Platform Power

In the weeks leading up to this review there seemed to be a litany of headlines crowning the G3 as the new king of the battery life hill in the Android space. Our own battery life results disagreed with the conclusions but I wanted something a bit more concrete. Thankfully with a removable back cover and removable battery, instrumenting the G3 for power analysis is just as easy as it is on the Galaxy S5. Just like we did in our Galaxy S5 review, we measured device level power (with the display enabled) running a number of workloads. As always, all displays were calibrated to the same brightness level (200 nits, full white). Note that we are looking at average power here, not energy consumption. The latter is really what you want to report but for our needs here average power should be good enough.

At idle looking at a white screen the G3 uses more power than a Galaxy S5. Here we see the real burden of using LG's 2560 x 1440 panel, lighting up that many pixels definitely takes its toll on power consumption. Compared to the GS4 however, LG's G3 is an improvement. When asleep and in pocket the GS5 has a negligible advantage, the G3 is fairly close and is clearly better than the Snapdragon 600 based GS4.

The SunSpider results give you the other datapoint that should put to rest the G3's power consumption story. Under a heavy CPU load, the GS5 still manages lower overall platform power although the G3 again is better than the GS4. The SunSpider numbers combined with the idle/white screen numbers are enough to tell the story about G3's battery life vs. Galaxy S5. The G3 has a 5% larger battery but the potential gap in power consumption is much larger.

The video capture, camera preview and GFXBench results are interesting to look at but I wouldn't conclude much here other than to say that the G3 as a platform can consume quite a bit of power under load. For a better look at these scenarios we'd need to integrate power consumption over time to calculate energy usage, which as I mentioned before was beyond what we really needed to do for this review.

The main point here is to settle the debate about the G3's battery life. Yes, it has a larger battery than the Galaxy S5, but that doesn't mean it'll last longer on a single charge. I won't comment on reasons that other battery life tests would conclude differently.

Battery Life and Charge Time Camera Architecture
Comments Locked

174 Comments

View All Comments

  • Midwayman - Friday, July 11, 2014 - link

    By the time VR on your phone is a 'thing' you'll have been through a couple more phones most likely.
  • soldier4343 - Thursday, July 17, 2014 - link

    So on your book we should stick with 1080p forever...
  • Tyler_Durden_83 - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    MSM8974AC 2.45 GHz Snapdragon 400
    I don't think that you meant 400 :)
  • JoshHo - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    Whoops. Fixed, it should be correct now.
  • dyc4ha - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    Do you mean Snapdragon 801 in the table?
  • JoshHo - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    Yes. I distinctly recall fixing this same exact typo too. Not sure what happened there.
  • editorsorgtfo - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    IMO the stacked-battery issue is a red herring. Removable batteries haven't hurt Samsung's battery life versus their competition, and a stacked battery didn't break any runtime records for the Moto X. (OTOH, 720p didn't seem to help the Moto X's runtime either, which is odd considering how 1440p hurt the G3 here.)
  • JoshHo - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    The stacked battery design does increase volumetric efficiency. The LG G2 and Galaxy S5 are about the same size in the hand, yet the G2 has a noticeably larger battery. The Moto X is another discussion entirely as it was on a much less power efficient process and the AMOLED technology in the Moto X had much higher power draw than the LCDs available at the time.
  • SleepyFE - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    My old phone once froze so bad i couldn't turn it off by holding the off button. Removing the battery was the only way to get it to work again. I think that's a big enough deal to keep the battery removable.
  • darwinosx - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    No that would be bad hardware and software design.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now