The GeForce GTX 660 Ti Review, Feat. EVGA, Zotac, and Gigabyte
by Ryan Smith on August 16, 2012 9:00 AM ESTCrysis: Warhead
Kicking things off as always is Crysis: Warhead. It’s no longer the toughest game in our benchmark suite, but it’s still a technically complex game that has proven to be a very consistent benchmark. Thus even four years since the release of the original Crysis, “but can it run Crysis?” is still an important question, and the answer continues to be “no.” While we’re closer than ever, full Enthusiast settings at a 60fps is still beyond the grasp of a single-GPU card.
For a $300 performance card the most important resolution is typically going to be 1920x1080/1200, however in some cases these cards should be able to cover 2560x1440/1600 at a reasonable framerate. To that end, we’ll be focusing on 1920x1200 for the bulk of our review.
Crysis has been a sore spot for NVIDIA since the launch of Kepler, and GTX 660 Ti doesn’t improve this. Since it’s a memory bandwidth constrained game and GTX 660 Ti takes away 25% of GK104’s memory bandwidth, the result is a predictable drop in performance. The GTX 660 Ti only reaches 80% of the GTX 670’s performance here, which is only a bit more than our worst case scenario of 75%. At 38.8fps it’s playable, but it’s definitely not a great experience. So for anyone wanting to partake in this classic, an AMD card is the way to go and it doesn’t matter which; even the 7870 is marginally faster.
As for our factory overclocked cards from Zotac, EVGA, and Gigabyte, while they improve the situation they don’t do so by a great deal. Unexpectedly, despite its memory bandwidth advantage the Gigabyte card actually edges out the Zotac card here, due to the former’s higher power target allowing it to boost to higher clockspeeds. Still that’s only a 4% improvement, far below what these kinds of overclocks are really capable of hitting.
Looking at minimum framerates is even more grim; the GTX 660 Ti is experiencing its worst case scenario. Crysis, Kepler, and low memory bandwidth are a very bad combination here. As for the factory overclocked cards, the Zotac card finally takes the lead thanks to its memory overclock, but like our average framerates in Crysis it’s not a particularly big jump.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
313 Comments
View All Comments
Ryan Smith - Thursday, August 16, 2012 - link
Long story short, we were having CMS problems earlier so we were messing with the URL slugs. Not that the slugs actually matter, but it's been fixed.Belard - Thursday, August 16, 2012 - link
Slugs are important for soil health. slimy and kind of icky looking... they are good to have.Natfly - Thursday, August 16, 2012 - link
Not to mention search engine optimizationBelard - Thursday, August 16, 2012 - link
I see that.... oops.bhima - Thursday, August 16, 2012 - link
You show $399, but the MSRP is $319.CeriseCogburn - Sunday, August 19, 2012 - link
A lot of em are going for $299, but why put anything in there but RELEASE PRICE on the chart - that way you can show the GTX570 at $349.Bias ? You decide.
BoloMKXXVIII - Thursday, August 16, 2012 - link
blanarahul, very insiteful comment.The GTX 660 Ti seems like a good "bang for your buck" card. NVidia should count itself lucky for having trouble keeping up with demand. My worry is they lose focus with the number of markets they are trying to fill. Something I am sure AMD will be watching for.
CeriseCogburn - Sunday, August 19, 2012 - link
Yes nVidia sure loses focus - uhh... loses focus...sales GREAT - loses focus...Biased stupidity ?
You decide.
What it means ?
No one knows.
Galidou - Tuesday, August 21, 2012 - link
They're not loosing focus, it's a new strategy and it must work wonders. Instead of releasing new products as quickly as possible and fill the market with all the parts from low to high-end performance, they get out the new higher-end parts and rely on their last gen cards to fill the holes.Clean out the shelves so dealers don't get stuck with older technology not selling. And at the same time, not taxing new fabrication process(28nm in this case) by needing alot more to fill demand in every way.
Crazyeyeskillah - Thursday, August 16, 2012 - link
If they had released this at 249$ they would have never been able to supply the demand. . .why not just go for the jugular of amd? Oh yeah balance and perceived value in the market, only hurts us really.