NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 & GeForce 8800 GT 256MB: Playing with Memory and G92by Anand Lal Shimpi on December 11, 2007 12:00 AM EST
- Posted in
Bar Charts for All
We've had requests for bar charts with all of the cards in them, so without further ado we have the data you've already been presented reformatted into our standard bar graphs. Enjoy:
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
AnnonymousCoward - Wednesday, December 12, 2007 - linkSo the GTS 512 vs the Ultra. The GTS does 26/47 watts less. What's the voltage, 1.5V? So the Ultra draws 17/31 amps more? That's a lotta current.
TheRealMrGrey - Wednesday, December 12, 2007 - linkThe authors of this review failed to comment on the fact that the 8800 GT 512MB is still under stocked and out of stock just about everywhere! Yeah, it's a really great card, but no one can purchase it! So what's the point? Just to make all those people who already have one feel good? Blah!
Mgz - Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - linkso you compare an overclock version of the 8800 GT 256 MB vs the default NO OC HD 3850 and HD 3870 ? at least to make it fair you could compare to an OC version of HD 3850/3870 or compare the non-XXX version to the default clock 3800.
just4U - Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - linkI didn't realize they were comparing stock to overclocked. If they were then it's the only oversight in the review. Well done Anand, Finally a review of the 8800GT 256Meg I don't take with half a pound of salt...
... Maybe just a dash tho! ;)
LRAD - Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - linkMy LCD is 1440 x 900 and it is dissapointing to see so much concern for the high resolutions only. For instance, would a 256 meg solution be fine in the near future for that res? The article beats us over the head with the fact that 256 megs is not enough, but at a lower resolution, might it be?
redly1 - Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - linkThanks for the bar charts at the end. That somehow summed it up for me. Glad to see the power consumption comparison in there too.
Spoelie - Wednesday, December 12, 2007 - linkto be honest i really really like the line graphs more, don't really see what's more clear with the bar graphs
guess it's a never ending debate
Zak - Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - linkI want a high end $500-600 monster that's at least twice as fast as my current 8800GTX that can play Crysis on 24" screen with reasonable framerates:( I'm thinking about getting another GTX and go SLI but I hear some games, Crysis in particular, don't gain much from SLI. And, of course, the day I shell out $500 on another 8800GTX Nvidia will release 9800GTX or something:( Frustrating....
Bal - Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - linkI think every FPS bar chart should have a FPS/$ overlay. You could incorporate it on all your bar charts and allows users to really compare "bang for buck" vs performance for games they are interested in without adding more graphs..
Bal - Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - linkdang no edit...that was supposed to be an original post...