On Screen Display

Before we dive into the actual display performance numbers, it makes sense to talk about NEC's OSD and a little bit about the in-monitor calibration option that's offered. 

Tapping the menu button brings up the OSD, but also enables some on-screen button labels that change accordingly as you move around inside. Rotate into portrait, and obviously buttons change - so too do the on-screen labels, which is awesome.

There are actually two sets of OSDs on the PA301w. The first is what you get when you hit menu, and is a nice (yet still comprehensive) skinned menu with pretty straightforward navigation. Settings for brightness, black, and eco mode are on the first tab, position and scaling are on the second, then color, tools, menu options, more eco settings, and finally the info tab. The second is the Advanced OSD I'll show in a moment.

What's awesome about the settings is that everything has units where possible - brightness can be changed from 40 to 400 nits, black levels can also be artificially increased to match an adjacent display. As I'll show in a second, after you've run the in-monitor calibration, if you select a specific number, it'll actually drive the display relatively close to where it should be. What a breath of fresh air compared to completely arbitrary percentages. 

Aspect ratio scaling options include full, aspect-correct, off (1:1), and custom, which is controlled from the advanced OSD. Inside the "RGB" tab are some basic color settings such as white point and simple color controls. Tools has PIP control if you want to use it, the USB port per video input mapping controls, some selection criteria for choosing video inputs, and off timer plus signaling. Menu tools is just OSD settings like position, color, and language. 

Inside "ECO" is some interesting stuff. Based on the configured price per kilowatt-hour, you can see the total electrical cost of using the monitor. In addition, based on the configured kg (of carbon) per kilowatt-hour, you can see how much carbon you've released indirectly. One field is for how much would've been used if you didn't have eco settings turned on, the other is how much you actually used. Both essentially enable some dynamic brightness based on ambient lighting measured on the front sensor - mode 1 corresponds to 200 nits of range, mode 2 corresponds to 100 nits. 

What about that "advanced OSD?" Well, you can get to it two ways. Under the color tab, at the bottom, is a link named "Advanced Settings." Pressing select on that will bring you there, or you can get there by turning on the monitor by holding power and input at the same time. Doing so then makes the menu button consistently bring up the advanced OSD for the duration of the power-on session. 

Inside are essentially the same options as the basic OSD, with more depth in the color/picture section and a few other places. White point and color tristimulus values are given in x and y, there's gamma control, and a new uniformity pane. If you're serious about getting color right, these are seriously useful. Initially however, things aren't that close to reality. Even though the white point is set at 6500K, we can see that measured value out of box is around 5600K. The color tristimulus points are also similarly completely wrong. 

This is where the in-monitor calibration is super handy, as it internally calibrates the monitor so these settings actually reflect reality instead of remain shifted by however much the monitor has drifted or differs from ideal. Initially, I spent lots of time tweaking the display color points in HCFR, shifting appropriately based on how much the numbers differed from measured. While that actually did yield better results, running the built-in calibration routine got me 90% of the way there in 1 minute instead of 1 hour like I'm used to doing manually. 

Internal calibration mode only works with x-rite i1D2 colorimeters. NEC has a rebranded version they sell in a bundle, or you can buy your own. Chances are if you're willing to spend $2k+ on an LCD, you're also willing to spend the $200 to get an i1D2. Again, it plugs into the right-side USB port. To get into calibration mode, either find stand-alone calibration in tab B of the menu, or press the left and right keys at the same time from the no signal screen. The display will initialize the sensor, then tell you to wait 30 minutes for the CCFL to settle - welcome to how long calibrating CCFL backlit displays usually takes in-between adjustments. 

After that, you can select "self" for self calibration, or "copy" mode to actually match another PA301w or another display entirely. The display will prompt you to stick the colorimeter in the center, then run through its tests. The actual set of tests seems very basic - red, green, blue, then a whitepoint and brightness test. It takes almost exactly one minute to run, then tells you it's all done. 

The results are awesome. After running through, the white point is much closer to the actual reported value, and the primary color tristimulus values are much closer to what they should be. Note below how the brightness value and color temperature value are now much closer than they were pre-calibration. 

The even better part is that the presets also now correctly work for mapping to different color spaces. If you try to use them without calibration, you risk being offset depending on how the monitor has drifted. I still ended up tweaking all six of the x y values for red green and blue, but they were much, much closer than before. 

Introduction and Hardware Impressions Viewing Angles and Color Quality
Comments Locked

92 Comments

View All Comments

  • Seanrus - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    This is first time on andtech that I've read a review that I would consider clearly biased. I follow development of 30 inch monitors closely for a last couple of years, since I want one but not yet committed to it.

    My reasoning is that in final thought writer, at least, should have mentioned about the relative price point to other 30" monitors. If that was done it would be clear that this monitor does not fit well anywhere in the market of 30" monitors.

    Just bellow it, in performance, is HP ZR30 w which is can be acquired for $1100-1200 (for half the price) and performs very closely to this NEC.

    As result the only consumers that might consider this monitor for whom the price is not the option, but then there are monitors in 5K range that perform even better than this one.

    Also from the gamer perspective, which I speculate is the biggest audience here, ZR30w probably will be a better choice, because NEC, most likely, will not perform as well on response time as ZR30w since NEC has OSD (and that slows down response time as described in recent dell 30" monitor review.) This is a speculation and we need to wait for the results for response time to be posted.

    Finally, I got an impression from this article that being big and heavy is a good thing (unfortunately I do not think phrase form Snatch "If it does not work, you can hit with it" would apply here.) Even the title of the article emphasizes that. This big and heavy quality of the monitor is defensibly a drawback, especially when it is 20lb heavier than other 30" monitors.

    Conclusion that I came to from this article is that this monitor is nothing to be excited about, and is not a good buy for any consumer/prosumer segment. Performance benefits, and extra features that this NEC monitor has do not justify a $1000 premium.
  • strikeback03 - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    It is a product marketed at a professional audience, with a price and some features to match. Many people have been wondering how the "cheap" 30" displays compare to some of the options targeted at professionals, now they have a comparison. Yes, gamers are better off buying a cheaper one.
  • erple2 - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    I got the gist not that being big and heavy was a good thing, but that it wasn't a bad thing.
  • bossanova808 - Thursday, March 3, 2011 - link

    If the colour accuracy stuff in this review had been done properly, then you would have seen the NEC way out in front of the HP and, for the target market, that's pretty important. Not saying the HP doesn't make sense for gamers, but for the pro image makers that NEC are targetting, the PA30 is a spectacular device from a performance/price point of view when compared to it's real competition which is the CG303W from Eizo (and that's about it).
  • 8steve8 - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    no LED illumination = no buy
  • bossanova808 - Thursday, March 3, 2011 - link

    A disaster from a colour accuracy persepctive, hence no LED as it's not appropriat for the target market - same as EIzo don't do LED monitors.
  • Soldier1969 - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    with these days of half inch thick led panels this thing looks like something from 6 or 7 years ago. $2300 not thanks. Im just fine with my 30" HP ZR30w super ips panel you last reviewed. Works great and im still in awe of it with gaming and daily use. $1200 much better spent.
  • lemonadesoda - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    Yes, this is a nice 2560x1600 30"er.

    But where is the innovation? Where are the higher pixel density displays. Those that want 2560x1600 displays but in a more manageable 24" or 27" format?

    And what about ultra-hi resolution like 3840x2160 in 27"? Allowing you to read documents/PDFs in near-print DPI quality. Why is no-one making these?. the panels ARE available! http://www.chimei-innolux.com/opencms/cmo/products...
  • tzhu07 - Thursday, March 3, 2011 - link

    I currently own the NEC PA271W, the little brother to this monitor. I kind of prefer the 271 over the 301 because it has a finer dot pitch, therefore I don't have to move my head around as much. You do lose 160 horizontal lines, but it's really not too much of a big deal. It's the best monitor I've used so far.

    Those with poorer eye sight though should get the 301.
  • Beka - Thursday, March 3, 2011 - link

    Does this nec screen have a good scaler like the dell?
    Being able to play at lower resolution while having games that still look good is great feature of the dell.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now