Display on mobile devices is one area where we’ve seen considerable improvement. Pixel density has gone up, contrast ratios have improved, and the emphasis on low power in a platform gated by its battery size means there’s always innovation happening.

In the case of the Nexus 5, there’s a considerable jump in resolution, from the WXGA 1280x768 display on the Nexus 4, to the now-standard 1080p. The biggest change is an obvious shift in aspect ratio from 15:9 to 16:9 once more. Back with the Nexus 4 and Optimus G, I noted just how surprisingly noticeable that extra 48 pixels of width was. Although we tend to think in absolute display resolution and talk about it quite a bit, Android uses display independent pixels or dips in order to keep layouts display density agnostic and support a wide variety of screen sizes and resolutions. Nexus 5 implements the 480 ppi or xxhdpi screen density, whereas Nexus 4 implements 320 ppi or xhdpi density. The result is that the Nexus 5’s display is 360x592 dips in size, compared to 384x592 dips for the Nexus 4, coming in 24 dips narrower. It’s important to note however that this change is intentional to maintain Android’s DPI independence, even if it does mean less overall real-estate in apps and browser.

Display quality is a big deal in the Android space, with lots of variance between devices. In the case of the Nexus 5, I started by tracking down the display type. If you recall, 5-inches with 1080p is a resolution we’ve seen before in the Droid DNA and Butterfly. From what I can tell, the Nexus 5 uses a very similar evolved version of that panel, a JDI (Japan Display, Inc) 1080p display with in-cell touch courtesy Synaptics ClearPad 3350 solution.



The other question was whether Nexus 5 also uses a PSR (Panel Self Refresh) type display. This display is indeed a MIPI command mode panel, the same kind of system, so yes it does include those features. An additional change is the addition of software vsync in Android 4.4, which to my knowledge the Nexus 5 does use, you can see this pop on and off depending on what’s happening on-screen if you monitor surfaceflinger. Those improvements should decrease latency and improve how sticky animations feel.

To characterize display quality and accuracy, we turn to our usual display measurements.

Brightness (White)

Brightness (Black)

Contrast Ratio

The Nexus 5 doesn’t go quite as bright as Nexus 4, but it’s still a very bright display. Blacks and contrast are a bit disappointing though, contrast is definitely on the lower end, but not bad. I definitely haven’t been put off by them. I also haven’t noticed any of the distracting dynamic brightness behavior I have on other handsets, which is awesome.

My only criticism is that I wish Nexus 5 would allow its auto screen brightness algorithm to go dimmer when in dark scenarios. There’s still more dynamic range in the manual brightness setting bar than there is for the auto brightness routine from what I can tell.

CalMAN Display Performance - White Point Average

 



CalMAN Display Performance - Saturations Average dE 2000

 

 



CalMAN Display Performance - Grayscale Average dE 2000

 



CalMAN Display Performance - Gretag Macbeth Average dE 2000

 

The new Nexus 7 impressed me with how accurate its display was in terms of color reproduction, beginning with Google stating it targeted sRGB (the color space for both the web and Android) calibration for it. The Nexus 5 seems to have done the same, and wowed me with the best GMB color checker Delta-Es we’ve seen from any Android handset. In addition, the Nexus 5 has none of the saturation boost that’s sadly quite pervasive right now, instead giving the right evenly spaced saturation stepping on its color channels. The Nexus 7 has slightly lower Delta-E, but it’s clear to me that Google has made color calibration an emphasis on the Nexus line.

It’s interesting to hear some Nexus 5 users complain that the display seems undersaturated, since that kind of end user feedback reflects subjective comparison. It also suggests to me that a large percentage of the population doesn’t know what some colors or system elements actually should be. Even for me, looking at the green elements inside the Google Play store on the Note 3 in movie mode or Nexus 5 initially seemed slightly more muted than normal. The reality is that this is what they actually should look like. We’ve just become accustomed to their oversaturated appearance on virtually every other device.

This kind of expectation about what looks right and what doesn’t is rather telling for the state of display calibration in Android handsets, and how OEMs have used oversaturated colors to increase retail shelf appeal. Unfortunately the reality is that oversaturated colors do seem to win taste tests among shoppers, the same way that TVs in most big boxes do. We’ve been looking at them for so long that well calibrated displays like Nexus 5 initially do look noticeably different.

The end result is easy to sum up, however – Nexus 5 has the best calibrated display I’ve seen so far in any Android handset. It’s also leaps and bounds more accurate and controlled than its predecessor display in the Nexus 4.

Throttling and Performance Analysis Camera Analysis - Stills and Video
Comments Locked

231 Comments

View All Comments

  • mike8675309 - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    On the lenses, isn't the lens the magnetic part, not the ring? Thus as long as the ring around the lens is made from a ferromagnetic material the lens would attach. n'est-ce pas?
  • NeoteriX - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    How come we can't see the Qi charger magnetic mounting points on this? Or am I not looking at this correctly?
  • blind2haters - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/cell-phone-... Here I did ur research for u.
  • NeoteriX - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    ...what are you showing? That it's possible to glue a magnetic mount onto a phone and use magnetic lenses? Yeah, we already knew that and it's not Nexus 5 specific.
  • skiboysteve - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    "Google can claim that SMS and IM are now merged nicely together under one roof, but it’s still two basically two discrete threads and views. It’s amazing to me that it’s 2013 and nobody has still been able to merge the two together the same way WebOS did with the Palm Pre."

    Windows Phone 8 does this perfectly with SMS and Facebook and Messenger using the same thread with a switch button to switch between them.
  • rwei - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    I see you beat me to it, oops
  • errorr - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    Unfortunately that is a relevant as palmOS doing it to me...
  • hrrmph - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    If its important enough to you, find a BB-OS10 device to play with for awhile. ALL communications data is in one integrated list (SMS, Call Data, Email Accounts, Notifications, etc.). Incredibly time saving and easy.

    I bought the BB Z10 as a stopgap phone that I could wear on my belt and play my music for me while I waited for Samsung to offer something in the same size range. Dunno if I'll ever go there now.

    I'm so hooked on the convenience and speed of the BB-OS10 Hub. I'm also hooked on the MS Windows-like multi-tasking windows.

    Now I find myself getting a bit irritated when I use an Android, iOS, or WinPhone device. By comparison to the Blackberry, the "communications channels" seem fragmented and disorganized on those devices.

    I never used a Blackberry before the Z10 so I have nothing to say about whatever happened in the past, but for an actual "phone" and communicator, based on my Z10 experience, I dread the thought of them exiting the market.

    People ramble on about Linux, but for my money, WebOS and BB-OS10 are the ones who pushed / are pushing the market in the right direction.

    I realize Linux has great underpinnings, but great GUI design is where its "at" when time is money, or time is satisfaction.
  • SpaceRanger - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    No Removable Battery?? No thank you.. I'll pass.
  • Tetracycloide - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    It's removable has in 'replace the battery with relatively little effort if it stops holding a charge' but not has in 'bring a spare camping to swap out for more juice.' Decide accordingly.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now