More BIOS Details

Command Rate (CMD)

The options are Auto, 1N and 2N. A setting of 1N can be used almost exclusively while overclocking, bringing a performance advantage of around 2ns to memory access latency. If memory speeds over DDR3-1800 are desired then a setting of 2N may be required for stability.

CPU/PCI-E Clock Driving Control

The default setting is 800mv, with a range of voltage control offered between 700mv-1000mv. As this is a differential amplifier circuit, increasing voltage may actually decrease the clock signal accuracy due to increased power supply noise. Differential circuits are used in preference to single ended circuits because of their noise rejection and low voltage operating capabilities. Increasing voltage to these circuits in turn increases "nasties" such as overshoot and output clock signal jitter. This in turn counteracts the benefits of using a differential amplifier in the first place. We did experiment with various levels of overvoltage and found no gains in stability whatsoever, further cementing our beliefs that more is not always better.

CPU Clock Skew Control and (G)MCH Clock Skew Control

These two clock skew settings are directly related to the voltage control circuit above. They control the PLL output to both the CPU and Northbridge. Again, as a differential amplifier is used, the level of offset required should never exceed 150ps (Pico seconds) of skew to either the CPU or Northbridge reference clocks. At most, PLL circuits such as these should be "good enough" to retain a jitter level of around 150-200ps (lower is better). For those wishing to experiment, adjustments in the range of 0-200ps are of interest for both of the clock skew functions. As a rule, start with the lowest voltage possible, tune either skew setting, and then monitor for effects if any.

DDR3 Overvoltage Control

Base VDimm is 1.5V. The scale offers between 1.5V-3.05V, more than enough to fry any DDR3 modules. 3.05V is certainly more than enough voltage for extreme benchmarking.

PCI-E Overvoltage Control

This sets a level of overvoltage to the PCI-E bus. The available voltage range is between 1.5V-2.25V. We recommend staying close to stock voltage; higher voltages cause the board to shut down during the boot cycle. Most modern graphics cards do not benefit from higher PCI-E voltages. Increasing this voltage will increase noise and magnetic interference into nearby sensitive circuits. Remember, more voltage always has side effects, it is best to let graphics cards draw their power from the PSU PCI/E connectors rather than through the motherboard.

FSB Overvoltage Control

This voltage setting is more commonly known as VTT. Default is 1.10V, with a maximum of 1.41V available. This voltage is critical for quad-core overclocking. 400FSB will require 1.41V right off the bat if stability is desired. (Ed: When isn't that the goal?) Unfortunately, we have no direct control over GTL (Gunning Transceiver Logic) reference values, which are locked at 67% of VTT for CPU die 1 and 63% of VTT for CPU die 2. On a top-end board like this, we had expected to find GTL adjustments, which can be crucial for finding quad-core CPU stability at high FSB speeds.

(G)MCH Overvoltage Control

Default voltage is 1.45V, and the available voltage scale provides an overvoltage of 0.025-0.775V. There an actual undervoltage of 0.2V from the BIOS set overvoltage. For example, as the stock voltage is set to 1.45V a BIOS setting of +0.50V would imply a voltage of 1.95V. However setting +0.50V gives an actual voltage of 1.75V, suggesting an undervoltage of 0.2V.

Loadline Calibration

Setting this to Enabled reduces Intel's specification voltage droop to the CPU when significant power is drawn. Setting enabled places more strain on the PWM circuit and increases voltage overshoot (within the corrective feedback loop) and settling time from load oscillation, which in turn can affect CPU overclock stability. The trade off is that disabling this setting will require a higher Vcore increasing idle CPU temperatures. Vdroop under load is in the region of 0.06V. Therefore, if a full load voltage of 1.35V is required for stability, a setting of 1.41V will be required for Vcore with Loadline Calibration set to Disabled. The Enabled setting gives a Vdroop of around ~0.02V under load. Users are advised to pick a method that suits their cooling, and use common sense to work out how much voltage is safe at idle if Loadline Calibration is set to Disabled.

CPU Voltage

A range from 0.50V to 2.35V is available, making this board suitable for every type of perceivable over and underclocking. Please note we have not experimented with voltages higher than 1.90V with our cascades cooling, so we cannot guarantee voltages over 1.90V actually work.

BIOS - Continued Final Thoughts on Overclocking
Comments Locked

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • hicookie - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link

    great oc ability and performance,
    air570fsb with e8400
    http://pic.xfastest.com/hicookie/cpu/e8400/570.png">http://pic.xfastest.com/hicookie/cpu/e8400/570.png

    and great in 3Ds
    http://pic.xfastest.com/hicookie/HD3870/LN2/98223....">http://pic.xfastest.com/hicookie/HD3870/LN2/98223....
  • Rob94hawk - Friday, January 4, 2008 - link

    Giver me a screenie of it being Orthos stable for 8 hours and I might actually be impressed.
  • Gary Key - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link

    HiCookie,

    We could have posted similar results with the N2 BIOS, the only problem being that this BIOS will never see the light of day and is designed for one thing and one thing only, high FSB rates at the expense of everything else. Hell, we could have posted the same screenshots that Gigabyte engineering sent us, but what fun is that.

    While it is nice to see those results, it is not exactly fair to post such results without notifying a potential buyer as to how and why they were obtained. Retail E8400s and the latest public release BIOS for this board resulted in max "stable" FSB rates around 520, sure we could do suicide shots and run SPi1M at 550, but try playing Crysis or encoding a movie at those settings. ;)
  • Googer - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link

    I am a Vintage IBM Keyboard fanatic and won't buy a motherboard that does not have PS2 ports, I know there are USB adapters out there but they don't really work as well as a real integrated controller. Gigabyte is my Hero!

    I am not alone. There are many, many more just like me.
  • takumsawsherman - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link

    Two ports for FW400? No ports for FW 800? I can hear the defense swarming now. No one uses FW800, etc., etc. Fewer people use it, true. Perhaps that is due to the fact that Motherboard manufacturers are refusing to provide it, requiring you to buy an add-on board if you don't buy a Mac.
  • eye smite - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link

    From 2k2 to 2k4 I had 3 different gigabyte boards literally fail. Cmos would not clear them, they just physically failed. So my experiences with this manufacturer have left me with some disappointing experience, and I won't buy their products again. I'm sure other people have had better experiences, but for me 3 different boards that were 3 different models failing is enough for me to blackflag them on my money expenditures. I hope they've improved in reliability for it lasting more than a year, but from the looks of this review, they're struggling with it just functioning correctly with all of the included features. Personal opinion, asus, abit, even shuttle would be a better spend in the long run.
  • kilkennycat - Thursday, January 3, 2008 - link

    Historically, not exactly the most stellar enthusiast-motherboard vendor in terms of quality or consistent support...my personal opinion of course.
  • Foxy1 - Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - link

    I’m highly disappointed in AnandTech and its blatant disregard of its loyal readers. There is no excuse for the 9-day “holiday” break in which no articles/reviews were posted.

    I can already hear the writers whine in unison: “Are we not entitled to vacation time to enjoy the holidays?” To which I respond: Is everyday not a vacation for the slothful slackers that write for this site?
  • Rob94hawk - Friday, January 4, 2008 - link

    Do you pay for these reviews or are they free? That's right you little twerp, you pay nothing so STFU NOOB!
  • goinginstyle - Friday, January 4, 2008 - link

    Foxy1,

    Why don't you go back to playing your Nintendo 64 and let mommy tuck you in tonight. Every single post you have around here is negative and constantly attacks the editors or readers. If you have that big of a problem, go to another site or start your own. I would love to comment on your first article. Anyway, if they want to take a vacation, so be it, everyone needs one at least once a year.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now