HTPC enthusiasts are often concerned about the quality of pictures output by the system. While this is a very subjective metric, we have decided to take as much of an objective approach as possible. Starting with the Core 100 review, we have been using the HQV 2.0 benchmark for this purpose.

The HQV 2.0 test suite consists of 39 different streams divided into 4 different classes. The playback device is assigned scores for each, depending on how well it plays the stream. Each test was repeated multiple times to ensure that the correct score was assigned. The scoring details are available in the testing guide on the HQV website. In the table below, we indicate the maximum score possible for each test, and how much the Zino 410 was able to get.

 
Zino HD 410 : HQV 2.0 Benchmark
Test Class Chapter Tests Max. Score Zino HD 410
Video Conversion Video Resolution Dial 5 0
Dial with Static Pattern 5 0
Gray Bars 5 1
Violin 5 3
Film Resolution Stadium 2:2 5 5
Stadium 3:2 5 5
Overlay On Film Horizontal Text Scroll 5 3
Vertical Text Scroll 5 3
Cadence Response Time Transition to 3:2 Lock 5 5
Transition to 2:2 Lock 5 0
Multi-Cadence 2:2:2:4 24 FPS DVCam Video 5 5
2:3:3:2 24 FPS DVCam Video 5 5
3:2:3:2:2 24 FPS Vari-Speed 5 5
5:5 12 FPS Animation 5 5
6:4 12 FPS Animation 5 5
8:7 8 FPS Animation 5 5
Color Upsampling Errors Interlace Chroma Problem (ICP) 5 5
Chroma Upsampling Error (CUE) 5 5
Noise and Artifact Reduction Random Noise SailBoat 5 5
Flower 5 5
Sunrise 5 5
Harbour Night 5 5
Compression Artifacts Scrolling Text 5 3
Roller Coaster 5 3
Ferris Wheel 5 3
Bridge Traffic 5 3
Upscaled Compression Artifacts Text Pattern 5 3
Roller Coaster 5 3
Ferris Wheel 5 3
Bridge Traffic 5 3
Image Scaling and Enhancements Scaling and Filtering Luminance Frequency Bands 5 2
Chrominance Frequency Bands 5 2
Vanishing Text 5 5
Resolution Enhancement Brook, Mountain, Flower, Hair, Wood 15 15
Video Conversion Contrast Enhancement Theme Park 5 5
Driftwood 5 5
Beach at Dusk 5 5
White and Black Cats 5 5
Skin Tone Correction Skin Tones 10 7
         
    Total Score 210 160

To put this score in context, let us look at the HQV 2.0 scores obtained in some of our earlier tests.

HQV 2.0 Benchmark Scores

Amongst SFF HTPCs, the Zino 410 undoubtedly has the best HQV score. However, it is unable to approach the high scores obtained by the desktop 5570. Note that the Zino 410 is able to achieve this because none of the other GPUs have proper cadence detection (which forms a bulk of the score).

Unless the end usage scenario involves heavy viewing of streams needing cadence detection, it is hard to recommend the Zino 410's Mobility 5450 on the basis of the HQV scores.

Network Streaming Miscellaneous Concerns
Comments Locked

69 Comments

View All Comments

  • plewis00 - Saturday, February 19, 2011 - link

    I agree with you and was about to post this myself.

    If someone really wants a 2.5" hard disk why can't they use an adapter and remove the existing 3.5" unit. I bought a 2TB hard disk the other day for £60 (I'm in the UK), but that same amount of money would buy you a 500 or 640GB 2.5" model so I know what I'd rather have.

    I'd actually say rather than a complaint, Dell should actually be praised for fitting a 3.5" drive in there.
  • JNo - Saturday, February 19, 2011 - link

    Absolutely agree. I think you're analysis that 2.5" would be better is disappointing Ganesh. And I highly doubt that an SSD boot drive option would be beneficial to many people. This is an HTPC after all and affordability is key for what is a secondary PC.

    I have an Xtreamer (google it) and it cost only £99 and plays every hi def file(s) I've chucked at it including mkv, ts, blu-ray file structures and much more and supports hi def sound outputting as well. It is fanless too. In fact unless you want PVR functionality / internet too, it makes more expensive HTPCs redundant.

    Only disappointment is that it only fits a 2.5" drive and the largest (at the time) 500Gb drive I put in was as much as a 1.5TB drive eco/green drive. And the new 3.5" eco/green drives are just as quiet as their 2.5" brethren. I think most people savvy enough to know they need an HTPC tend to have very large music / video collections so size is a big deal.
  • ganeshts - Sunday, February 20, 2011 - link

    The Caviar Black 750 GB is specified to have a power consumption at full load of 8.4W [ http://www.wdc.com/en/library/sata/2879-701276.pdf ].

    The Scorpio Black 750 GB (2.5", 7200rpm) is specified to have a power consumption of 1.75W when active [ http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=13... ]

    My belief is that the extra ~7W could have been devoted to a better discrete GPU rather than having a 3.5" hard drive.

    Our well reviewed ASRock Vision 3D and Core 100 both have 2.5" hard drives, and I have hardly seen any reader / reviewers on other sites complain.

    Also, people savvy enough to think they need a HTPC also have an external storage solution (storage array or NAS), and the hard disk on the HTPC is just a temporary 'staging' ground.

    I still stand by my suggestion to Dell to move to a 2.5" hard drive for the next generation Zino.
  • Zoomer - Wednesday, March 2, 2011 - link

    I agree with taltamir on this. There is simply no reason to use 2.5" drives when there is space for 3.5". Some may buy this and use local storage. Even if they don't it's still cheaper to put a 3.5" in.

    Noise, most if not all HDDs can be set to reduce noise. Acoustic Managemet or something like that.

    The 2TB WD caviar green only requires 4.5 W when reading/writing. That's just 2.75 W, and barely worth considering.

    Maybe you can push dell to give people a choice. WD Green, Caviar black, or the 2.5" black. Why not the momentus XT?
  • JWade - Saturday, February 19, 2011 - link

    I got the 410 to upgrade from the 400hd, i like it alot better. i got the dual core one not the quad core. it does everything i need it to and then some.

    I cant hear it make any noise at all, even when playing games with it. I use it with my 42" tv.

    something of note, Dell did make an atom version of the Zino too.
  • ganeshts - Sunday, February 20, 2011 - link

    Yes, I remember the Atom Zino.. But it wasn't called the Zino HD. Thanfully they moved away from the anaemic Atom for their first Zino HD.

    The first Zino HD was the Zino 400 and this is the second generation.

    Glad to hear you like the Zino 410. It is a pretty good system for the price, and depending on your usage scenario you probably won't even notice the shortcomings!
  • Bignate603 - Saturday, February 19, 2011 - link

    I see a huge amount of HTPCs without the option for a TV tuner. For something that claims to be a HTPC it seems like a pretty blatant omission. It should at least be an upgrade you could order with it.
  • Taft12 - Saturday, February 19, 2011 - link

    http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82...
  • hvakrg - Sunday, February 20, 2011 - link

    Well, if you use a good HTPC program like Mediaportal you don't need tuner in all your HTPCs, all you need is a TVserver. That can then feed TV to all your HTPC clients around the house. It's a great way to do it because you won't have to pull coax to all your rooms.
  • myangeldust - Saturday, September 10, 2011 - link

    HDHomeRun dual tuners. Placed near your TV antenna or in your coaxial closet and connected to your home network. Any TV in the house could become an HTPC by simply installing the tuner's device driver. Fully compatible with Windows Media Center.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now