Apple pay works is fairly straightforward, that's the entire point of it. If the region on your device is set to the United States, the passbook app will contain a card that allows you to add a credit or debit card. You can then either type your info in, or use your camera to get the information from the card. Once the card is verified by your bank, you will have a card that appears in passbook and you're ready to start using Apple Pay. From the user's perspective, Apple Pay is simple and easy to use. But what goes on behind the scenes to keep everything secure can be quite complicated.

Security

The first thing to know is that your credit card information is never stored on the phone. Upon adding a credit card, the information is encrypted and sent to the appropriate issuing bank which confirms that the card is valid. A token is then sent back to the iPhone and stored in the secure element, which is essentially just an internal smart card chip. This token, not your credit card number, is what is used during payments. Apple's marketing and technical material refers to it as a Device Account Number. The token itself resembles a credit card number, but the only similarity between it and your card is the 4 digits on the end. 

The use of tokens is where much of the security of Apple Pay comes from. By removing the actual credit card number from the equation, the merchant you're paying never gets to see your credit card number, security code, or your name. The token presumably is also only linked to the actual credit card via some database held by the bank, rather than some sort of equation that could be reverse engineered. This means that even in the event where a merchant is hacked and your token number shows up, it is entirely useless because it does not function as a credit card and is tied to the iPhone it was used on.

Beyond the overarching security, there's additional security at the time of payment. It begins with the use of Touch ID for authorizing payments. Although Touch ID launched with the iPhone 5s which does not have the necessary NFC hardware to use Apple Pay, I believe that this sort of service was the original goal when Touch ID was first being created. Paying with Apple Pay requires using Touch ID to verify your fingerprint. This prevents anyone from making purchases using your iPhone if it is lost or stolen.

One thing to note is that Apple Pay is not just a service for making purchases in stores. It also works for making purchases at online retailers than integrate it into their applications. All the security features that I've described apply to both in-store and online purchases, so there's no compromises on either side.

Going Forward

Making Apple Pay successful is going to take a lot of work on both Apple's part and on the part of retailers. Currently the service only works with cards from US banks, leaving out the rest of the world. Apple needs to expand the service much quicker than competitors have done so with theirs. For example, Google Wallet remains a US only service over 3 years after its initial launch. Apple Pay is not going to achieve success if it ends up in the same situation. Apple has given no timeframe for expansion to other countries, but if the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus get replaced by newer models before Apple Pay expands outside the US it will be a worrisome situation.

Apple also needs to convince retailers to support the service. The list of supported merchants on the Apple Pay section of their website has grown since its initial launch, and if Apple Pay is ever going to be a viable way to make everyday purchases that list needs to continue to grow. Work by banks to increase adoption of NFC capable terminals will also speed up this process, as Apple Pay works with existing NFC enabled checkouts. Apple also faces resistance from retailers that are partnered with other payment systems. Recently there have been reports that merchants who support the CurrentC mobile payment standard are disabling NFC on the payment terminals in their stores to block Apple Pay. I don't believe this will be an issue in the long term because consumers will realize when companies are prioritizing their own agenda over the customer's experience and they'll go to other retailers. If Walmart won't support Apple Pay and a customer wants to use it, they'll just go to Target instead.

As someone who doesn't live in the United States, I'm hopeful that the service will expand to Canada before this iPhone becomes obsolete. There are many obstacles in the way, but Apple appears to have put more effort into working with banks and merchants to get the service off the ground than any of the other mobile payment services we have today. How things play out will only be revealed with time.

Continuity Conclusion
Comments Locked

173 Comments

View All Comments

  • piroroadkill - Monday, October 27, 2014 - link

    Call and SMS handoff to other devices! Woah, we're going back in time to Palm Pre. Still a pretty solid set of ideas around that device...
  • ppi - Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - link

    I have SMS synced with my Outlook for a year already (and nobody knows how long our IT witheld that one)
    Call handoff ... I am not sure I would want it, but as optional feature, why not.
  • CharonPDX - Monday, October 27, 2014 - link

    Continuity looks great!

    Too bad everyone in my house has one side of the equation too old.
    I have an iPhone 5C (good!) with an old 2008 iMac (nope.)
    My daughter has an iPad Air (good!) and an iPhone 4 (nope, not even iOS 8,) with a 2008 MacBook Pro (nope.)
    My wife has an iPhone 4S (nope - just "call on your Mac",) and a brand new MacBook Air (good!)

    So the only person in my family that can make *ANY* use of Continuity/Handoff is my wife, and then only for "call on your Mac" - AKA " Use your Mac as a bluetooth Speakerphone.)
  • Highhbrid - Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - link

    There seems to be a lot of talk about soldered RAM in Mac products. The main reason why you can't upgrade RAM in phones is because the form factor would not be nearly as thin and it wouldn't exactly be an SoC anymore.. form factor is crucial to a handheld device. You have to consider things holistically if you're going to try and compare different fruit here. Very seldom do I observe this amongst convo.

    I think that with a Macbook Air there is legitimate reasoning for soldering the RAM in place. You and Apple want that device as thin as possible. The thinner you can get it, the lighter too.

    With Macbook Pros the argument is a lot weaker. Until those bitches get razer thin (which we're an iteration or two from) removable RAM is easy to pull off. Under a generous, PRIVATE Apple, I believe that they would throw that in.

    However when you consider the demographic of Macbook Pro purchasers, it's quite an easy money grab for Apple.

    "Higher reliability, better performance, and a more compact design" some will say.

    Reliable is in, I put the RAM in wrong? Very rarely do I reset someone's RAM to fix there problem.
    Performance: I've seen how fast 16GB @ 2133 MHz goes. I'm not buying it.
    Compactness? Refer to the above.

    Soldered RAM in a Mac Mini? lol Apple
  • solipsism - Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - link

    You didn't make a valid argument to support your comments that the MBP isn't think enough at this point, you just said it would have to be "razor thin" and eluded to the MBA being thinner.

    How much space is available right now for removable RAM when you consider the size of the sticks, the channel they sit it, how much much further it will sit below the main board, will that interfere with the bottom casing if it's pressed upon in that area, and will there be enough room for thermals.

    I suppose it's possible they could have, but it does come with a cost, which you didn't address at all except to say there is zero benefit.
  • Highhbrid - Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - link

    It's inevitable that they will get thinner. How thin? Who knows. But apparently thin is a big deal to Apple, that was their opening feature to the Air 2 announcement. We will see.

    I think that the first MBPr could have physically included removable RAM, even if it has to be 1mm thicker. Ultimately, that's Apple decision and they could have included it, I feel.

    I didn't say anything about the MBA except that there is a valid reason for soldering the memory into place. The MBP are thin enough IMO
  • blackcrayon - Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - link

    Soldered RAM alone doesn't mean anything. The real issue is that the device will cost more up front. If you won't/can't pay more just buy something else.
  • KoolAidMan1 - Wednesday, October 29, 2014 - link

    Soldered RAM on the Mac Mini is terrible. It makes sense if they made it REALLY small like an AppleTV but its the same chassis as before.

    There's an excuse with the MBA and MBP. This is just stupid.
  • jaymond - Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - link

    When will One Drive or Google Drive copycat the photo features of iCloud Drive? I'm a One Drive user and would love this feature. I'm not willing to pay Apple's prices for cloud storage when I have 1TB free with One Drive with Office 360, but I would like to get my photos off my HDD on my Macbook Air.
  • RichieTech - Wednesday, October 29, 2014 - link

    The iMac starts at $2500..... starts! And yet no touchscreen! That's the most asinine thing I've ever heard. I'm sure it looks gorgeous but for that price it should do more and so should the previous models for that matter.

    The iPad can't form its own network, cant have multiple user accounts and doesn't have its own file structure and cost between $500 to $800.... pffffttt !!! I just spit my beer all over my desk :/

    I don't see anything different about OS X(

    Thanks iCloud for pics of Scarlett Joe... I'm sure you'll keep my credit card safe with Apple Pay?!

    You fear after 13 years, you should be glad after 13 years your moving on!

    Nope

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now