The 84th Annual PMA kicked off in Las Vegas on Thursday. PMA bills itself as “The Worldwide Community of Imaging Associations”, and if it has to do with imaging you will find it on display at PMA. The event is usually a late February or early March event, but this years scheduling placed it just a few weeks after CES. The other major photo event, Photokina in Hanover, Germany, happens every two years. 2008 is a Photokina year, so some major announcements will likely wait for that show this fall.



Around 20,000 attendees are expected to visit the halls of the Las Vegas Convention Center, and every digital camera maker is represented here this year. Like CES, many early announcements appeared from major names in the industry, presumably so they don’t get lost in the volume of PMA coverage. Canon announced their 12.2 megapixel XSi last week, which replaces the current XTi.




Pentax also introduced their 14 6 megapixel K20D in the week before the PMA show. The K20D also marked the introduction of a 14.6 megapixel sensor jointly developed with Samsung and manufactured by Samsung.


Samsung has been marketing their own versions of Pentax cameras for the past couple of years, so it was no surprise to see they will be marketing their own version of the Pentax K20D called the GX20. Features and specifications appear all but identical to the Pentax K20D.


Despite the early announcements there were still more introductions as PMA kicked off – and a few surprises in the digital camera arena.

Nikon launches D60 Entry DSLR
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • yyrkoon - Saturday, February 2, 2008 - link

    The OP does have a point. More mega pixels does have an advantage IF you're going to make poster sized pictures, or larger, but dynamic range plays more of a factor in quality images in a lot of situations.

    Look into it I think you'll see what 'we' are saying.
  • madgonad - Saturday, February 2, 2008 - link

    Actually, not entirely true. More megapixels add pixelation as well, which makes for lousy pictures of any size. Software can correct for that, but frequently when resolution has jumped the early adopters got so-so images because the software was not as fine tuned.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now