Apple's iPhone 4: Thoroughly Reviewed

270 Comments

View All Comments

• noiserr - Friday, July 2, 2010 - link

  I am getting really tired of people who have no clue what OS X actually is.
  
  Android is much more similar to OS X than Windows. OS X is based on an Open Source kernel for starters and both Android and OS X are *nixes, OS X also uses open standards (OpenGL vs. DirectX for instance).
  
  OS X is in many ways much more configurable and open than Windows, compare how many file systems Windows supports vs. those OS X does.
  
  Apple is foremost a hardware company. They strive to create tightly integrated devices which come at the price of less configurability but they are renowned for their intuitive UI and ease of use. You may disagree with it but you can't argue against the fact that It's a business model that has served Apple well.
  
  Personally I am a geek. I also write code for a living, while I do indeed like Android a lot when it comes to my phone I just don't care nor do I have time to tinker with it.

• Mr Alpha - Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - link

  "If there's one thing I hope the iPhone 4 display does, it's generate demand for 300 PPI level desktop displays - the era of 110 PPI displays being the norm needs to end now."
  
  Hear, hear!

• Griswold - Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - link

  I dont want ppi inflated desktop screens. Ive tried to work with them and they are an utter failure for me.

• Zan Lynx - Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - link

  I used to use a 150 DPI laptop screen. It was excellent.
  
  Blame your lousy desktop software, not the beautiful screens.

• fabarati - Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - link

  Haven't read through all of it yet, but the contrast part on the first page seems to be in the wrong place, or we're missing a whole section there. I'll add more stuff as I find them.

• fabarati - Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - link

  ok, on the first display page, you write "They're both entirely conventions." It may just be my non-native english speaking that's shining through, but that seems to be lacking a few words.
  
  And It's hard to know who's writing what. In one section, Brian's the third party, in another, it's anand. Especially when you're comparing things, it makes it a little hard to follow.

• fabarati - Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - link

  Some minor niggles, like videocalls already existing in other regions over 3G (and being hugely impopular), and not being sure about it being the best camera (comparisons to other phones than those listed are needed, like some nokia, sony ericsson and samsung phones), but otherwise a very thorough and fair review.
  
  Good job!

• Jittos - Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - link

  I've been sensing Anandtech's bias towards Apple's product for quite sometimes. Especially in cases where there are direct comparisons between iPhone and Android. However, I've always enjoyed the scientific/ fact-based method of tests Anandtech uses.
  
  Now please correct me if I misunderstood the article, but from what I'm reading in the signal strength comparison, it's iPhone 4 IN A CASE vs iPhone 3GS vs Nexus One? Why only test iPhone 4 in a case? Why not also show the results of iPhone without the case? I'm asking this so that we can all see how the iPhone 4 performs under various scenarios. Many iPhone users prefer to not put their beautiful device in a rubber case.
  
  IF Anandtech indeed intentionally omit the test results for iPhone without case just so that iPhone 4 can have good looking results, then I lose all respect I have for Anandtech as a professionally run tech site. (so please correct me that I'm wrong)

• Jittos - Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - link

  OK, I re-read the article and I was wrong. sorry.
  
  Anadtech is still the best :)

• piroroadkill - Wednesday, June 30, 2010 - link

  Yeah, don't be so hasty.
  
  This is easily the best, and most technical article I've seen on the antenna problem yet.
  
  It confirms it, and describes why people have varying experiences (the really, really non-linear bars.. my guess is those cutoff points WILL be changed in the next iOS build to mask the problem) and compares it reasonably to other devices, which do show the problem, but much, much less.
  
  I'd love to say this would silence everyone, but I know there will still be irrational people, who, in the face of decent research, will still argue their point with no basis at all.
  
  Thank you Anand. You do come across as gushing over Apple products recently.. but even so, this was a decent article.