Gaming Notebooks Are Thriving

Wrapping things up, I’ll include a gallery of NVIDIA’s slides at the end, but let’s quickly go over a few interesting items. NVIDIA provided some research showing that PC gaming is an extremely large industry – competing in yearly revenue with the likes of movie theater ticket sales, music, and DVD/Blu-ray video sales. Along with that growth, growth in the gaming notebooks market has been significant over the past three years, and even greater growth is expected for 2014. A large part of that is no doubt thanks to Optimus, as it allows potentially any notebook to deliver good gaming performance when you need it while not absolutely killing battery life when you don’t need the GPU. The other aspect is that we are simply seeing more GTX class notebooks shipping, thanks to GPUs like the GTX 760M/765M, and with the 850M now moving into the GTX class (which is where NVIDIA draws the line for “gaming notebooks”) we’ll see even more. But it’s not just about names; the following slide is a great illustration of what we’ve seen since 2011:

It’s not too hard to guess what the notebook on the left is (hello Alienware M17x R3), while on the right it looks like Gigabyte’s P34G. That’s not really important, but the difference in size is pretty incredible, and what’s more, the laptop on the right s actually 30% faster with GTX 850M than the GTX 580M from 2011. It also happens to deliver better battery life – gaming or otherwise. Leaner, lighter, and faster are all good things for gaming notebooks. As you would expect, there are quite a few GTX 800M notebooks coming out soon or in the very near future (while most other 800M parts will mostly come a bit later). NVIDIA provided the following images along with some other information on upcoming laptops, so if you’re in the market keep an eye out for the following (in alphabetical order).

The Alienware 17 will be updated to support both the GTX 870M and GTX 880M. ASUS’ G750JZ will update the G750JH and move from GTX 780M to GTX 880M (and apparently Optimus will be enabled this round). Gigabyte will have new versions of the P34G, the P34R with 860M and the P34J with 850M, an updated P35R (P35K core design) with 860M, and apparently updates to the P25 and P27 as well (likely with mainstream 800M class GPUs, so specifics haven’t been given yet). Lenovo’s Y50 will be their now gaming notebook, with a single GTX 860M and an optional high-DPI display. MSI will also be updating their GT70, GT60, GS70, and GS60; the GT models will support GTX 880M and 870M while the GS models will support the GTX 870M and 860M. And finally (though I suspect we’ll see Clevo, Toshiba, and Samsung announce products with GTX 800M GPUs at some point, along with perhaps some other OEMs as well), Razer Blade will have a new 14” Blade with GTX 870M and a 17” Blade Pro with GTX 860M – and no, that’s not a typo, though perhaps we’ll see more than one model of Blade Pro as it seems odd for the smaller laptop to support a faster GPU.

Finally, on the topic of the need for discrete GPUs in laptops, NVIDIA noted that over 85% of the top 30 games (according to NPD/Steam sales) remain unplayable with Intel’s HD 4400 (no surprise, as that’s basically the same performance as HD 4000), while 75% still remain unplayable with Iris 5100 – this is using 1366x768 resolution with “default settings” (presumably medium, but it’s not specifically stated). What’s missing is information on what’s playable with Iris Pro, but while I can say that most games I’ve tested on Iris Pro are able to break 30FPS average frame rates, ironically power use on the i7-4750HQ laptop I’ve tested is actually worse when gaming than most laptops with GT class 700M GPUs. NVIDIA shows this in their results as well, and while I can’t verify the numbers they claim to provide better performance with a 840M than Iris Pro 5200 while using less than half as much power.

Intel has certainly improved their iGPU performance with the last several processor generations, but unfortunately the higher performance has often come only when given more power – so for example a GT2 or GT3 Haswell part limited to 15W total TDP (i.e. in an Ultrabook) is typically no better than a GT2 Ivy Bridge part with a 17W TDP. Broadwell will likely bring us a “GT4” part (to go along with GT3e), but we’ll have to see if Intel is able to improve performance within the same power envelope when those parts start shipping later this year.

Other Features: GameStream, ShadowPlay, Optimus, etc. Closing Thoughts
Comments Locked

91 Comments

View All Comments

  • MrSpadge - Wednesday, March 12, 2014 - link

    Only if you equate the next gen consoles with the PS4. The XBone (~HD7790) is about matched by GTX750Ti.
  • rish95 - Wednesday, March 12, 2014 - link

    Are you sure? As far as I know, the 750 Ti outperforms the PS4 in Battlefield 4 and the XBone in Titanfall.
  • jasonelmore - Thursday, March 13, 2014 - link

    it plays titanfall on medium settings @1080p 60FPS.. The Xbox One is using similar settings but only rendering at 760p then upscaled. So yes, it's faster if you dismiss variables like CPU and Platform performance.

    No real way to compare unless someone pops in a Steamroller cpu with 750 Ti
  • rish95 - Thursday, March 13, 2014 - link

    While that would be nice to see, I don't think that's the point. The OP said the 750 Ti can't make for a viable gaming platform compared to current gen consoles, because it is "slower."

    Clearly it can. It's outperforming both consoles with some CPU/platform setups. The 860Ms in these laptops would likely be paired with i5s and i7s, which will yield much better CPU performance than the Steamroller APUs in the consoles.
  • sheh - Wednesday, March 12, 2014 - link

    860M and 860M. That's nice. A new low in obfuscation of actual specs?
  • schizoide - Wednesday, March 12, 2014 - link

    Agreed, I also found that disgusting.
  • MrSpadge - Wednesday, March 12, 2014 - link

    Exactly. Especially since the "860M (Kepler)" is crippled by its memory bus. What's the point of putting such a large, powerful and expensive chip in there when many shaders are deactivated and not even the remaining ones can use their full performance potential. You also can't make a huge chip as energy efficient as a smaller one by disabling parts of it.

    GK106 with full shaders, 192 bit bus and moderate clocks would have been more economic and at least as powerful, probably a bit faster depending on game and settings.

    Yet regarding power efficiency "860M (Maxwell)" destroys both of these configurations, which makes them rather redundant. Especially since it should be cheaper for nVidia to produce the GM107. Do they have so many GK104 left to throw away?
  • En1gma - Wednesday, March 12, 2014 - link

    > 800M will be a mix of both Kepler and Maxwell parts
    and even Fermi: 820m is GF108-based
  • En1gma - Wednesday, March 12, 2014 - link

    or GF117..
  • r3loaded - Wednesday, March 12, 2014 - link

    Why does Nvidia persist with the GT/GTX prefixes? They're largely meaningless as people just go off the 3-digit model number.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now