Test Setup

ASUS P5E3 Deluxe Testbed
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Quad Core, 2.4GHz, 8MB Unified Cache, 9x Multiplier, 1066FSB
CPU Voltage 1.1500V Stock
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Power Supply OCZ 1000W
Memory Super Talent DDR3-1866
Memory Settings 5-5-4-12 (DDR3-1066)
Video Cards MSI HD X2900 XT 512MB
Video Drivers ATI Catalyst 7.9
Hard Drive Western Digital 7200RPM 750GB SATA 3/Gbps 16MB Buffer
Optical Drives Plextor PX-B900A, Toshiba SD-H802A
Case Cooler Master Stacker 830 Evo
BIOS 0302
Operating System Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit
.

Test conditions were maintained the same, as much as possible, over the platforms tested. Our game tests were run at settings of 1280x1024 HQ to ensure our MSI HD 2900 XT is not the bottleneck during testing. All results are reported in our charts and color-coded for easier identification of results.

We selected the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 as our processor of choice since it represents one of the better price to performance values in the midrange processor market and is the CPU we will concentrate on in future reviews. We are utilizing Microsoft Vista Home Premium 32-bit as our operating system along with a 4GB memory configuration. Even though Vista 32-bit cannot take advantage of the entire 4GB of memory address space (3.326GB), we found the additional 1.278GB of memory available provided improved performance during multi-tasking events and gaming. We would not recommend anything less than 2GB with Vista Home Premium. We will also provide select Vista 64-bit results in the X38 launch article.

We utilize new drive images on each board in order to minimize any potential driver conflicts. Our 3DMark results are generated utilizing the standard benchmark resolution for each program. We run each benchmark five times, throw out the two low and high scores, and report the remaining score. All results at stock speeds for this article are with memory timings at 5-5-4-12 (DDR3-1066) and at 6-6-6-15 (DDR3-1600) for our overclocking tests. Where possible, memory sub-timings were set exactly the same to ensure consistency between the boards.

Our choice of software applications to test is based on programs that enjoy widespread usage and produce repeatable and consistent results during testing. Microsoft Vista has thrown a monkey wrench into testing as the aggressive nature of the operating system to constantly optimize application loading and retrieval from memory or the storage system presents some interesting obstacles. This along with what we still see as a lack of driver maturity will continue to present problems in the near future with benchmark selections. Our normal process is to change our power settings to performance, delete the contents of the Prefetch folder, and then reboot after each benchmark run. This process results in consistency over the course of benchmark testing. All applications are run with administer privileges.

Note: Due to the preview nature of this article, including the use of a pre-release board, our benchmark test suite will be very limited. A full range of benchmarks will be available on September 24th, provided retail kits arrive as planned.

ASUS P5E3 Deluxe Additional Features Memory Testing
Comments Locked

60 Comments

View All Comments

  • jppoet - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    I though the ICH9R could only provide 6 PCIe lanes?

    How can the third physical x16 slot be wired with 8 lanes?

    Lanes from the ICH9R are also needed for the x1 PCIe slots, each of the NICs and the JMicron JMB363.

    Where are all of these PCIe lanes coming from?
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    I think the X38 is 40 (or 42?) total PCI-E lanes. That would handle the three x16 slots, and the other stuff would come from the SB.
  • hifisoftware - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    What does it mean:
    quote:

    However, based upon our preliminary overclocking tests, if a vertical mounted fan in an air cooling unit such as the Tuniq 120 or water cooling is utilized then additional cooling will be required on the MCH and PWM areas.
    ?

    Will it need some extra heat sinks or just a side fan blowing on existing heatsinks?
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    It means a down blowing fan (Tuniq 120 is side blowing) might be necessary. However, as this is a preliminary X38 article and the latest respin appears to address heat and power concerns, this may become less of a problem on retail mobos.
  • tynopik - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    page 7

    > DDR3 boards will be REGULATED to the very high end of the market for the near future
  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    What's this green team launch on the 25th? A 680i replacement or something on the low end?
  • n0nsense - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    C72 for mainstream and C73 as 680i replacement.
    later something with HybridSLI support for intel.
  • takumsawsherman - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    eSata is fine and all, but at this point, can't we just get some Firewire800? Does it really cost that much more? I can understand that a motherboard destined for OEM is going to need to be pared down. These, however, are enthusiast boards. And Firewire lets you daisy chain, which is nice, but Firewire 400 is getting a little long in the tooth, and you are sharing a bus at that point. Tack the $2 on to the price and do it, already.
  • n0nsense - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    I think Mac coming with 800.
    at least before they switched to intel.
  • mostlyprudent - Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - link

    It's almost laughable how long it's taken to see Firewire800 show up on motherboards. I'm with you - to see a $250 motherboard with Firewire400 instead of 800 is absolutely ridiculous.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now