Half-Life 2: Episode One Performance

Episode One of the new Half-Life 2 series makes use of recent Source engine updates to include Valve's HDR technology. While some people have done HDR that won't allow antialiasing (even on ATI cards), Valve put a high value on building an HDR implementation that everyone can use with whatever settings they want. Consistency of experience is usually not important enough to developers who care about pushing the bleeding edge of technology, so we are very happy to see Valve going down this path.

We use the built-in timedemo feature to benchmark the game. Our timedemo consists of a protracted rocket launcher fight and features much debris and pyrotechnics. The source engine timedemo feature is more like the nettimedemo of Id's Doom 3 engine, in that it plays back more than just the graphics. In fact, Valve includes some fairly intensive diagnostic tools that will reveal almost everything about every object in a scene. We haven't found a good use for this in the context of reviewing computer hardware, but our options are always open.

The highest visual quality settings possible were used including the "reflect all" setting which is normally not enabled by default, and anisotropic filtering was set at 8x. While the Source engine is notorious for giving great framerates for almost any hardware setup, we find the game isn't as enjoyable if it isn't running at at least 30fps. This is very attainable even at the highest resolution we tested on most cards, and thus our target framerate is a little higher in this game than others.

Half Life 2: Episode 1 Performance

Under Half-Life 2 with Valve's HDR enabled, ATI rises to the top. The X1900 GT shows a sustainable advantage across the board. Of course, all of these cards are playable at the highest settings. The value of a few frames per second is completely up to the end user, but a narrow margin of victory is not as important with the Source engine as it in other cases.

Half Life 2: Episode One - No AA
 
800x600
1024x768
1280x1024
1600x1200
1920x1440
ATI Radeon X800 GTO
126.9
81.2
50.4
35.1
24.3
ATI Radeon X1600 XT
102.3
65.8
41
29.1
20.4
ATI Radeon X1800 GTO
168.9
111.2
69.6
48.7
34.2
ATI Radeon X1900 GT
231.1
170.6
109.7
78.4
55.5
ATI Radeon X1900 XT 256MB
223.4
206.9
146.7
104.8
74.9
ATI Radeon X1900 XT
247.7
220.9
152.6
109.1
78.2
NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
110.9
72.1
44.7
30.6
20.9
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS
130.4
86.3
53.4
37.2
23.8
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT
164.8
110
68.1
46.6
32.3
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
200.1
140
92
64.1
45.2
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
203
158.3
104.5
73
51
XFX GeForce 7900 GS 480M Extreme
202.6
159.2
105.8
74.2
52.2
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
216.1
166.9
103.9
73.2
51

Half Life 2: Episode 1 Performance

Interestingly, when we enable AA, NVIDIA becomes more competitive. This is not usually the case, and especially not with HL2. At higher resolutions, ATI's X1900 GT does retake the performance lead from the overclocked 7900 GS, but even the stock 7900 GS remains competitive up through 1600x1200.

Half Life 2: Episode One - 4X AA
 
800x600
1024x768
1280x1024
1600x1200
1920x1440
ATI Radeon X800 GTO
77.5
49.7
30.5
21.3
14.5
ATI Radeon X1600 XT
89.2
57.8
36.4
24.5
16.3
ATI Radeon X1800 GTO
141.3
91.4
57.7
40.4
28.3
ATI Radeon X1900 GT
193.1
129.8
83.3
59.6
41.9
ATI Radeon X1900 XT 256MB
215.8
171.6
113.5
80.3
57.8
ATI Radeon X1900 XT
235.8
181.4
118.5
84.2
60.6
NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
83.7
54.1
30
 
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS
121.6
79.9
48.5
33.6
20.5
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT
146.7
96.4
58.6
40.4
24.9
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
177.6
121.5
75.5
52.8
34
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
185.7
131
81.3
57.1
36.8
XFX GeForce 7900 GS 480M Extreme
192.5
139
86.4
60.8
39.1
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
208.7
150.4
92.1
65
41.4
F.E.A.R. Performance Quake 4 Performance
Comments Locked

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • sirfergy - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    Woot had this card for $139 a few weeks ago. So glad I jumped!
  • artifex - Thursday, September 7, 2006 - link

    I wish I'd bought 3 and sold them on eBay. Instead, I bought 0. :(

    http://www.woot.com/blog/BlogEntry.aspx?BlogEntryI...">woot entry

  • Spoelie - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    I dunno the situation in the US, but Europe is seeing an interesting war. We have 7900GT's costing 230€, right above there is the X1900XT 256mb at 244€ and the X1900XT 512mb at 280€, with the overclocked 7900GT's overlapping in price with the X1900XT's.

    Check it on www.alternate.de for example.

    At these prices, the X1900XT's are a pretty sweet deal, and warrant the little extra money paid over the 7900GT imho.
  • Spoelie - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    just to be clear, those are the minimum prices found, in general you have about price parity between the GT's and XT 256mb, with a few superclocked cards costing as much or more as the XT 512mb...

    Incredible value in the 200-300€/$ range imho, with cards that just months ago were in the 300-500€/$ range
  • Spacecomber - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    The concluding paragraphs on pages 4 and 5 are identical (i.e., the proper paragraph is missing for the XFX 480M Extreme vs. Stock Performance section).
  • DerekWilson - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    thanks, fixed
  • Spoelie - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    there's also a layout error in the table on page 9
  • TheLiberalTruth - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    I don't know if it's just me or what, but I can't get any page from this article after 1 to load. :\
  • peldor - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    The BFG 7600GT is down to $115 after rebate at Newegg.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now