Intel’s Response: The Pentium E6300

AMD has two new dual-core chips priced at $87 and $102, both run at or around 3.0GHz and have a fair amount of cache.  The Athlon II X2 250 has a 1MB L2 per core (2MB total) while the Phenom II X2 550 BE has a large 6MB L3 to share between its two cores.  These are both very healthy sounding processors, borderline scary if you’re Intel.


The Pentium E6300

In the blue corner we have the new Pentium E6300.  It’s a 45nm monolithic dual-core part, just like the Athlon II X2.  It has a 2MB L2 cache also like the Athlon II X2, albeit shared between the two cores which is potentially an upside.  Unlike previous Pentium for Desktop (that’s the official name) processors, the E6300 uses a 1066MHz FSB and it supports Intel’s VT.  The problem?  The E6300 only runs at 2.80GHz; AMD has a clock speed advantage.

In our first Phenom II review I talked about how AMD needs a clock speed advantage to compete.  Compared to a large-cache Core 2, that’s very true, but the E6300 doesn’t have a healthy 6MB L2 for two cores.  It’s only got 2MB.  All of the sudden things aren’t looking so rosy for Intel.

An inherent advantage of Intel’s Core architecture is its 4-issue front end (which in some cases can behave like a 5-issue front end).  The problem is feeding such a beast requires very fast memory access.  The Pentium E6300 is still based on the same architecture as the Core 2 Duo, meaning it has no on-die memory controller.  Rob it of a decent sized cache and its performance suffers.  A quick look at Bench shows us that even an extra megabyte of cache helps tremendously:

Processor SYSMark 2007 Overall
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 (2.93GHz/3MB L2) 173
Intel Pentium E6300 (2.80GHz/2MB L2) 158

 

Note that when Conroe first launched some parts (the Core 2 Duo E6300 funny enough) only had a 2MB L2.  The problem is that was nearly three years ago; applications have grown in size and so have their demands from processors.  What was acceptable back then is now not.  I’d like to see Intel move its 3MB L2 caches down to these sub-$100 price points.  But I’ll let the benchmarks decide whether or not it’s necessary.

Processor Clock Speed L2 Cache TDP Price
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 3.00GHz 12MB 95W $316
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz 12MB 95W $266
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 2.66GHz 6MB 95W $213
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 2.50GHz 6MB 95W $213
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 2.66GHz 4MB 95W $183
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 2.50GHz 4MB 95W $183
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 2.33GHz 4MB 95W $163
Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 3.33GHz 6MB 65W $266
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16GHz 6MB 65W $183
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.00GHz 6MB 65W $163
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93GHz 3MB 65W $133
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 2.80GHz 3MB 65W $113
Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 2.66GHz 3MB 65W $113
Intel Pentium E6300 2.80GHz 2MB 65W $84
Intel Pentium E5400 2.70GHz 2MB 65W $84
Intel Pentium E5300 2.60GHz 2MB 65W $74
Intel Pentium E5200 2.50GHz 2MB 65W $64
Intel Pentium E2220 2.40GHz 1MB 65W $64
Intel Pentium E2200 2.20GHz 1MB 65W $64
Intel Celeron E1500 2.20GHz 512KB 65W $53
Intel Celeron E1400 2.00GHz 512KB 65W $43
Intel Celeron 450 2.20GHz 512KB 35W $53
Intel Celeron 440 2.00GHz 512KB 35W $44
Intel Celeron 430 1.80GHz 512KB 35W $34
Intel's Current Lineup
Athlon II X2: Hardware C1E and Return of the CnQ Bug A Blast from the Past: The Pentium 4 660 and the Pentium Extreme Edition 955
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • adiposity - Friday, June 5, 2009 - link

    10 minutes is wrong, it's more like an hour for sub-src. My mistake.
  • adiposity - Wednesday, June 3, 2009 - link

    Oh, and

    configure -release

    Will build only release target, speeds things up as well.
  • adiposity - Wednesday, June 3, 2009 - link

    make that

    configure -release -no-webkit
  • ssj4Gogeta - Tuesday, June 2, 2009 - link

    Anand, the x264 first pass encoding graph is "higher is better" but the processors are arranged with the shortest bar (slowest processor) on the top. Please fix that.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, June 2, 2009 - link

    Noted and fixed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now