Recently Taiwanese vendor GeChic got in touch with us about a new product set to appear on American shores, the On-Lap 1301 laptop monitor. The concept? A portable 13" screen that affixes to the back of your notebook lid and swings out, extending your desktop space and powered by a USB 2.0 cable. The first inclination is to expect another DisplayLink peripheral, but the On-Lap 1301 actually uses HDMI or VGA out from your notebook, and thus dodges all of the pitfalls of using a USB-driven screen. So how effective is the On-Lap 1301? We took it for a test drive to find out if GeChic's screen is the productivity enhancer you were looking for.


GeChic is presently an exceedingly small company with just one product to their name, and that’s the one we have on hand. The On-Lap 1301 is a 13” screen that can use either suction cups to affix to the back of your notebook lid and hinge outward, or stand up using included rubber green stands. The On-Lap is basically as fresh as it gets; the instruction manual’s English is understandable, though a bit tenuous at times and occasionally light on detail. Still, it’s easy enough to divine how to use the screen. You can opt to use the included rubber green stands, but you’ll find them problematic for a variety of reasons we’ll get into in a bit.

First, there’s connecting the On-Lap. The only cables included in the box are the VGA and HDMI dongles; the USB power cable is tucked into a small area beneath the screen. There’s a panel that slides off, and from there you extend the cable out of the side. To the left are the two internal connectors for the screen, but this is where the On-Lap runs into its first major problem: both cables are routed out of the bottom of the screen, essentially making the stands next to impossible to use as the screen itself will always be propped up on the display cable itself. That’s probably fine, though; the stands themselves are flimsy and don’t have any direct way to actually connect to the screen, making them impractical in real world use. They strike me as an afterthought; the On-Lap is clearly designed to be affixed to the back of your notebook lid.

On that front things look much better. Four suction cups get screwed into the back of the mount, and the suction cups themselves are actually extremely effective. GeChic includes mylar pads which you can affix to your notebook lid (and then affix the suction cups to the pads), but I found them inessential: the flat surface of my ThinkPad’s lid was perfectly fine and suction was more than adequate. This is really the ideal way to use the On-Lap, with the screen hinging out to the right. It looks more than a little awkward on my 11.6” ThinkPad, but just about any 13” ultrabook or portable should be just fine. As for weight, while the On-Lap is about two pounds, I found that most notebooks should still be able to handle the weight without tipping. Since you can adjust how far out the screen swings and the screen itself is the heavy part, it’s not difficult at all to balance the two together.

Performance and Screen Quality
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Kristian Vättö - Saturday, January 21, 2012 - link

    USB 3.0 version would be cool as it delivers more power. It might even be enough for the data so it would be just one cable.
  • Nihility - Saturday, January 21, 2012 - link

    Don't forget that it's being powered off of the laptop battery. USB 3.0 gives you more power but that would come at the expense of battery life.
  • MonkeyPaw - Friday, January 20, 2012 - link

    I think I said a few months ago that this would be a better idea versus that 2 screen laptop that was reviewed. It allows for an extra screen, but only when you need it, and it requires no additional power source. The next step should be to put a Li-Ion battery on the back that can either power the monitor on its own, or provide reserve power for the laptop (which would require creative cabling, so probably a no-go). Either way, a thin battery would take one drawback away when it comes to portability.
  • YukaKun - Friday, January 20, 2012 - link

    Actually, the battery idea could be accomplished by adding a "backpack" to the display itself. Think of a cellphone battery width, screen size (or close to that). Should give the screen a good 10 hours of continuous use, right? It shouldn't give the display that much weight, also.

    I like the idea, but being productive "on the go" is a very niche market TBH (designers for the most part, maybe programmers). Hope they do well.

  • Meaker10 - Friday, January 20, 2012 - link

    Hmz, it would be interesting the crack open the shell and see what kind of cables are inside as you could look into putting your own panel in.
  • bennyg - Friday, January 20, 2012 - link

    Did you test off a standard USB 2.0 port only?

    Could this device draw more from a USB 3 (or over-spec USB2 port like on my P150HM which can supply more than 500mA) - and thus be brighter?

    Great effort for 500mA though. Hope this isn't a concept resigned to the "oh yeah whatever happened to that" bin of history.
  • Dustin Sklavos - Saturday, January 21, 2012 - link

    Tested off of USB 2.0 and USB 3.0, makes no difference that I could see.
  • max347 - Saturday, January 21, 2012 - link

    Is there any way we could get more pictures of it on a larger laptop? I really like this idea, but would want to see how it looks installed on something. I think the 'presentation mode' would actually be useful, wherein I could show other people at a table data without having to spin the laptop back and forth
  • chillmelt - Saturday, January 21, 2012 - link

    I'd buy it if it works on a Mac Mini. Such a setup sounds like a reasonable portable desktop. The wires could use some work, but I imagine they can be removed if not used.
  • Dustin Sklavos - Saturday, January 21, 2012 - link

    No reason it wouldn't. It just draws power off a standard USB 2.0 port and then uses HDMI or VGA for a video connection.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now