CPU Benchmarks

The dynamics of CPU Turbo modes, with both Intel and AMD, can cause concern during environments with a variable threaded workload. There is also an added issue of the motherboard remaining consistent, depending on how the motherboard manufacturer wants to add in their own boosting technologies over the ones that Intel would prefer they used. In order to remain consistent, we implement an OS-level unique high performance mode on all the CPUs we test which should override any motherboard manufacturer performance mode.

HandBrake v0.9.9: link

For HandBrake, we take two videos (a 2h20 640x266 DVD rip and a 10min double UHD 3840x4320 animation short) and convert them to x264 format in an MP4 container. Results are given in terms of the frames per second processed, and HandBrake uses as many threads as possible.

HandBrake v0.9.9 LQ Film

HandBrake v0.9.9 2x4K

Handbrake balances cores and frequency, with the LQ film test often condensing CPUs based on frequency and the double UHD test expanding by cores. The double UHD test puts the 8370E at the bottom of the AMD 8-thread CPUs as expected.

Agisoft Photoscan – 2D to 3D Image Manipulation: link

Agisoft Photoscan creates 3D models from 2D images, a process which is very computationally expensive. The algorithm is split into four distinct phases, and different phases of the model reconstruction require either fast memory, fast IPC, more cores, or even OpenCL compute devices to hand. Agisoft supplied us with a special version of the software to script the process, where we take 50 images of a stately home and convert it into a medium quality model. This benchmark typically takes around 15-20 minutes on a high end PC on the CPU alone, with GPUs reducing the time.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Total Time

Photoscan results seem to take the following order: i7, i5, FX (8), FX (6), i3, FX (4), A10, A8.  The 8370E sits at the bottom of the FX 8-thread section as before.

WinRAR 5.0.1: link

WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB

WinRAR takes advantage of all the AMD threads due to its integer workloads.

PCMark8 v2 OpenCL

A new addition to our CPU testing suite is PCMark8 v2, where we test the Work 2.0 and Creative 3.0 suites in OpenCL mode. As this test is new, we have not run it on many AMD systems yet and will do so as soon as we can.

PCMark8 v2 Work 2.0 OpenCL with R7 240 DDR3

PCMark8 v2 Creative 3.0 OpenCL with R7 240 DDR3

The PCMark8 tests both seem to favor frequency at this point, with the FX-9590 taking the lead.

Hybrid x265

Hybrid is a new benchmark, where we take a 4K 1500 frame video and convert it into an x265 format without audio. Results are given in frames per second.

Hybrid x265, 4K Video

Again, more threads gives an intesting workload.  The FX-8370E beats out the i5-4690K as well.

Cinebench R15

Cinebench R15 - Single Threaded

Cinebench R15 - Multi-Threaded

Unfortunately the Achilles heel strikes again in single threaded performance.  Multithreaded puts it just behind the FX-8150.

3D Particle Movement

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and results are given in seconds.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

Web Benchmarks

On the lower end processors, general usability is a big factor of experience, especially as we move into the HTML5 era of web browsing. For our web benchmarks, we take four well known tests with Chrome 35 as a consistent browser.

Sunspider 1.0.2

Sunspider 1.0.2

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Kraken 1.1

WebXPRT

WebXPRT

Google Octane v2

Google Octane v2

AMD FX-8370E CPU Review: Vishera Down to 95W, Price Cuts for FX Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

107 Comments

View All Comments

  • royalcrown - Tuesday, September 16, 2014 - link

    http://s1191.photobucket.com/user/drinkoldcoke/lib...

    Absolutely stock settings with nothing turned off win 8.1 x64. Clicked Auto OC to 4.6; So 10k is really good, what about other apps ? Why does it do so badly in gaming then ?
  • TauxiC - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Not my fault your a braindead consumer willing to pay more than twice as much for a CPU that ultimately delivers the same performance. I have to hand it to you though, you are 100% correct, Intel IS STANDING STILL when their 2014 processors match that of AMD's 2012 offerings.
    http://imgur.com/J6RoBXO
  • bebimbap - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    it is interesting you are comparing your OC'd 8350(4.7g) vs stock 3770k(3.5g) and a stock 4770k(3.5g). since if you oc'd the i7s they would make "mincemeat" of your scores too. now if your comparing pure performance per dollar then yes your amd chip is better ratio on that one particular test than intel's offerings. BUT an intel system doesn't produce as much heat as an AMD system. for the same noise level, almost silent, I can run a 4770k(4.5g) @ 1.4v with the stock cooler. Stable enough to run all my games and stay <80C. how loud must the 8350(4.7g) be to to get a score of 11k on passmark?

    i'm not a intel fan boy, just saying passmark isn't the only facet of a cpu that you should look for unless benching passmark is all you do. because then anyone can say a $70(not on sale) G3258(4.7g) single threaded cinebench scoring 173 makes "mincemeat" of a $159(on sale) 8350(stock) scoring 88
  • yannigr2 - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Piledriver cpus and motherboards with 760G chipset. Nothing more to say.
  • jardows2 - Thursday, September 4, 2014 - link

    Except for those who don't know the significance of this combination. Many 760G motherboards will support ECC RAM, and all the current AMD processors support full virtualization. Using this for a cheap, high thread count home server, where I would have to spend several hundred dollars more to get similar server performance from an Intel product.
  • bebimbap - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Ian, I LOVE that i7 990x in the tests I'm still running a i7 920 on my x58 system as my secondary it's still snappy with an SSD of course.
  • Burticus - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Hello, ASUS? Can you PLEASE update the Bios for my AM3 socket M4N75TD motherboard to support this new 95w CPU? Pretty please?
  • wintermute000 - Tuesday, September 2, 2014 - link

    Interesting option for home server/virt labbing. 8 cores for much cheaper than the intel equivalent. I do hope its ECC and VT-D compatible on the mobos.
  • Laststop311 - Wednesday, September 3, 2014 - link

    didnt realize the pcie lanes were not directly connected to the fx cpu's wow what trash.
  • TiGr1982 - Thursday, September 4, 2014 - link

    It not a trash, it's just an old design back from 2009, essentially.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now