Improved Turbo

Trinity features a much improved version of AMD's Turbo Core technology compared to Llano. First and foremost, both CPU and GPU turbo are now supported. In Llano only the CPU cores could turbo up if there was additional TDP headroom available, while the GPU cores ran no higher than their max specified frequency. In Trinity, if the CPU cores aren't using all of their allocated TDP but the GPU is under heavy load, it can exceed its typical max frequency to capitalize on the available TDP. The same obviously works in reverse.

Under the hood, the microcontroller that monitors all power consumption within the APU is much more capable. In Llano, the Turbo Core microcontroller looked at activity on the CPU/GPU and performed a static allocation of power based on this data. In Trinity, AMD implemented a physics based thermal calculation model using fast transforms. The model takes power and translates it into a dynamic temperature calculation. Power is still estimated based on workload, which AMD claims has less than a 1% error rate, but the new model gets accurate temperatures from those estimations. The thermal model delivers accuracy at or below 2C, in real time. Having more accurate thermal data allows the turbo microcontroller to respond quicker, which should allow for frequencies to scale up and down more effectively.

At the end of the day this should improve performance, although it's difficult to compare directly to Llano since so much has changed between the two APUs. Just as with Llano, AMD specifies nominal and max turbo frequencies for the Trinity CPU/GPU. 

A Beefy Set of Interconnects

The holy grail for AMD (and Intel for that matter) is a single piece of silicon with CPU and GPU style cores that coexist harmoniously, each doing what they do best. We're not quite there yet, but in pursuit of that goal it's important to have tons of bandwidth available on chip.

Trinity still features two 64-bit DDR3 memory controllers with support for up to DDR3-1866 speeds. The controllers add support for 1.25V memory. Notebook bound Trinities (Socket FS1r2 and Socket FP2) support up to 32GB of memory, while the desktop variants (Socket FM2) can handle up to 64GB.

Hyper Transport is gone as an external interconnect, leaving only PCIe for off-chip IO. The Fusion Control Link is a 128-bit (each direction) interface giving off-chip IO devices access to system memory. Trinity also features a 256-bit (in each direction, per memory channel) Radeon Memory Bus (RMB) direct access to the DRAM controllers. The excessive width of this bus likely implies that it's also used for CPU/GPU communication as well.

IOMMU v2 is also supported by Trinity, giving supported discrete GPUs (e.g. Tahiti) access to the CPU's virtual memory. In Llano, you used to take data from disk, copy it to memory, then copy it from the CPU's address space to pinned memory that's accessible by the GPU, then the GPU gets it and brings it into its frame buffer. By having access to the CPU's virtual address space now the data goes from disk, to memory, then directly to the GPU's memory—you skip that intermediate mem to mem copy. Eventually we'll get to the point where there's truly one unified address space, but steps like these are what will get us there.

The Trinity GPU

Trinity's GPU is probably the most well understood part of the chip, seeing as how its basically a cut down Cayman from AMD's Northern Islands family. The VLIW4 design features 6 SIMD engines, each with 16 VLIW4 arrays, for a total of up to 384 cores. The A10 SKUs get 384 cores while the lower end A8 and A6 parts get 256 and 192, respectively. FP64 is supported but at 1/16 the FP32 rate.

As AMD never released any low-end Northern Islands VLIW4 parts, Trinity's GPU is a bit unique. It technically has fewer cores than Llano's GPU, but as we saw with AMD's transition from VLIW5 to VLIW4, the loss didn't really impact performance but rather drove up efficiency. Remember that most of the time that 5th unit in AMD's VLIW5 architectures went unused.

The design features 24 texture units and 8 ROPs, in line with what you'd expect from what's effectively 1/4 of a Cayman/Radeon HD 6970. Clock speeds are obviously lower than a full blown Cayman, but not by a ton. Trinity's GPU runs at a normal maximum of 497MHz and can turbo up as high as 686MHz.

Trinity includes AMD's HD Media Accelerator, which includes accelerated video decode (UVD3) and encode components (VCE). Trinity borrows Graphics Core Next's Video Codec Engine (VCE) and is actually functional in the hardware/software we have here today. Don't get too excited though; the VCE enabled software we have today won't take advantage of the identical hardware in discrete GCN GPUs. AMD tells us this is purely a matter of having the resources to prioritize Trinity first, and that discrete GPU VCE support is coming.

Introduction and Piledriver Overview Mobile Trinity Lineup
Comments Locked

271 Comments

View All Comments

  • KompuKare - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    What AMD really needs is a better IMC. Look at this recent computerbase article on IB and RAM:
    http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/arbeitsspeicher...
    http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&...

    Unlike Llano IB doesn't perform a lot different as long it's running at DDR3-1600. Which to me says that Intel's IMC is a lot more efficient than AMD's. Ironic I know since AMD brought IMC to the x86 space, but the problem is that Intel have such a huge R&D budget compared to AMD.

    I'll be interested in Jarred trying that review sample with DDr3-1333 too.
  • Assimilator87 - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    A piece of my soul was crushed when I saw the HD 4000 ahead of Trinity. I don't care what the situation is, that should NEVER happen. 22nm and GCN can't come soon enough.
  • ET - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    While the HD 4000 still gets too low performance on occasion, I was generally impressed with it in this comparison. Intel GPUs have come a long way.

    As for Trinity, it looks like a well rounded solution. I'm more interested in the 17W version, as an alternative to Brazos. I like my Thinkpad x120e, and even run games on it occasionally, but it's still pretty weak.
  • ET - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    "PCI Express support in Trinity remains at PCEe 2.0"
  • althaz - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    I'd pay $700 for an ultrabook-type laptop with this in it - provided it had a 128Gb Samsung SSD, a decent keyboard and an above-average screen.

    Ideally I'd like to get a convertible tablet with windows 8 on it powered by this. In laptop mode it's a portable gaming machine, in tablet mode a pretty nice tablet. Something 11.6"ish akin to the Transformer Prime from Asus in form factor
  • Riek - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    Would it be possible to include power consumption (or batterly life) while gaming?

    Would it also be possible to add a cpu frequency - gpu frequency graph during some workloads? To see how turbo3.0 shapes up and how well the gpu turbo is implemented and used?

    From my understanding gpu gets priority in turbo, but a trinity at 2.3GHz will just limit the performance in gaming. I wonder if the turbo is shaped up like that.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    I noted battery life while looping 3DMark06 was 77 minutes. If we calculate power draw, that works out to around 43W. I also just checked AC power draw at the outlet during the same test, and the average power use was around 50W (45-55W range, but mostly right around 50). Accounting for AC adapter inefficiencies, if it's 80-85% efficient the laptop is using around 40-43W.
  • Riek - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    Yeah looked over that. So gaming wise llano is still a better option in regards to batterly life (alot better).

    Sandy bridge would be the worst choice. (as it gives the worst performance).

    I'm suprised trinity and IvyB are so close in terms of 3dmark06 performance and battery life.
  • deathpony - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    Hi, i have an AMD A6-3500
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2369937

    Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H

    AMD Radeon HD 6530D
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/63we6/

    For some reason i was able to Undervolt the APU and push the clock to 2 Ghz while retaining stability. Also by raising the clock this much i got performance increase in double digits, can you test it out with Trinity? Thanks!
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, May 15, 2012 - link

    Unfortunately, the Trinity BIOS is pretty much useless as far as undervolting/overclocking/etc. are concerned. I'd be interested in testing such items, but we'd need a far more capable BIOS/motherboard than this laptop has.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now