Input Lag and Power Use

With the lag tests, the BenQ performed adequately, offering around 1 frame of lag overall in testing. Changing the refresh speed did nothing to alter these numbers either, so 15.3 ms of lag is about what you can expect from this display. I didn’t find it distracting or bothersome in the gaming I did, but if you want the lowest lag possible you’ll still need to look for a different panel type.

Processing Lag Comparison (By FPS)

The peak power use for the BenQ was pretty average for the size, with 36 watts used at full backlight power. At minimum backlight, that dropped down to 16 watts, which isn’t as low as many other displays are able to achieve at this point. Our database doesn’t have enough *VA panels to let me be certain if it’s the panel that requires more power or something in the design of the monitor, but the difference is only 4-5 watts over the best performing monitors. [Ed: Which, sadly, is probably why we're not seeing this sort of display in a laptop.]

LCD Power Draw (Kill-A-Watt)

Uniformity and Gamut Conclusion: Good with Caveats
Comments Locked

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • mike55 - Saturday, December 10, 2011 - link

    BenQ's website says this monitor has an 8-bit panel with 24-bit interpolation. I don't understand why interpolation is used for a panel that's capable of displaying 24-bit color. Could someone explain this, please?
  • marraco - Saturday, December 10, 2011 - link

    If I need a machine to tell the color accuracy of a monitor, well, then I don’t care much about it. I’m not sensible on color accuracy.

    But If I read an Anandtech article about a monitor, then I buy the monitor, and text looks blurry when I scroll web pages, PDF, and word documents, then I blame the Anandtech article which said NOT A WORD about things that matter.
  • snuuggles - Sunday, December 11, 2011 - link

    Man, I couldn't agree more. I'm not sure who these reviews are for. There are so few people that really care about color accuracy.

    - input lag
    - 120hz
    - ?? what else matters? I'm personally a little hazy on why any gamer would settle for 60hz when 120hz is just *so* much better.

    Now that I think about it, my guess is that the market for people who care about quality monitors (ie, people that know anything at all about displays) and who *aren't* photographers/graphic artists must be vanishingly small, which is why the reviews seem to cater to that crowd.
  • cheinonen - Sunday, December 11, 2011 - link

    There are people who care about color accuracy and those who care about input lag, and those who care about both. I can't venture to assume what percentage of people care about which unfortunately, though I care far more about color accuracy than input lag myself as I rarely game but do a lot of image and general work where the colors annoy me. However, I know I don't represent everyone so I try to cover everything I can.

    The next display up is a 120 Hz display, so there will be comments on that of course. I'm attempting to find a better way to measure the actual motion resolution on displays, but have run into a couple issues on that so far:
    - The test patterns max out at 1920x1080
    - The output is limited to 60 Hz
    So the 120 Hz display can't take full advantage of the panel for that. I'm trying to find a way to measure that better, as motion resolution is something that is hard to really get across right now.

    I'm trying to cover all the bases for reviews, and trying to clear out the backlog of monitors that are here so I can start to better select what the comments are interested in.
  • sulu1977 - Sunday, December 11, 2011 - link

    60 Hz monitors give me eyestrain every time. My next monitor absolutely has to be 120 Hz or higher.
  • Zan Lynx - Monday, December 12, 2011 - link

    Exactly how does the refresh rate on a LCD cause eye strain for you? I can see that with a CRT it would because the low phosphor persistence on high refresh rate CRTs would cause flicker when used at a lower refresh rate.

    With an LCD the pixel stays set until the displays gets a refresh. It doesn't flicker. At all.

    You might be seeing a 60Hz flicker of the LCD's fluorescent backlight tubes. If that is the problem, then you need to find a monitor manufacturer that uses a better backlight..

    It could also be caused by your eyes being badly affected by interference patterns generated by room fluorescent lighting flicker combining with LCD backlight flicker.

    In none of these cases will a 120Hz refresh LCD solve your problem except by a new display coincidentally using a different backlight.
  • sulu1977 - Tuesday, December 13, 2011 - link

    I thought my new LED LCD laptop would finally get rid of eyestrain forever, but I was very wrong. Just passing my fingers across the screen reveals obvious flicker. Without getting into deep technical analysis, the bottom line is this:I can stare at a tree in my yard and never get eye strain/fatigue, but staring at my new 60Hz LED LCD gives me eye strain/fatigue every time.
  • Oxford Guy - Tuesday, December 13, 2011 - link

    Next-generation panels from the maker of the panels used in these BenQ monitors are being produced and are about to be produced:

    http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/news_archive/25.htm#au...

    Some have a 5000:1 contrast ratio rating (up from 3000:1). Some are 120 Hz. They have a faster response rating of 6 ms g2g rather than 8 ms, and 12 ms overall rather than 25 ms.

    The first announced panel that appears to use one of these is the Phillips 241P4QPYEB/27 and 241P4QPYES/00. The only difference between the two is the color of the frame.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now