Gaming Benchmarks

F1 2013

First up is F1 2013 by Codemasters. I am a big Formula 1 fan in my spare time, and nothing makes me happier than carving up the field in a Caterham, waving to the Red Bulls as I drive by (because I play on easy and take shortcuts). F1 2013 uses the EGO Engine, and like other Codemasters games ends up being very playable on old hardware quite easily. In order to beef up the benchmark a bit, we devised the following scenario for the benchmark mode: one lap of Spa-Francorchamps in the heavy wet, the benchmark follows Jenson Button in the McLaren who starts on the grid in 22nd place, with the field made up of 11 Williams cars, 5 Marussia and 5 Caterham in that order. This puts emphasis on the CPU to handle the AI in the wet, and allows for a good amount of overtaking during the automated benchmark. We test at 1920x1080 on Ultra graphical settings.

F1 2013 SLI, Average FPS


In all combinations, the 8370E and the 8150 duke it out. F1 2013 seems to be an Intel dominated title, given the i3 and outperform the FX-9590.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite was Zero Punctuation’s Game of the Year for 2013, uses the Unreal Engine 3, and is designed to scale with both cores and graphical prowess. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Bioshock Infinite SLI, Average FPS


The FX-8350 again fits in just beneath the FX-8150, but for a lower power consumption.

Tomb Raider

The next benchmark in our test is Tomb Raider. Tomb Raider is an AMD optimized game, lauded for its use of TressFX creating dynamic hair to increase the immersion in game. Tomb Raider uses a modified version of the Crystal Engine, and enjoys raw horsepower. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Tomb Raider SLI, Average FPS


Tomb Raider continues to be CPU agnostic, even around the FX quad thread CPUs.

Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs is a benchmarking wet dream – a highly complex benchmark that can bring the toughest setup and high resolutions down into single figures. Having an extreme SSAO setting can do that, but at the right settings Sleeping Dogs is highly playable and enjoyable. We run the basic benchmark program laid out in the Adrenaline benchmark tool, and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Sleeping Dogs SLI, Average FPS


The eight threads offers some advantage in minimum frame rates, but average frame rates are still around the FX-8150.

Battlefield 4

The EA/DICE series that has taken countless hours of my life away is back for another iteration, using the Frostbite 3 engine. AMD is also piling its resources into BF4 with the new Mantle API for developers, designed to cut the time required for the CPU to dispatch commands to the graphical sub-system. For our test we use the in-game benchmarking tools and record the frame time for the first ~70 seconds of the Tashgar single player mission, which is an on-rails generation of and rendering of objects and textures. We test at 1920x1080 at Ultra settings.

Battlefield 4 SLI, Average FPS


The FX-8370E stretches its legs a little in terms of minimum frame rates, particularly in SLI, however it is handily beaten by the i3-4330.

CPU Benchmarks AMD FX-8370E Conclusion
Comments Locked

107 Comments

View All Comments

  • royalcrown - Tuesday, September 16, 2014 - link

    http://s1191.photobucket.com/user/drinkoldcoke/lib...

    Absolutely stock settings with nothing turned off win 8.1 x64. Clicked Auto OC to 4.6; So 10k is really good, what about other apps ? Why does it do so badly in gaming then ?
  • TauxiC - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Not my fault your a braindead consumer willing to pay more than twice as much for a CPU that ultimately delivers the same performance. I have to hand it to you though, you are 100% correct, Intel IS STANDING STILL when their 2014 processors match that of AMD's 2012 offerings.
    http://imgur.com/J6RoBXO
  • bebimbap - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    it is interesting you are comparing your OC'd 8350(4.7g) vs stock 3770k(3.5g) and a stock 4770k(3.5g). since if you oc'd the i7s they would make "mincemeat" of your scores too. now if your comparing pure performance per dollar then yes your amd chip is better ratio on that one particular test than intel's offerings. BUT an intel system doesn't produce as much heat as an AMD system. for the same noise level, almost silent, I can run a 4770k(4.5g) @ 1.4v with the stock cooler. Stable enough to run all my games and stay <80C. how loud must the 8350(4.7g) be to to get a score of 11k on passmark?

    i'm not a intel fan boy, just saying passmark isn't the only facet of a cpu that you should look for unless benching passmark is all you do. because then anyone can say a $70(not on sale) G3258(4.7g) single threaded cinebench scoring 173 makes "mincemeat" of a $159(on sale) 8350(stock) scoring 88
  • yannigr2 - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Piledriver cpus and motherboards with 760G chipset. Nothing more to say.
  • jardows2 - Thursday, September 4, 2014 - link

    Except for those who don't know the significance of this combination. Many 760G motherboards will support ECC RAM, and all the current AMD processors support full virtualization. Using this for a cheap, high thread count home server, where I would have to spend several hundred dollars more to get similar server performance from an Intel product.
  • bebimbap - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Ian, I LOVE that i7 990x in the tests I'm still running a i7 920 on my x58 system as my secondary it's still snappy with an SSD of course.
  • Burticus - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Hello, ASUS? Can you PLEASE update the Bios for my AM3 socket M4N75TD motherboard to support this new 95w CPU? Pretty please?
  • wintermute000 - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Interesting option for home server/virt labbing. 8 cores for much cheaper than the intel equivalent. I do hope its ECC and VT-D compatible on the mobos.
  • Laststop311 - Wednesday, September 3, 2014 - link

    didnt realize the pcie lanes were not directly connected to the fx cpu's wow what trash.
  • TiGr1982 - Thursday, September 4, 2014 - link

    It not a trash, it's just an old design back from 2009, essentially.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now