Battery Life

One of the big draws of the larger form factor is battery life. Due to fundamental scaling issues, a bigger phone should be able to achieve greater battery life than a small one. This is because a smartphone's PCB generally remains constant in size, so it becomes an increasingly smaller proportion of the overall device size. This leaves increasingly large areas where batteries fill in the gap. In order to quantify just how big of a difference this makes when going from 4.7" to 5.5", we turn to our standardized battery life test suite. For those unfamiliar with our testing, the display is calibrated to 200 nits and all background tasks are disabled in order to ensure that only the foreground task is active in our tests.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

As we previously discussed, the iPhone 6 Plus performs quite admirably in the WiFi web browsing test. As expected, there's a healthy bump over the iPhone 6, but it's not quite a massive leap as a larger battery size might suggest.

Web Browsing Battery Life (4G LTE)

Once again, we see a similar pattern with the LTE web browsing test. Since both phones are based on the same platform, it makes sense that their results track quite closely together as we're only scaling display and battery size within the context of these tests.

However, the web browsing test is a mostly display-bound test, even if there is an SoC efficiency aspect that can make a significant difference. In order to better test SoC efficiency and get an idea of the dynamic range that a phone has in battery life, we turn to our compute-bound tests. Unfortunately, Basemark OS II stops the test too early due to low battery notifications in iOS, so we cannot use that test for a proper comparison to other phones.

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

As shown in these charts, the iPhone 6 Plus manages to sustain a significant boost in battery life when compared to the iPhone 6, and performance is almost identical as well. It seems that the iPhone 6 Plus begins to throttle towards the end of the test simply because it has more time to generate heat rather than any real difference in cooling, as skin temperatures were also around 43C on the iPhone 6 Plus in this test. It's also important to note that the iPhone 6 Plus is rendering at 2208x1242 internally in order to keep proper scaling with the 163 points per inch system that iOS has, which accounts for part of the performance delta.

Overall, battery life on the iPhone 6 Plus ranges between about 20% higher to 40% higher depending on the balance of display power and SoC/baseband power in any given situation. Heavily display-bound situations will be closer to the 20% higher figure while more SoC-bound tasks will tend toward 40% or even higher. Purely idle situations should see even greater improvements as any situation where the display is off will see linear scaling with battery size.

Charge Time

Charge time is one of the key metrics for getting a holistic picture of battery life, as it's impossible to really understand whether a phone will be able to stay mobile as needed without considering recharging. In some cases such as a trade show or travel, it doesn't matter if a phone lasts 20% longer than the competition if it loses all the time gained in time spent on a charger. In order to test this, power is tracked from when the phone is connected to the charger to when it reaches the lowest power draw state on the AC adapter.

Charge Time

Unfortunately, the included charger is the same 5W charger that we've seen for years now. As a result, the iPhone 6 Plus is constrained by the relatively low maximum power that it can put out. Those that wish for faster charging should look into getting an iPad A/C adapter as the iPhone 6 Plus will charge faster when connected to it.

Introduction and "Bendgate" Display and Camera
Comments Locked

191 Comments

View All Comments

  • GigaMonster - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    iOS has built in support for a stylus.
  • GigaMonster - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    iOS has built-in support for numerous stylus. Feel free to pick one up if you feel the need. WACOM provides a very nice 2048 one and there are plenty of apps available that make use of the multiple levels of sensitivity.
  • Narg - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    I would liked to have seen photo comparisons with Nokia's phones in this....
  • nerd1 - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    WHY, WHY anandtech keeps using chrome browser for any browser based benchmark, and using safari browser for apple device? It's just not fair. Sammy's browser has almost TWICE better sunspider score compared to chrome, almost the same as Safari!
  • Parhel - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Not true at all. Not even close to true. Not even a little tiny bit.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Check other reviews who tested both browsers. Stock browser get ~400ms for sunspider test, which is almost 2X better results than chrome.
  • port1974 - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    LOL...get a clue!

    When Ford builds a V8 engine do you really think it holds up to ones built by the likes of Porche or Ferrari??? Do you think your 40,000 car can compete with one that costs 400,000.

    Like so many others, your are obviously upset at the fact that you can't afford, or refuse to pay more for these handsets. You are also swayed by raw numbers as opposed to real life performance.

    Apple doesn't need a low end 13 megapixel camera to take great shots when it can accomplish the same result with a properly built 8 Megapixel sensor, that's been optimized fully.

    The operating system is so tightly programmed that it doesn't require 4 cores and 3 GB of ram to outperform the competition.

    Android is a Mal & Spyware riden operating system with over 1 million corrupt apps and counting. It's the Windows of mobile computing. Sloppily written and full of security compromises.

    When Apple updates its software everyone who owns any previous models is immediately included, unlike Android users that have to wait years, if they get them at all. Let me guess...you're still on Jellybean "1 point who cares" !

    Comparing a quality built product to one built out of mediocre scraps is beyond ridiculous and only goes to prove you refuse to grasp reality.

    Let's not even get started on the smartwatch debate...that's a definite dead end for you, given the crap other companies have put forth so far.

    I'm not trying to put you down, as you appear to be trying to do to others, with your less than well thought out rant...just hoping at some point you get the chance to remove the blinders.

    Best of luck with that!
  • nerd1 - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    Hyundai genesis v8 is actually faster than Porsche panamera baseline model.
  • GigaMonster - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Maybe 0-60, but that's just spec wars. That Gv8 will never keep up with the Panamera around a course or through some mountain roads.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Based on Nürburgring lap time results, Gv6 is ~10 sec slower than low-end porsches (8:30 vs 8:40), so I bet the v8 version can easily keep up with 310HP baseline panamera at tracks. Maybe I am wrong.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now