After the drawn out launch of GF100 and the GTX 400 series earlier this year, NVIDIA has been firing on all cylinders when it comes to the launch of the rest of the Fermi family. In July we saw the launch of the GF104 GPU and the GTX 460 it powers, providing a surprising tweak to the Fermi architecture on what should have been a simple waterfall part, and in the process trampling AMD’s Radeon HD 5830 at the $200 price point. For the first time in over a year we saw an NVIDIA product come out that was hyper-competitive on performance and pricing, the kind of competition we sorely miss.

Now 2 months after that launch we’re going to find out if lightning strikes twice. Today NVIDIA is launching the next desktop video card in the 400 series: GTS 450 Powering it is their new Fermi family GPU – GF106 – the next in the line of successively smaller Fermi GPUs for cheaper products. Targeted directly against AMD’s Radeon HD 5700 series, does it have what it takes to dethrone AMD's mainstream lineup?

  GTX 480 GTX 460 768MB GTX 285 GTS 450 GTS 250
Stream Processors 480 336 240 192 128
Texture Address / Filtering 60/60 56/56 80 / 80 32/32 64/64
ROPs 48 24 32 16 16
Core Clock 700MHz 675MHz 648MHz 783MHz 738MHz
Shader Clock 1401MHz 1350MHz 1476MHz 1566MHz 1836MHz
Memory Clock 924MHz (3696MHz data rate) GDDR5 900MHz (3.6GHz data rate) GDDR5 1242MHz (2484MHz data rate) GDDR3 902MHz (3.608GHz data rate) GDDR5 1100MHz (2.2GHz data rate) GDDR3
Memory Bus Width 384-bit 192-bit 512-bit 128-bit 256-bit
Frame Buffer 1.5GB 768MB 1GB 1GB 1GB
FP64 1/8 FP32 1/12 FP32 1/12 FP32 1/12 FP32 N/A
Transistor Count 3B 1.95B 1.4B 1.17B 754M
Manufacturing Process TSMC 40nm TSMC 40nm TSMC 55nm TSMC 40nm TSMC 55nm
Price Point $499 $169 N/A $129 $99

At the heart of the GTS 450 is the GF106 GPU, which is probably not one of NVIDIA’s best-kept secrets. Traditionally GPUs launch in desktop products first before getting the mobile treatment, but in the case of the 400 series it’s a bit of the inverse. GF100 and GF104 launched in desktop products first, but GF106 and GF108 were launched in a somewhat quiet manner earlier this month when NVIDIA unveiled their mobile 400 series lineup. So GF106 itself is not being unveiled today, but we do have more concrete details about it that weren’t available for the mobile launch.

If you recall GF104, it set itself up nicely to be cut-down for GF106. With 384 CUDA cores spread over 2 GPCs and 4 sets of ROPs & memory controllers, half of a GF104 and what presumably would be a GF106 was easy to see. Instead what we’re getting is a bit of a curveball, as GF106 is a bit more than half of a GF104.

GF106 Block Diagram

Fundamentally it’s GF104-derrived, sporting the 48 CUDA cores per SM design that GF104 pioneered. But while NVIDIA did end up removing 1 of the 2 GPCs (and by extension, half the CUDA cores), they didn’t halve the ROPs and memory controllers while they were at it. As a result GF106 is a bit more than we bargained for, entering the world as a 192 CUDA core part but with 3 sets of memory controllers and ROPs, for a combined total of a 192bit memory bus, 384KB of L2 cache, and 24 ROPs. Internally this is organized as a 1 GPC part containing 4 SMs, resulting in GF106 having 1 Raster Engine and 4 Polymorph engines; meanwhile the contents of each SM remains unchanged from GF104, so for each SM there are 48 CUDA cores and 4 texture units (for a total of 16 texture units in GF106) along with its Polymorph Engine.

But like GF104, GF106 won’t immediately be seen in its full form. NVIDIA is launching their desktop GF106 cards with 1 of the 3 sets of memory controller/ROP pairs disabled. As a result GTS 450 as we know it today is going to be a 192 CUDA core part, but using a 128bit memory bus with 256KB of L2 cache and 16 ROPs. For the time being the only product that’s been announced that will use a full GF106 GPU is the GeForce GT 460M, which will be available in a 192bit configuration with all 192 CUDA cores enabled.

GTS 450 Block Diagram

At 1.17 billion transistors GF106 is not particularly big; NVIDIA won’t give us the die size, but a really rough estimate on our part is 240mm2(15mm x 16mm). With that in mind, we hear that 40nm yields at TSMC are caught up with 55nm yields, so we’re not entirely sure why NVIDIA is launching only harvested parts today. At first glance it seems like they could launch a 2nd, fully-equipped card for a higher price and profit margin, but admittedly we don’t have all the facts. The biggest question of course is whether enabling the extra memory controller and ROPs provides a material benefit – if GF106 is shader limited at these clockspeeds, then perhaps it isn’t worth it. Hopefully one day we’ll find out if this is the case.

In any case, the star of the show today is GTS 450, the newest member of the GeForce family and intended for gaming at resolutions around 1680x1050. It’s clocked at 783MHz for the core, 1566MHz for the shaders, and 902MHz (3.6GHz effective) for its GDDR5 RAM. Currently it’s only being offered in a 1GB configuration; however we wouldn’t be shocked to see a 512MB part further down the line at even more budget-oriented prices. NVIDIA is launching the card at $129 and will be using it to replace the GTS 250, the last and most powerful card based on NVIDIA’s long-lived workhorse, G92. This makes GF106 the de-facto successor to G92, a very tough act to follow.


NVIDIA puts the TDP for a reference GTS 450 at 106W, though as NVIDIA likes to note this is a “real world” number and FurMark can exceed this. NVIDIA does not provide an idle TDP for GTS 450, however as you’ll see in our tests it’s clearly quite low. Like the GTX 460, NVIDIA is heavily pushing the overclockability of GTS 450, and as a result a large number of factory-overclocked cards will be launching alongside reference-clocked cards. This pushes the TDP further out but it improves performance a great deal – the fastest of the vendor cards we’re looking at today is 930MHz, a 19% factory overclock. These cards will of course command a higher price, although we hear some of the lesser overclocked cards may hit the same $129 price as the reference-clocked cards.

Finally, NVIDIA is once again repricing the 400 series lineup with this launch. The MSRP of the GTX 470 and GTX 465 are down to $300 and $230 respectively. Meanwhile GTX 460 is also getting a price drop – the 1GB version drops by $10 to $220 while the 768MB version takes a much bigger price drop of $30 to $170. At $200 the 768MB GTX 460 was already a good deal, but as we noted in our on review for $30 more it made much more sense to grab the 1GB card with its wider memory bus and additional ROPs. As a consequence NVIDIA has driven a larger price gap between the two cards so that the 768MB version isn’t passed up in favor of the 1GB version as often.

Finally we have the GTS 450, which is launching at $130. NVIDIA was clearly going for a price between the Radeon HD 5770 and 5750, however AMD apparently expected this and has worked with partners to nudge prices down – the cheapest 5770s can be found for $130 after rebate. If these prices hold then the GTS 450 is basically in lock-step with the 5770, but we’re only seeing a few 5770s at this price so it may prove to be a temporary launch day counter-attack. In any case AMD is definitely under some pricing pressure thanks to the GTX 460 price drop – the GTX 460 is significantly faster than the 5770, so they can’t realistically charge more than $150 for it and leaving them few options besides bringing prices down and putting pressure on the GTS 450.

September 2010 Video Card MSRPs
  $700 Radeon HD 5970
$360 Radeon HD 5870
$270 Radeon HD 5850
$170 Radeon HD 5830
$130 Radeon HD 5770
Meet the GTS 450
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • just4U - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link

    Here in Canada I haven't really seen any 5850's priced under 300 yet and most are up in the 330 range.. The 1G 460 sit's in the 220-240 (no price drops for us) so it's a tempting alternative for many (I think)

    I also believe the 5850 will be a $200 card sometime in the near future. It's been selling way above it's suggested retail price (at launch) and when that happens it will be harder to consider the 460 as a viable alternative. I can't see it being sold at $150 (for the 1G variants) any time soon... so only fan's of Nvidia would consider it if it's priced in the 5850s range.
  • jabber - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link

    Big thing is...who actually bought a 5830?

    When it came out everyone said it was a pointless card so big whoop, Nvidia's 460 beats a card that should never have been released in the first place.

    Bit like saying "our car out performed the Ford Edsel!"

    If you want middle of the road performance you get a 5770, if you want a better boost you get the 5850.
  • just4U - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link

    It was only a pointless card because of it's price... Originally it should have been alot cheaper but supply and demand has inflated the prices of most of Amd's 5X lineup. Sitting near a $100 more then the 5770 is what made it a hard sell.
  • erple2 - Wednesday, September 15, 2010 - link

    Sure it did - the 768MB version fo the 460 now gave you 5830 performance for > 10% less money. To me, that makes it sound like the 5830 was now "obsoleted" by the 460 series. The 1 GB card was significantly faster at the same price point, and the 768 MB version was just as fast, but significantly cheaper. Both using less power, noise and heat.

    Isn't that essentially what defines "obsoletes"?
  • SandmanWN - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link

    Throughout the entire test suite the 5850 is within 4-6 frames of the 470. In two it makes it to 8 and 10 frames more. Given you need an extra 100W's on your power supply and the additional cost associated with that just to get that tiny fraction of output, the statement seems fanboyish. AT should be better than this.
  • just4U - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link

    What does the 470 have to do with this? Most of us all agree that the 465/470/480 are all heat scores with insane power draws.. the 460 addressed that and came in at a price point that hit a sweet spot.. bringing alot of the 470/480's strengths and none of it's weaknesses to the table. Only real complaint I've seen for the 460 is the mini hdmi.
  • IceDread - Tuesday, September 14, 2010 - link

    You are missing my point.

    By saying "and it struck beautifully" implies that you are cheering for the nvidia team. It would be a different thing if he wrote "and it struck hard" or something like that.
  • adonn78 - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link

    I read another review, damn my cheating heart. That stated the SLI scalling ont hese cards were impressive. You got 2 GTS 450 cards but no SLI?
  • Stuka87 - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link

    Er, every single benchmark shows the GTS-450 SLI scores. They are marked in green (like the regular GTS-450).
  • marraco - Monday, September 13, 2010 - link

    Other web sites show that the 450 is slower than the 250.

    It's strange when the 250 has 128 shaders, and the 450 has 192.... and the 450 has DDR5 vs DDR3 in the 250.

    It looks like the texture units bottleneck this design.

    Even more strange is that I could not find the 250 on this article charts.

    I don't see the 450 as price competitive with the radeons, except as SLI setup. It would be more valuable if 3-SLI way were allowed, and I guess that is not the case, because the photos shown only a single SLI connector.

    The SLI setups are unbeatable against the radeons price/performance. Maybe nVidia should design cheap, energy-efficient chips so a card manufacturer can pack 10 video chips on a single card.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now