Ultrabook Wrap-Up

We’ve now looked at three 13.3” ultrabooks, plus the MacBook Air 11 and 13, and the ASUS UX21E. I’ve also had some hands on time at a local store with a Samsung Series 9, so that covers much of the ultrabook market right now. Unfortunately, I haven’t had a chance to see any of the Lenovo IdeaPad U300/U400 offerings or any other ultrabooks in person (yet), so I’ll have to leave them out of consideration.

Taken as a whole, the one thing these laptops are doing right is making really slim and amazing looking devices. For those in the generic Windows laptop world that don’t get to many coffee shops where the cool people hang out, the first encounter with an ultrabook is almost invariable one of amazement. “Wow! That’s an amazing looking laptop. Is it any good or does it just look cool?” I had several (non-techie) people come by while I worked on this review, and that was basically the reaction from every one of them. I agree on the first point: these ultrabooks really look sleek. The question of whether or not they’re good isn’t quite so clear.

Understand first and foremost that the target market for an ultrabook values aesthetics and portability over performance. There are dozens of laptops that cost less and offer more performance, but that’s not the point. The purpose of ultrabooks is to provide a fast, light business laptop that can last through most of a day’s workload and not weigh you down while you carry it around. If that’s what you’re after, the Acer S3, ASUS UX31E, and Toshiba Portege Z835—and very likely the Lenovo U300 and any other forthcoming ultrabooks—should keep you happy. Buy whichever one has the best price or most appealing look and you’re good to go. If you’re looking for other features, however, you’ll want to consider exactly what you get a bit more. Personally, I’d rather have a slightly bulkier laptop with a 1080p display, more connectivity options, and a discrete GPU for some moderate gaming—the Dell XPS 15z is still one of my favorites for walking the fine line between price, features, performance, and quality. But let’s assume you’ve decided you want an ultrabook; which one should you get?

For best build quality right now and aesthetic, out of the units I’ve seen I’d place the Apple MacBook Air and the ASUS Zenbooks at the top of the list. The aluminum unibody construction of the MBA makes for a very solid feeling laptop and the ASUS Zenbooks are right there with it. If you value screen quality over other elements, the MacBooks once again get a recommendation, but I also have to give props to the Samsung Series 9 13.3” model—it has a beautiful matte panel with a great contrast ratio, and colors look far better than on the ASUS, Acer, or Toshiba offerings. On the other hand, ASUS offers a very bright display and is the only 1600x900 resolution in a 13.3” ultrabook right now—at least a baby step over the status quo laptop LCDs.

Some people still value wired connectivity; for such users, Toshiba is the only ultrabook I’ve seen so far with an integrated Gigabit Ethernet port—and yes, I missed having GbE on both the Acer and ASUS; would it have killed them to at least include a 2x2:2 MIMO WiFi adapter? Acer lacks USB 3.0, so connectivity folks will likely want to go elsewhere. If you’re after a good keyboard, my initial experience is that all of the ultrabooks (including the MacBook Air) don’t have a lot of key travel, which may or may not bother you. Subjectively, however, I think the Samsung Series 9 was the most comfortable keyboard for me to type on, followed by the MacBook Air, with the others all rating as slightly behind those two; also worth noting is the MBA and Series 9 both have backlit keyboards. Finally, for best battery life, so far ASUS comes out quite a bit ahead of the others, thanks to a larger 48Wh battery and good power optimizations.

That covers most recommendations, but there’s still one more point to consider: cost. While the Acer S3 doesn’t place first in most areas, it’s still an ultra thin laptop that looks decent, and the 256GB C400 SSD is better than most of the other SSD options. ASUS got the 128GB SF-2200 SSD right in the UX21E, but the 256GB SanDisk U100 doesn’t look like it can even keep up with the second tier SSDs; considering the cost, I’d avoid ASUS’ 256GB models. Apple meanwhile charges the most by a fairly sizeable margin—shocking, I know—but if you look at the previous paragraph you’ll find that they warrant consideration on most categories.

The most reasonable conclusion is that you have to choose what’s most important, as you simply can’t get it all. You can get an $1100 ASUS UX31E that has similar or slightly better performance compared to the base model $1300 MacBook Air 13, you get a higher resolution and brighter LCD panel, and you get USB 3.0 support along with Windows 7. For $200 more, you get a higher contrast LCD with a 16:10 aspect ratio, Thunderbolt, a backlit keyboard, and OS X. If you already prefer OS X, the choice is very simple, but some Windows users might actually be willing to spend the additional money for an MBA13 ($300 extra when you factor in the Windows license). If I were to recommend just one ultrabook right now, the $1100 ASUS UX31E-DH52 gets my vote, but if you want more performance without breaking the bank, the Acer S3-951-6432 has everything you need except for a good LCD and USB 3.0 priced at $1230. If you want the MacBook equivalent of the Acer, you’ll have to pony up $1700 to get the same CPU and a 256GB SSD, though I’d say the LCD and improved build quality are worth at least $200.

The ultrabook market is still relatively new, and there are additional models coming out from other companies. As SSD prices drop, we’re likely to see better prices as well, and really we’d like to stick closer to $1000 for a 128GB SSD and a Core i5 CPU. We’d also like to see more attention to detail, particularly on the LCDs. For a 13.3” laptop, 1440x900 or 1600x900 is my preferred resolution, but along with that I’d like something that can handle the full sRGB color space and offer close to a 1000:1 contrast ratio—and an anti-glare surface would be icing on the cake. We’ll see if any of the upcoming ultrabooks can surpass the current offerings, which unfortunately end up looking very much like a revised take on attractive but expensive ultraportables. They're not bad, but they're also not the type of product we can universally recommend without pointing out some of the potential drawbacks.

And Then We Get to the LCDs…
Comments Locked

81 Comments

View All Comments

  • Hector2 - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link

    I think Intel has it right with the move to Ultrabooks, but these early SandyBridge-based models without Touch aren't what I'm looking for --- though much better than the old non-Ultrabook form factor.

    I'll get my Win 8 Ultrabook when there's one with a nice medium size, Touch screen model with Ivy Bridge inside, that has only an external wireless keyboard (no physical keyboard buttons on the UB itself), with wireless mouse and a Thunderbolt or Lightpeak connection for an external Monitor, when desired.

    This would serve as a nice, portable Touch tablet when I'm mobile but also able to use as a full blown i7 Core PC workstation for work plugged into nice keyboard, nice mouse and my 24" LCD monitor

    It'll happen. Just a question now of when
  • Paedric - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link

    Ivy Bridge really seems interesting, as it combines reduced power consumption with better integrated graphics.
    I think the CPU is already powerful enough for what it has to do, with only graphics lacking.
    It will also be the second generation of ultrabooks, so a lot of "newbie" errors should be fixed.

    I'm not sold on Win 8 and touch though.
    I think it's the role of tablet to be able to change to notebook, not the other way around, the Asus Transformer is the perfect example of this.
  • Nexing - Wednesday, December 28, 2011 - link

    Plenty of people wants to have a powerful, portable, battery lasting -at least for daily duties-, price competitive... sleek laptop.
    These ultrabooks do come close, except for the terrible omission of Intel's "Ivy bridge" 22nm CPU, which means that whatever CPU this ultrabook, (or any other released up to May 2012) comes with... will bear the almost obsolete 32nm "Sandy Bridge" CPU technology. Which means that this whole early ultrabook generation will not be battery efficient enough(4 hrs vs Ivy's 8-10 hrs of real usage, or will not run cool enough (not to be used at bed, on a coach, on your legs, etc).

    Very different story to the REALLY new ultrabook laptops to be released somewhen after 2012 Q2 that will come with Ivy Bridge CPUs...

    And to worse matters, those who actually buy one of these pre-Ivy Bridge Ubooks will never be able to upgrade into the coming 22nm tech, just because Intel said so (it is technically feasible and the norm for actually , confirmed to be upgradeable Sandy Bridge desktops)... So good luck with the niche & soon-to-be-obsolete 2011/Q1 2012 Ubooks,
    BUYERS BEWARE!!!
  • seapeople - Saturday, January 14, 2012 - link

    First of all, there is no Ivy Bridge, and if you want a computer within the next ~HALF YEAR then you'll have to buy one with poor old inefficient Sandy Bridge.

    Second of all, there's no way Ivy Bridge is going to increase battery life by 2.5x over Sandy Bridge. Just because it's a new architecture does not mean it will blow us away; Arrandale ULV laptops gave almost no benefit over Core 2 Duo ULV in terms of battery life, and actually decreased battery life in many cases (albeit with a fair performance increase, but not mind blowing).

    Third, if you think current Ultrabooks with Optimus and/or integrated graphics run too hot to be used on your lap, you are insane.
  • Pessimism - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link

    I'd suggest adding the MBA display data to your graphs since you heavily compare these systems to it and complain about the overall lack of display quality. Since Joe Public thinks Apple products can do no wrong and are made out of unicorn horns and fairy dust, lets see some hard data.
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link

    Added. Obviously we don't have the performance results for the MBA on most tests, but the LCD results are at least something we can easily compare.
  • Pessimism - Thursday, December 22, 2011 - link

    Thanks! Hopefully with enough direct numeric comparisons in reviews we can convince PC makers to stop using horrible, horrible panels.
  • Deelron - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link

    Occasionally Joe Public isn't wrong.
  • UrQuan3 - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link

    "but seriously: first IPS panel in a 13.3” laptop for under $1000 gets an Editor’s Choice award (as long as the rest of the laptop doesn’t completely suck)."

    That might be my favorite quote from this site. I hope some vendors are reading. I've been wanting and sRGB under 14" laptop for a decade. Settled for a Samsung 9 for now. Far from perfect, but it'll do for now.
  • jasondunn - Wednesday, December 21, 2011 - link

    I purchased a UX31 in October. I wanted it so badly I paid $68 to get next-day shipping because I was traveling and wanted it before I left. There are many things that are excellent about the UX31: I was impressed with the screen, the performance, the speed of sleep resume and boot, etc. But there's a *giant* problem with this laptop: the keyboard requires a heavy-handed style of typing. I type quite quickly, and apparently I type too "light" for the UX31.

    I've owned and used well over a dozen different laptops over the past decade, and the UX31 is the first where I found typing to be a disaster. I don't use that word lightly: I'd venture that 25% of all keystrokes were dropped. That means every single word I typed longer than a few characters would have errors it it. I contacted Asus support, they had me install a software update, and nothing changed. I went to a local Microsoft store and used the UX31 display model...it had exactly the same problem. If I slowed down and typed with more force, I got 100% accuracy. I don't believe I had a defective UX31 - I think this is simply the awful keyboard that Asus put in it.

    I should add that I found Asus' tech support to be quite lacking and would be very wary of dealing with them again.

    So my advice is this: make sure you're able to test the keyboard in person before putting down $1000+ to buy it. I regret my purchase and had to settle for a $1349 in-store credit rather than getting my money back.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now