iCloud Drive and Photo Library

At WWDC 2014 Apple introduced a number of significant additions and improvements to their iCloud service for developers and consumers. On the user side we got iCloud Drive and iCloud Photos. Both of these features position themselves against the offerings from other companies in the increasingly competitive cloud storage space. Apple's advantage within their own ecosystem is how iCloud integrates with their own systems better than Dropbox, OneDrive, or Google Drive ever can. Integration cannot keep a service alive if it becomes stagnant though, and these two features are very necessary additions.

iCloud Drive

iCloud Drive is arguably the more important and interesting of the two features. In the past, iCloud has been something like a magic black box that users can never access or even look into. Files would be created in an application, sent to iCloud, and hopefully they would show up on your other devices. This type of model makes for a great document synchronizing solution, but it's not very good at some of the other things people have grown to expect from a cloud storage service. Apple had to build something that allowed users to manage their documents stored in iCloud, including the ability to add or remove files as needed without having to go into each individual iCloud enabled application.

As a file storage service, iCloud Drive functions exactly how you would expect. You can make folders, and upload files to those folders which can be accessed on any other device with access to iCloud drive. In addition to those files, iCloud Drive also houses the files for any iCloud enabled application. As you can see above, each iWork and iLife application also has its files accessible in iCloud Drive, along with third party iCloud enabled apps like Scanner by Readdle. 

Your drive can be accessed in a few different ways. In OS X it's integrated right into Finder and is listed in Favorites by default. Windows users can download Apple's iCloud Control Panel to have it accessible via Windows Explorer. I've avoided the Windows solution because my past experience is that having iCloud Control Panel do anything with to Windows Explorer will make it crash Windows Explorer. While I haven't experienced that while using the new Control Panel 4.0 for the purposes of this review, I still don't trust it.

The third method is to access it from iCloud.com. You would think that with these 3 options, including a web based option, Apple would have every platform covered. Unfortunately they don't. There is no way to directly manage iCloud Drive from an iOS device because iCloud.com displays a special page with links to get information on setting up iCloud and installing Find my iPhone. Applications that integrate with iCloud have the ability to open documents stored in iCloud Drive using the document picker, but there's no way to move or delete other files. I don't know if this is just an oversight or if Apple doesn't want it accessible via mobile but it is honestly a necessary feature and I hope to see it added soon either through an app or through iCloud.com on iOS.

iCloud Photos

iCloud Photo Library was released with iOS 8.1 in the form of a public beta. I actually wrote about it in my initial iOS 8 review due to confusion regarding its availability. It was only near the end of Apple's beta cycle that they revealed SMS Forwarding and iCloud Photo Library would be arriving with a later release. On top of that, using the OS X Yosemite preview would cause the option to reveal itself on your iOS devices. As a result, my devices running the gold master build still had the feature and I was unaware that for most users it would not be accessible until October. But now October has come and we can take a closer look at iCloud Photo Library in its beta form. Users who want to try it out just need to opt into the beta in the Photos & Camera section of the Settings application. Doing so will change the name of Camera Roll to All Photos in the Photos app.

As I've stated before, iCloud Photo Library is not the same as Photo Stream. Photo Stream is really just a method of pushing your photos between all your devices. It relies entirely on local storage and the photos are removed from iCloud after 30 days. iCloud Photo Library keeps all of your pictures in the cloud, and keeps the most recent and frequently accessed ones locally on your device. This is often referred to as nearline storage. Users can also specify to download copies that are optimized for their display resolution which will save space compared to storing full resolution copies on local storage. 

iCloud Photo Library is definitely a great feature, but right now the experience is missing a few key things. On iOS it works very well due to how the entire photo experience is within the Photos application. On OS X it's still lacking. Some people may feel it's unfair to criticize certain aspects due to the fact that the feature is technically a beta, but oversights need to be addressed for them to be fixed. 

The biggest issue for me is that Apple's Photos application for OS X won't be shipping until early 2015. That's quite a long time after the initial release of Yosemite, and an even longer time after iOS 8 was released. This means that there is currently no way to access photos stored in iCloud on a Mac unless it is done through the web interface. It's an okay solution for now, but the web interface is nothing spectacular. It's essentially the iPad Photos app interface but in a web browser. My biggest issue with it is that it doesn't actually scale. The Safari window with iCloud Photos above is as small as you can make the window without introducing horizontal scrolling. Making the window larger doesn't show more photos on the screen, it just makes the thumbnails bigger. This contrasts with iCloud Drive's web interface which does scale the arrangement of folders based on the size and shape of the window.

There is definitely a lot of pressure involved in trying to ship two major operating system updates around the same time every year, and to pack in new features that work across both of them. Apple made it clear at WWDC 2014 that Photos on OS X wasn't going to be ready until 2015, but I think the issue created by that could have been addressed much better by updating iPhoto to support iCloud Photo Library rather than relying on the web interface.

Notification Center and Spotlight Search on OS X Continuity
Comments Locked

173 Comments

View All Comments

  • blackcrayon - Monday, October 27, 2014 - link

    That's notification center, it was already in Mavericks. And iOS for that matter. It's not exactly like the gadget sidebar but there is some overlap now that you can put custom widgets there.
  • Colin1497 - Monday, October 27, 2014 - link

    Suggestion for 8.1.1: Recalibrate "Motion Calibration" so that it isn't constantly running location services and destroying my battery life, forcing me to simply turn off the functionality. There's no way that it's working as intended when it basically runs location services all the time to the extent that my phone is always warm and my battery only lasts half a day. Obviously everyone isn't having this problem, only people who have apps that tie into "Motion Activity," but it's a legit problem with plenty of discussion on the support forums.
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, October 27, 2014 - link

    Yeah seriously, I turned it off because it runs almost constantly. I don't even know what it's doing but it hasn't impacted my device by not having it.
  • tipoo - Monday, October 27, 2014 - link

    You know what I'd love is some performance tests with it, especially on older hardware, like Core 2 Duo/320M era, and on spinny hard drives. I've held back on upgrading the macbook in the family due to some mixed messages about it, some say it's the same as Mavericks (which I find a dog, tbh, Windows 7 is so much faster on the same system), some say it's a bit slicker in some areas, while others say it tanked performance.

    I've gotten the feeling that OSX has become less optimized for HDDs as they optimized more for SSDs. I wonder if it still even does things like hot file clustering?
  • xrror - Monday, October 27, 2014 - link

    This will sound like a cop out, but I can't recommend strongly enough just getting a cheap SSD for the older core2 iMacs and macbooks. Even without a ram upgrade (stock 2GB), the difference is astounding.
  • tipoo - Monday, October 27, 2014 - link

    I would agree with that, though it's not my own system so explaining and getting someone else to invest in a SSD is a bit of an uphill battle, and besides that I think they'd rather be putting that towards saving for a new system eventually too.

    Maybe I'll give them the Momentus XT hybrid from my dying Dell Studio 1555, that adds a bit of peppiness.
  • DPUser - Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - link

    Only problem is Apple has really put the screws to enabling Trim for third party SSDs in Yosemite.

    http://www.cindori.org/trim-enabler-and-yosemite
  • tipoo - Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - link

    That sucks, but wasn't TRIM killing SSDs in OSX for some reason? It only worked well on Apple certified SSDs.
  • DPUser - Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - link

    Trim works perfectly in OSX with SSDs that support it (meaning all current SSDs). I encourage anyone who cares to lobby Apple to change its policy in this regard: stop locking out Trim for third party SSDs.
  • Penti - Monday, October 27, 2014 - link

    Regarding design, I don't think old users will be shocked. The dock looks essentially the same as in OS X Tiger (10.4 or reminiscence of Ceetah – Tiger 10.0 - 10.4).

    Translucency or semi-transparency has been done for so many years in different Window Managers and shells for *NIX system or Windows Vista–7. While they drop some skeuomorphism they at the same time introduce transparency, new animations and other stuff that Microsoft sacrificed in order to run on low-end devices. They even keep rounded of corners. Though I don't think it's much of a shift, it's more back to the roots of earlier OS X releases and still builds on NeXTSTEP looks in some ways. A simpler cleaner look doesn't go against that. Of course technology and hardware makes some things more natural today than 15 years ago. The roots isn't really on machines capable of translucency or of 16.7+ million colors, or accelerated animations.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now