Nokia Lumia 930 Review
by Brett Howse on September 8, 2014 3:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Smartphones
- Microsoft
- Nokia
- Mobile
- windows phone
- Lumia
Wi-Fi
The Snapdragon 800 SoC supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac wireless, and the Lumia 930 implements all of them, which means it supports 5 GHz as well as 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi. There is only single band Wi-Fi though, so on the typical N network you would be limited to a maximum connection speed of 150 Mbps. If you own an 802.11ac router, connection speeds will get bumped to the maximum of 433 Mbps.
I was able to achieve peak transfer rates of around 55 Mpbs with the Lumia 930 on a Wireless N router with just the 930 attached. Due to only having 802.11n available, the maximum transfer speed is going to be reduced compared to 802.11ac.
Cellular
Cellular connectivity on the Lumia 930 supports category 4 LTE for maximum download speeds of 150 Mbps, with 50 Mbps upload. LTE bands on the 930 that I was sampled were 1, 3, 7, 8, and 20, which prevented me from testing LTE at my location. DC-HSPA is also supported for up to 42.2 Mpbs downloads if available in your area.
Speedtest.net did not give me great numbers on the days I tested it, but that can be typical of HSPA depending on cell tower usage.
GNSS
Again, with the Qualcomm silicon at the heart of this device, we’re working with well known, and well tested parts such as the GNSS. The Lumia 930 supports Cellular and Wi-Fi assist and supports GPS, GLONASS, and BeiDou for location, and it locks quickly. Hopefully the days of poor location tracking are over.
Speaker
The 930 has just a single rear-facing speaker. Both volume and sound quality are surprisingly good with this speaker, but there is certainly no sense of stereo sound. For notifications, this speaker is adequate for the task but if you are going to watch a movie, you would be happier with a set of headphones.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
115 Comments
View All Comments
Gunbuster - Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - link
Good to finally have a review, even if it's conveniently just in time to be buried by apple articles.Brett Howse - Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - link
That's my bad I received the phone at the start of August but was unable to review it for a while due to personal matters.jimbo2779 - Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - link
Lol I gotta say I did think this myself but am sure it is just unlucky timing.I am very glad that WP is starting to get some virtual column inches around here, there really isn't a best place to read reviews about phones or anything else tech related really.
maximumGPU - Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - link
Yes thanks Brett for finally reviewing a windows phone. Hope they get more coverage.halcyon - Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - link
Shortest real-world battery life.Longest battery recharge times.
Non-removable battery.
Slowest / Stupidest web-browser for visiting web-pages and no real alternative on the whole platform (all are IE skins basically).
And very little WP apps to combat the sucky browsing experience.
Now, remind me again, why would I buy this as a smartphone?
kyuu - Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - link
Real-world battery life is much better than the tests suggest. I'm not sure if there's an issue with how Brett is doing the testing or what, but it's definitely not right.Battery recharge time was skewed due to Brett not being able to use the proper charger.
Harping on a non-removable battery nowadays is just silly.
IE on WP doesn't have the best benchmark scores, but those benchmarks are largely useless anyway. They've all been optimized and cheated on by everyone. In real usage, I don't notice any difference in web page load times on my Lumia 920 (which has a much slower SoC than the reviewed 930) as compared to any flagship Android or iPhone.
WP has plenty of apps, including some really nice ones that can't be found on other platforms. Harping on the app store thing at this point is ignorant.
Buy whatever smartphone platform you like, but kindly don't cherry-pick a few tidbits from a single problematic review to support what is likely your preexisting bias against the WP platform.
notposting - Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - link
I upgraded from the 928 to the Icon, and putting them side by side running WP8/GDR3 with the same apps, performance is basically identical.The Icon pulls away in loading times, and has a slight advantage in browsing, but otherwise even the older dual cores run fine.
Put the Icon up against the LG G3 I shipped out yesterday and web browsing was a wash.
Of course, the camera on the 928 blew them both away in very low light situations, so there's that. :P
Klimax - Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - link
"One thing that Anand has harped on with regards to Windows Phone is that it is often on a much older SoC than competitive Android phones. This delta in performance is difficult to turn a blind eye to, even for supporters of the platform."What for. In general you don't need that power. (For exceptions there are some games like Total Defense 3D, which can slow down massively)
Delta in performance often doesn't translate in better experience...
suandantal - Wednesday, September 10, 2014 - link
I just bought this device (live in europe) and I love it! Just sold my old company phone IPhone 5 which I've never really used that much, IOS just doesn't cut it for me I guess although I do love the Hardware. Currently I own a nexus 5 as well as this green lumia 930 as well as the old 920. Lumia 930 is definitely an upgrade over the 920, although battery life isn't as good as it should be. Everyone should give WP a try... so try a lumia 630/635 they're like 100-150$, yet really delivers a very good experience.dirtyvu - Sunday, September 21, 2014 - link
It can't be emphasized enough how great the RAW feature is. I've personally not been impressed by most smartphone pictures. They're great... for smartphone pictures. But after running the 929/930 RAW pictures through Adobe Camera Raw, these are amazing pictures. Pictures I can show as equal or superior to "real" cameras.