Crysis Warhead Performance

Again NVIDIA leads, though our settings were a little aggressive for these parts which are just under playable at 1680x1050. 1280x1024 would have been a good target resolution for this game with these settings, or dropping the enthusiast shaders might also have helped out. But whatever way you slice it, the GTS 250 leads in both single and dual configurations (the latter actually remain playable through 1920x1200 as well).




1680x1050    1920x1200    2560x1600


Fallout 3 Performance

This one is pretty interesting even though our multiGPU options are system/LOD limited by the game at 1680x1050 and 1920x1200. It's clear that memory really helps in this test when resolution increases, as the 1GB GTS 250 improves on the 512MB by about 50%. At lower resolutions, the GTS 250 1GB just comes in ahead of the 512MB 4850 which just comes in ahead of the 512MB GTS 250. It looks like at 1680x1050 and lower the memory stops making a difference and all three of these cards just tie.




1680x1050    1920x1200    2560x1600
Age of Conan & Call of Duty World at War Performance FarCry 2, Left 4 Dead & Race Driver GRID Performance
Comments Locked

103 Comments

View All Comments

  • SiliconDoc - Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - link

    Great post.
    "Thanks".
    Don't forget to ask why the red roosters keep begging for nvidia to downgrade their gt200 core... they hope and pray nvidia acts that stupid, so that the sloppy g80/g92/g92b equivalent ati top best core they can make R770 core (4830) LOOKS BETTER and the "cover up" about the GT200 core STOMPING AWAY WITHOUT DDR5 is never known, never widely realized.
    Yes, very insightful.
    "Thank you."
  • chrish89 - Tuesday, March 3, 2009 - link

    "power consumption is slower"
  • ickibar1234 - Sunday, June 2, 2013 - link

    YAY! This card, according to the mininum system requirements, will play "Metro: Last night"! Sweet.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now