While we’re still working on the full review, I want to get out some preliminary results for the iPhone 6. For now, this means some basic performance data and battery life, which include browser benchmarks, game-type benchmarks, and our standard web browsing battery life test. There’s definitely a lot more to talk about for this phone, but this should give an idea of what to expect in the full review. To start, we'll look at the browser benchmarks, which can serve as a relatively useful proxy for CPU performance.

SunSpider 1.0.2 Benchmark  (Chrome/Safari/IE)

Kraken 1.1 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

Google Octane v2  (Chrome/Safari/IE)

WebXPRT (Chrome/Safari/IE)

There are a few interesting observations here, as a great deal of the scaling is above what one would expect from the minor frequency bump when comparing A7 and A8. In SunSpider, we see about a 13% increase in performance that can't be explained by frequency increases alone. For Kraken, this change is around 7.5%, and we see a similar trend across the board for the rest of these tests. This points towards a relatively similar underlying architecture, although it's still too early to tell how much changes between the A7 and A8 CPU architectures. Next, we'll look at GPU performance in 3DMark and GFXBench, although we're still working on figuring out the exact GPU in A8.

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Overall

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Physics

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

In in GPU benchmarks, we generally see a pretty solid lead over the competition for the iPhone 6/A8. It's seems quite clear that there is a significant impact to GPU performance in the iPhone 6 Plus due to the 2208x1242 resolution that all content is rendered at. It seems that this is necessary though, as the rendering system for iOS cannot easily adapt to arbitrary resolutions and display sizes. Before we wrap up this article though, I definitely need to address battery life. As with all of our battery life tests, we standardize on 200 nits and ensure that our workload in the web browsing test has a reasonable amount of time in all power states of an SoC.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

As one can see, it seems that Apple has managed to do something quite incredible with battery life. Normally an 1810 mAh battery with 3.82V nominal voltage would be quite a poor performer, but the iPhone 6 is a step above just about every other Android smartphone on the market. The iPhone 6 Plus also has a strong showing, although not quite delivering outrageous levels of battery life the way the Ascend Mate 2 does. That's it for now, but the full review should be coming in the near future.

Comments Locked

316 Comments

View All Comments

  • tuxRoller - Tuesday, September 23, 2014 - link

    I have, that's why I said "my experience". It's entirely possible all the win8 devices i tried were crap, so I asked if you have something I can refer to verify your claim
  • iLovefloss - Monday, September 22, 2014 - link

    This is just the preliminary results. Once the full review come in, then we can judge. This preview doesn't even have the Note 3 in all the tests.
  • kirito - Monday, September 22, 2014 - link

    Motorola or LG should ask Nvidia for assistance. Nvidia is becoming a soc powerhouse in these tests.
  • varinsgolf - Monday, September 22, 2014 - link

    How come there's no comparison to Samsung's Note 3? If the iphone6 plus is being reviewed, it should compare with other phablets as well.
  • tekeffect - Monday, September 22, 2014 - link

    I got the 6. I had a palm pre and then all the htc evos and ones. I've never liked Apple much but liked apple care. When the screen got big I decided a year of Apple was worth a shot. This phone is great. They probably should have made it slightly thicker and put in a massive battery. But it's a great phone. Apple haters should give it a shot.
  • lilo777 - Monday, September 22, 2014 - link

    Note 4 is expected to be a great phone too (slightly thicker with bigger battery and a lot more goodies). So why bother with iPhone?
  • PeteH - Monday, September 22, 2014 - link

    Why not try both and pick the one you like?
  • blackcrayon - Tuesday, September 23, 2014 - link

    Sounds like you just said they were both great phones...
  • bignbullish - Monday, September 22, 2014 - link

    Why doesn't any of the NOKIA LUMIAs figure in your comparisons?
  • Sushisamurai - Monday, September 22, 2014 - link

    guys... seriously, just check the Bench part of this website, your Nokia Lumnia's are in there even if no full review of them has been done. Seriously, just check the bench site - it's all there.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now