ASRock X99 WS Conclusion

If we were to assign characteristics to a company based on previous launches, ASRock tends to be the one that has a mountain of small new ideas. Some of these ideas work really well and become essential parts of the package, while others initially sound confusing and drop off the radar. While the workstation route is somewhat new to ASRock’s consumer motherboard design team, it seems that the historic characteristics of ASRock are not here in the X99 WS – there is very little that seems ‘new’ compared to everyone else. If we look at other motherboards in this review, we have features such as the OC Socket, the UV light-up rear-panel or interesting PCIe/storage arrangements, but it would seem that ASRock’s effort in the X99 WS is more on the components than the functionality.

The big thing ASRock is promoting with the X99 WS is full Xeon E5 v3 support with ECC and RDIMM verification up to 128GB of memory. The WS is not the only motherboard in the X99 consumer stack to accept Xeons (in fact, most of them will), although few openly announce ECC/RDIMM support. The main lynchpin with ASUS WS motherboards, for example, is QVL support for a large range of additional PCIe devices that regular users do not use (Xeon Phi, RAID cards, FPGA). Unfortunately ASRock has made no effort to communicate that support in their press or online materials, suggesting that the only move towards ‘WS’ naming is the dual Intel NIC design with vPro support (for Windows Server applications) and some higher end components for 12-phase power delivery.

With all this being said, the X99 WS is a more than capable board for a build. It gives a set of six full-length PCIe slots for additional cards, M.2 support up to 110mm and for WS users and a pair of COM headers teamed with a TPM header. We get the enhanced audio with Purity Sound 2 hiding a Realtek ALC1150 codec under an EMI shield, and the extra-large heatsinks should help with heat dissipation. One additional benefit with the WS is that the z-height is sufficient to use this motherboard in a 1U server, allowing for high-density setups. If a user is building a heavy compute platform, there are two additional power connections for PCIe cards, although the 4-pin molex connector in the middle of the board is somewhat unwieldy from a cable management perspective.

From a BIOS and software perspective, the BIOS has been rearranged slightly for manual overclocking which makes it easy to understand where everything is, although there is room for some small adjustment. The aesthetic of the BIOS is very easy to read, which is a bonus, although there is no 'simple mode' similar to the other manufacturers. The software uses the standard A-Tuning interface, and while it offers a good number of options, it does get marked down in a couple of areas where the interface could be improved for a better user experience.

The motherboard offers a number of very positive points in terms of stock performance – the MultiCore Turbo rules giving it a push ahead of the ASUS/GIGABYTE results while having the lowest idle power consumption. The audio is in the middle of the back, while the DPC and POST times are a little behind the best X99 tested in this review. Automatic overclocking offers a good number of options from 4.0 GHz to 4.5 GHz, and manual overclocking reached 4.5 GHz before peak temperatures became too high.

Overall, the ASRock X99 WS performs well out of the box and enforces the support for Xeons + ECC/RDIMMs should a user need it. However, it marks a departure from previous ASRock releases by not adding much ‘extra’ to the overall experience in terms of direct functionality.

GIGABYTE X99-UD7 WiFi Conclusion MSI X99S SLI Plus Conclusion
Comments Locked

62 Comments

View All Comments

  • The Von Matrices - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Ian never said the MSI board wouldn't overclock, just that an unidentified bug causes its overclocked performance to be significantly lower than the other boards. based upon the results, putting your same CPU in the other boards would make it perform CPU 4.5% faster; alternatively, you would have to clock your CPU to 4.8GHz in the MSI board to match the 4.6GHz overclocks in the other boards.
  • woj666 - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    This review had the opposite result. The MSI board was able to perform even better than the others overclocked. It's disappointing but sometimes we just get bad boards.

    http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2014/09/09/x99-mo...
  • The Von Matrices - Saturday, September 27, 2014 - link

    The bit-tech review has the CPU in the MSI board overclocked higher than the other boards, which would reasonably would make it perform better. The problem that Ian experienced is not that the board couldn't overclock the CPU; it's that at the same clock speed, the MSI board is significantly slower than its competitors, and the bit-tech results do not replicate Ian's circumstances since they have different overclocks on each CPU on each board.
  • just4U - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    From the article "I have had failures in the past (Bluetooth adaptor shorting out, DRAM or PCIe slots not working, PSU going BANG… twice) "

    ----

    I was half-cut trying to install ram at 4am.. in near darkness, the combination turned into a epic fail..
  • owcraftsman - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    Very unfair to MSI to select top of the line boards for the other manufacturers and a bottom of the stack from MSI. The SLI Plus is a value edition at best so spare me an explanation.
  • bigboxes - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    "Due to the way the motherboard manufacturers were sampling for X99, we were unable to align several motherboards of a similar price." If you had actually read the article you may have not come across as a love struck fanboy.
  • The_Assimilator - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Apparently you failed to notice (no doubt because you didn't read the article) that the MSI was gicven a "Recommended" award. Explanation: you are a tool.
  • Laststop311 - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Once again Asus is on top. Their bios is the best designed with the best features. It's why my x58 board is an asus rampage formula. I'm gonna stay with x58 tho rather get a 55" LG oled TV
  • The Von Matrices - Saturday, September 27, 2014 - link

    For the price of the ASUS board plus a 5820K CPU you could have any of the other boards plus a 5930K CPU, which would negate any performance advantage of the ASUS board. The ASUS board is only worth considering if price is no object, which from my experience seems to describe most LGA2011 buyers.
  • Dadunn1700 - Tuesday, August 25, 2015 - link

    Or u can save up for alittle while longer and get the Asus board AND the 5930k AND be faster yet again. Round and round we go. Although it's much easier to chg a CPU rather than a whole motherboard.

    Point is No matter what better is better....but not necessarily at the same price point. Tho I don't think $500 is a lot of money for enthusiasts to spend on PC parts. Especially essential ones. Being a flagship motherboard it's not exactly geared toward budget builders anyway....ie ppl concerned with performance per dollar. They want the best....period.

    Personally I don't think $500 is a lot of money myself for a part i probably won't be replacing anytime soon.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now