Performance and Benchmarks

Ah yes, we have again reached the most exciting part of all netbook reviews—the benchmarks! Some really interesting stuff is going to go down here, so pay attention.

Futuremark PCMark Vantage

Futuremark PCMark05

Internet Performance

Futuremark 3DMark03

Futuremark 3DMark05

Futuremark 3DMark06

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R10

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R10

Video Encoding - x264

Video Encoding - x264

In all seriousness, these are just Atom-based netbooks, and have the exact same specs as the last couple of netbooks we've tested. Naturally, performance is similar to those two, which is to say fairly mediocre but as expected for the netbook class. As before, you can forget about any 3D intensive gaming and HD video playback won't be the smoothest experience in the world (but not all that important without an HD screen or an HDMI out). For more information, you can check out the previous netbook reviews or the Pine Trail review.

Screen Analysis Battery Life
Comments Locked

15 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - link

    I've got a couple AMD-based laptop reviews in the works. Vivek will be getting the Acer Ferrari One this week (CULV alternative), and I've got M300 and M600 laptops to compare with an i3-430m setup. Honestly, other than a lower price AMD laptops are still a tough sell in my book. The better IGP still isn't that great; the Intel HD i3/i5 IGP is good enough for anything but gaming, while the HD 4200 needs low detail and 800x600 resolution to be playable in most titles. Couple that with generally lower performance and battery life and there's not a lot of benefit.

    CULV with a discrete GPU can give you better battery life and gaming performance if that's what you're after, though it will cost (a lot) more. At that point, the CULV + Optimus laptops end up being the best recommendation. So the choice is pretty much 8 hours battery life with 4500MHD (Intel CULV) or 4 hours battery life with HD 4200 (AMD), for around $400-$600.
  • jaydee - Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - link

    But I think the ASUS Eee PC 1201T w/AMD mv-40 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8... could give the traditional Atom-based netbook a good run for it's money.

    About $60 more and you get 12" screen, 1366x768 resolution, 2GB of RAM, HDMI out, stronger CPU and much stronger integrated graphics. You lose on battery life, and doesn't come with an OS, but for people with extra WinXP licenses or wanting to put Linux on it, I think it provides a much stronger value than the above Acer/Gateway twins, don't you think?

    How would it compare to Atom+Ion? It'll still be cheaper, but should even out the battery life.
  • hybrid2d4x4 - Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - link

    Hey, I just wanted to throw out a suggestion for the firefox sqlite issue: install a RAMdrive app (I use Dataram RAMDisk - it's free and works flawlessly, even with win7 x64) and move your profile to the RAM drive. I did this on my HTPC as this is something that has been nagging me with a WD Green drive where the drive would noticeably lag when the head is unloaded and I start typing into the address bar. The time to generate "suggestions" as you type is now instantaneous! You can configure it to load the image on startup and save it on shutdown, so it works exactly like normal, but the only time it accesses the HDD is on startup/shutdown. It also saves you the wear of the very frequent unnecessary random writes to the HDD every time you load a page or reads when it fills in what you type.

    Having said that, I would also like to see how SSDs would fare in laptops, and in addition to your suggestions, I hope that Anand would also throw a typical 2.5" HDD into the SSD power charts as a reference for those of us considering SSD swaps into laptops.
  • m4nm4n - Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - link

    If I had these connected to my Wifi router, the router would be named Gleek.
  • popej - Thursday, June 24, 2010 - link

    You wrote: "we don't know if the ASUS laptops are truly more energy efficient".
    You probably use ASUS Super Hybrid Engine in auto mode. When running on battery SHE cripple notebook performance. CPU and RAM frequency is reduced by 20% and battery life is longer.

    I think it is a flaw in your test, that you don't check performance when on battery.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now