The Rampage III’s component layout is nigh-on identical to the P55 based Maximus III (Marvell SATA 6G and NEC USB 3), the only real change coming in the form of the Realtek’s ALC889 audio codec instead of a VIA solution.  Unlike previous ROG boards, ASUS are not providing the Realtek’s codec as a plug-in soundcard, instead it’s back to on-board placement. This would have been okay with us provided ASUS bundled some form of Creative gaming software or Dolby package, but there’s nothing of the sort on offer here, which will leave most users looking at plug-in alternatives.

A single Intel 82578DC NIC is utilized for LAN duties, which many users fancy as a better alternative to controllers from Realtek, Broadcom and Marvell.  You’ll want to avoid the latest Intel drivers (ASUS are using an older version which works OK), as they seem to have a bug with wake from S3 so stick with what you get on the driver disk or ASUS download site until newer drivers are qualified.


What’s in the box?

The following items are shipped with the Rampage III Extreme:

1 x ROG Connect Cable

1 x ProbeIt Cable Set

1 x 3-Way SLI Bridge

1 x SLI Cable

1 x  CrossFire cable

6 x SATA Cables

2 x SATA 6G Cables

1 x two Port USB 2.0 and eSATA bracket

1 x I/O Shield

1 x Thermal Sensor Pack (for fan header thermal monitoring/speed control)

1 x Cable ties pack

1 x ROG sticker and 1 x Cable label pack

1 x Optional Heatsink and fan (for IOH cooling)

1 x RC Bluetooth module

1 x Support DVD

1 x User Manual

A fairly comprehensive bundle from ASUS as you’d expect at the price. The thermal sensors are a nice touch and tie in very nicely with ASUS’s fan control options – easily the most comprehensive range of control on offer from any vendor, putting more expensive boards from EVGA and Gigabyte to shame.


Board Layout

We quite like the layout of the R3E, everything is accessible in most situations: 

On-board cooling isn’t that great in our opinion – IOH idle temps with ASUS’s heatsink and fan combo are up in the 60s at stock voltages (high for a board without NF200s). Overclock higher and you will hit 70 Celsius plus quite easily in a case. Ordinarily we are not overly concerned about temps although in this instance high temperatures on the IOH can be a hindrance because the QPI bus starts to throttle when temps go too high. This also limits the board’s stability at high BCLK unless you provide copious amounts of additional airflow across the heatsink assembly. The whole situation is not helped by ASUS’s choice of thermal interface material; it’s thick yellow bubble gum type stuff. A simple change out of TIM on the IOH to Artic Silver Ceramique lowered the IOH idle/load temps by seven Celsius and encouraged the board to POST past 215 BCLK. We’ve passed our findings on to ASUS and hope they update future boards from the factory.

One thing we should mention before we move on; ASUS provide socket 775 mounting holes for older CPU coolers, which some users may appreciate.


Slot layout is geared for multi-GPU setups, allowing the use of three dual slot graphics cards in tandem with a PCIe sound card or four dual slot GPUs (CrossFireX). Lane allocation is 16x/16x, 16x,8x,8x or 8x/8x/8x/8x.


On-board power and reset buttons are available near the DIMM slots, together with voltage read points and also on/off switches for the PEG slots which can be useful when using multi-card setups during benchmarking.



The software side of ASUS’s bundle is the same as what we covered on the Maximus III Extreme here. You’ll be pleased to know we didn’t find bugs, the overclocking software works fine.


BIOS & User Experience


Aside from aesthetic appeal, BIOS is probably the best reason to choose the R3E over the other boards we’ve got on test today. It’s easy to navigate and contains options for every type of user.

click to enlarge

Memory overclocking is made easy thanks to automated scaling routines that apply offsets as memory frequency is increased. Individual timings can be changed one at a time, away from the BIOS presets, while the BIOS displays the actual setting in a list for cross reference.

Out of all the boards we’ve got on test today the R3E provided us with the best overall user experience. The only “bugs” we found in the 0602 BIOS related to a couple of sub-timings failing to respond to manual changes. This has since been fixed, and right now there’s nothing we can think of to complain about.  

The 9124 beta BIOS is earmarked as ASUS’s benchmarking centric BIOS, it adds all the fixes to date together with what ASUS call “2D Performance Booster” for Gulftown processors. ASUS love giving simple things proprietary names, all this setting really does is disable Gulftown specific microcode which gives a boost to some 2D benchmarks (circa 4~6 seconds in Super Pi 32M). This feature is not unique to ASUS; EVGA have a Turbo option in their BIOS that does the same thing, while Gigabyte have a beta BIOS in circulation that does something similar (without the option to swtich the microcode on and off).  Overall, it’s a nice feature for those chasing 2D records, but is of no use to anyone running these boards in a 24/7 system.


The dual BIOS system we first saw employed on the M3E gets an outing on the R3E, too. Two separate BIOS chips are used by ASUS each can be flashed to a different BIOS version for cross compare and backup. Switching between BIOSes can be done via BIOS, ROG Connect or by using an onboard switch when the board is in standby mode.

BIOS flashing can also be taken care of a variety of ways; flashing is possible via OS software, via a built in routine accessed through BIOS or ROG connect while the board is in standby state - covering just about every usage scenario.

There are no hardware incompatibility issues we have to report, everything in our test repertoire was recognized and available for use with minimal setup fuss.  S3 resume worked well, we managed to wake the board at 210BCLK from USB after several hours, which we consider excellent, though not class leading. Recovery from failed overclocks works farily well in most instances, at most we needed to cycle power to encourage a safe mode POST. Not the very best rendition of automated recovery we’ve seen, however it is something we can live with.

General board stability under stress and benchmarking conditions is also good, the R3E consistently scored at or near the top in our tests and managed some of the highest stable frequencies we’ve seen on our Gulftown processors. The only exception being the need to switch over to QPI slow mode on our test sample boards once past 219 BCLK – something we don’t have to do on the EVGA and Gigabyte test samples (although those boards cost more). Where this may become an issue for some users is when pushing locked core multiplier processors at high BCLK for benchmarking purposes; you need a board with a good IOH to do it.  That’s the only black mark we have against our R3E samples thus far; we were expecting the second generation of X58 boards to be more consistent in the BCLK department. That being said, out of the four boards we’re testing today, the R3E is the best all round performer and the easiest to use.

Boards & Prices EVGA X58 Four Way Classified (E762)
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Etern205 - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    People who get this all they cared about is the amount of nonsense that's place on these board and the size of their e-penis without any thought as to whether spending this much will bring the same in return.
  • SniperWulf - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    It's official, Gigabyte is officially off their rocker!

    Now I get that they don't expect to sell these to everyone, but still for what you get, it's totally not worth it. I bet this board still has crappy fan controls too...
  • MGSsancho - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    Could you tell up what ACPI version these mobos use? I was able to find out the Gigabyte X58A-UD9 uses ACPI 1.0b but c'mon people version 4 is out. I have gone to every common mobo website and there is no board that supports anything higher than 2. Supermicro does sell version 3.0 and 4.0 on their latest offerings. ACPI is important to those of use who run other Operating systems and want to be able to use all those fancy power saving features with out drivers.

    Having many PCIE lanes is awesome for those of us into making file servers. But I suppose I am just better off with a server mobo, ECC ram and its better features
  • xetura - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    These I7 setups are great and all, but they're still way too expensive. My q6600@3.6ghz still does just fine. I can't justify spending $650 for a mobo, cpu and ram setup that doesn't perform that much better than my setup. Sure, if I had SLI or XFIRE it will be a big jump, but I don't have either.
  • Finally - Saturday, July 17, 2010 - link

    ...when was the last time, AT reviewed an AMD chipset board?
    4 (!) months ago. Just click on the big "motherboard" button above.
    Check out the ratio Intel:AMD...

    Funnily enough the last AMD board had its price right in the title: $140!

    ...seriously, guys. If you have to admit to yourselves, that you are running out of Intel board to review, MAYBE test something I'm actually interested in.
  • tercathian - Sunday, July 18, 2010 - link

    Yeah, 19 of 20 reviews on Intel, some as multiple boards (just on the first/latest directory page). 1 AMD board review????
    Balance, AT, Balance!
    What are the good, the bad, the great, and the ugly of AMD boards out there currently?
  • ggathagan - Sunday, July 18, 2010 - link

    What was your translation of the first paragraph of the article?

    You know, where Raja stated:
    "Thus far, we’ve spent most of 2010 focusing on mainstream segments for our motherboards reviews, there’s more of that to come over the next few months starting off with a long overdue focus on AMD"
  • MaxMax - Saturday, July 17, 2010 - link

    WTF !!

    $700 for a motherboard ?!

    What so special about it even $200 - $250 motherboards bypass it !!

    It is not even fit in my Coolermaster HAF 932 case !!

    They got mad !!
  • MacGyverSG1 - Monday, July 19, 2010 - link

    I have read a few reviews and I think the memory problem might only affect the early production boards. I noticed in your pictures, and you stated, that the SATA 6GB/s ports are facing up. Other reviews have pictures that show the SATA 6GB/s ports at a 90 degree angle like the rest. I also was able to see that that board was v1.1. Maybe you have a v1.0 board that had problems that were fixed with v1.1?
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, July 19, 2010 - link


    The rev 1.0 change is an input inductor change (to support the OCP increase), a default OCP for VCC increase to 360 amps. plus a small change for PSU startup. These modifications were performed by MSI (by hand) to our second board before they shipped it out to us. Further, there are retail consumers with rev 1.1 boards reporting memory issues like ours.

    Hope this helps.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now