ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe
Basic Features


ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe
Market Segment High-End/Enthusiast
CPU Interface Socket T (Socket 775)
Chipset Intel 975X + ICH7R
CPU Support Core 2 Duo, Pentium D, Celeron D, Pentium XE, LGA-775 based Pentium 4
Thermal Design 8-phase power
Fan-less Heatpipe Cooling
ASUS Stack Cool for OC
Default Bus Speed 1066 (533/266)
Bus Speeds 100 to 500 in 1MHz Increments
Memory Speeds DDR2 at Auto,400,533,667,711,800,889,1067
PCIe Speeds Auto, 90 to 150 in 1MHz Increments
Performance Mode Auto, Standard Turbo
AI Overclocking Manual, Auto, Overclock Profile, AI N.O.S.
PCI Auto, 33.3, To CPU
Core Voltage Auto, 1.225V (Actual CPU voltage) to 1.7000V in 0.0125V increments
FSB Termination Voltage Auto, 1.2v, 1.3v, 1.4v, 1.5v
MCH (Memory Controller Hub) Voltage Auto, 1.50v, 1.55v, 1.60v, 1.65v
ICH (SB) Voltage Auto, 1.05v, 1.20v
PEG Link Mode Auto, Slow, Normal, Fast, Faster
CPU Clock Multiplier Auto, 4x-25x in 1X increments
DRAM Voltage Auto, 1.8V to 2.4V in .05v increments
DRAM Timing Control 9 Options
Hyper Path 3 Auto, Disabled, Enabled
Multi-GPU Option CrossFire (2 X8 PCIe)
Memory Slots Four 240-pin DDR2 DIMM Slots
Dual-Channel Configuration
Unbuffered ECC/non ECC Memory to 8GB Total
Intel MPT (Memory Pipeline Technology)
ASUS HyperPath3
Expansion Slots 2 PCIe X16
2 PCIe X1
3 PCI Slots
Onboard SATA/RAID 3 SATA2 3Gb/s Drives by Intel ICH7R
(RAID 0,1,5) PLUS
2 SATA2 3 Gb/s Drives by JMicronJMB363
(RAID 0,1) (1 internal,1 external) PLUS
2 SATA2 3 Gb/s Drives by Sil4723
(supports RAID 10 by combining iCH7R drives with Sil4723 drives)
TOTAL - 7 Sata2 3Gb/s drives
Onboard IDE/IDE RAID One Standard ATA133/100/66 (2 drives) by JMicron JMB363
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 8 USB 2.0 ports supported by ICH7R
2 Firewire 1394a by TI
Onboard LAN DUAL PCIe Gigabit by Marvel 88E8053 for AI Net2, PLUS
WiFi 54Mbps supporting 802.11g
Onboard Audio Azalia HD Audio by Realtek ALC882M
8 channel codec
Supports Dolby Master Studio including Dolby Digital Live
Power Connectors 24-pin ATX
4-pin EATX 12V
Back Panel I/O Ports 1 x PS/2 Keyboard
1 x PS/2 Mouse
1 x Serial
1 x Audio I/O Panel (6 plug programmable)
1 x Optical S/PDIF Out Port
1 x Coaxial S/PDIF Out Port
1 x IEEE 1394a Firewire
1 x External SATA2
2 x RJ45 LAN
1 x Wireless LAN antenna
4 x USB
BIOS Revision AMI 701 - July 8, 2006

Current thinking in overclocking options is to provide very fine adjustments for voltages over a very wide range of control - particularly in the memory voltage control. ASUS has done this on other recent boards, like the AM2-based M2N32-SLI Deluxe. However, the P5W-DH only extends to 2.4V compared to the 2.5V on the M2N32-SLI and granularity of the adjustments is a pretty coarse 0.5V compared to 0.2V on the M2N32-SLIl. We suspect this is because the P5W-DH is mainly a refresh to the existing ASUS P5WD2-E, which we reviewed at ASUS P5WD2-E Premium: Intel 975X for the Enthusiast when it was introduced in January.

Click to enlarge

As you will see below, overclocking was outstanding, but we suspect that higher voltage adjustments on the MCH would allow even higher overclocks. The ASUS stops at 1.65V, while the Intel BadAxe goes on to 1.725V. We would welcome ASUS raising the top voltage on the MCH. There are reports that modding the ASUS to reach 1.9V MCH allows FSB overclocks to almost 500 instead of the current limit of around 440 to 450 FSB.

If you compare the new board to the earlier P5WD2-E you will find the board is basicly the same. The storage controllers have been changed to a Silicon Image that allows a port-multiplier type connect to one of the ICH7 ports. This allows driverless RAID. The board has also dropped the PCIe x4 slot. Asus also replaced the Marvel SATA/PATA controller with the updated JMicron chip. In general. though, our comments in the P5WD2-E review still accurately describe the board's strengths and weaknesses.

The P5W-DH Deluxe adds the lower voltages required by Core 2 Duo and meets the voltage stability requirements for Conroe. Both of these factors are why almost all existing Socket 775 boards cannot handle Core 2 Duo. Both a BIOS and a hardware change are required for proper operation with Conroe.

Basic Performance

All-in-all the ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe is one of the best Conroe boards we have tested. The 975X chipset is definitely more mature than current P965 chipset motherboards. Having said that, there were still several BIOS revisions during our testing to update certain peculiarities in the current steppings of Core 2 Duo.

The ASUS board was every bit as stable with Core 2 Duo as the Intel BadAxe, which for a long time was the only board that would operate with Conroe. The ASUS also implements the ability to adjust X6800 (2.93EE) ratios both up and down, which is a feature of this processor, but is not supported on all boards. The ASUS overclocks further than any other stock board we tested, and it recovers from bad overclocks gracefully. If the OC is close a reboot will usually allow further adjustment. If the OC is far off you need to physically turn off the power then restart to further adjust the BIOS. This is a much more friendly board for OC than the Intel BadAxe, for instance, that will not recover from any failed OC without a full power down and sometimes a CMOS clear.

The ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe also fully supports dual X8 CrossFire. The Enthusiast wanting to overclock Conroe as far as possible or anyone wanting to run ATI multi-GPU on an Intel chipset will be very happy with the P5W-DH. We liked the board enough that it became our new standard board for our DDR2 memory testing platform.

Overclocking

ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe
Overclocking Testbed
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Dual Core, 2.67GHz, 4MB Unified Cache
1066FSB, 10x Multiplier
CPU Voltage: 1.525V (default 1.2V)
Cooling: Tuniq Tower 120 Air Cooling
Power Supply: OCZ GameXstream 700W
Memory: Corsair Twin2X2048-PC2-8500C5 (2x1GB)
(Micron Memory Chips)
Hard Drive Hitachi 250GB 7200RPM SATA2 16MB Cache
Maximum OC:
(Standard Ratio)
400x10
4000MHz (+50%)

The decision was reached to evaluate motherboards with the E6700 (2.67) processor, as it represents the mid-range of Conroe pricing. Of course, all Conroe processors except for the top X6800 are multiplier locked, which limits options in overclocking. Like Socket 478 that does not appear a huge handicap, since the stock E6700 reached a 50% overclock at 4.0 GHz. Our new OC test bed uses an excellent air cooler in the Tuniq Tower, and you are likely to experience lower overclocks with stock cooling.


The ASUS P5W-DH also reached 4.0GHz with an X6800 (stock 266 x15 at 1.575V) and an E6600 at 445FSB x 9x multiplier. All of these results are outstanding, representing overclocks at stock ratio as high as 67%.

With the wide range of adjustable memory ratios and voltages, memory was set to end up somewhere around DDR2-800 3-3-3-9 at 2.2V. This is really easy with the ASUS P5W-DH BIOS, since the BIOS shows the resulting memory speed when you adjust the FSB speed. This means you don't have to calculate the resulting memory speed when trying to set up a rational overclock, which is a really convenient feature for most enthusiasts.

Overclocking is always dependent on the chip you have and the capabilities of the motherboard. Processors vary in their OC abilities, and OC is never a given. However, we are confident that wherever you can go with your CPU it is not likely the ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe will be holding back your overclocking efforts.

Chipsets Intel 975XBX
Comments Locked

123 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gary Key - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    quote:

    "The board was very stable with our X6800 and X6600 Core 2 Duo processors ..."


    I am surprised I did not see this posted on a news site somewhere announcing Intel has a X6600. ;-) The line was corrected this morning to (X6800, E6700, E6600) although late last night my mind was probably thinking unlocked E6600 equals X6600 for some reason. Thanks for the notice! :)
  • drarant - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    In recent months the memory market has moved from a 1GB kit to a 2BG kit being the common memory configuration.

    2GB*

    Excellent article, I'm assuming the OCing results were default voltages on the chipsets and/or the cpu?
  • drarant - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    page 11, 2nd to last sentence*
  • Patsoe - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    quote:

    If you compare the new board to the earlier P5WD2-E you will find the board is virtually the same.


    To be honest, I would say it's quite different!

    The storage controllers have been changed a lot... there is now a port-multiplier type of SiI chip that connects to one of the ICH7 ports, which provides driverless (!) RAID. Also, the previous board had a Marvell SATA/PATA controller instead of the JMicron controller.

    For another difference: the new board is missing the PCIe 4x slot, too.

    Anyway, thanks for the great overview! And it's amazing how fast after launch you got this up.
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    Thanks for your comment. We added information to the P5W-DH page with a little more info on the differences from the earlier board.
  • nicolasb - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    ...is what is the actual impact on system performance of different memory speeds and timings? Possibly you guys actually derive a direct erotic thrill simply from knowing that your memory timings are 4-3-3-9 ;-) but what the rest of us care about is whether any given timings actually provide a tangible improvement to running applications. If I spend an extra £200 on memory, am I going to get an extra 10fs in a certain game, or just an extra 1fps if I'm lucky? That's what I want to know.

    Conroe is a new chip and it is by no means obvious (to me, anyway) whether the speed/latency of the memory will have a greater or lesser impact on the performance of the system than is the case for Netburst or A64 chips.

    So, how about re-running some of your benchmarks on one particular board and producing results for different memory speeds and latencies?
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    The original plan was to publish a Conroe memory article prior to this huge motherboard and memory roundup. The move forward of the Conroe launch by two weeks shifted our schedule quite a bit, as we discussed in the Buying Guide. we have found the timings DDR2 memory can achieve give a rough idea of the performance hierarchy on Conroe. That is 1067 at 4-4-4 is a bit faster than 800 at 3-3-3 is faster than 667 3-2-3. 667 is generally faster than nything slower regardless of timings.

    With 13 DDR2 kits it was impossible to do proper and complete performance testing on all the memory on Conroe and still deliver an article when you want to read it. There will definitely be followup reviews of memory on Conroe anwsering your questions in detail. We knew there would be complaints from some, but we also hoped you could understnad the roundup is posting 4 days after an early Conroe launch - and you can't even buy Core 2 Duo until 7/27 or later.

    We wanted to provide solid info as soon as possible for those planning a Conroe purchase. We thought our finding that almost any Elpida value DDR2 will do DDR2-800 4-3-3 at about 2.2v was big news you would want to know, we will fill in the rest of the performance data as soon as we can.

    As it is the roundup is over 15,000 words and one of the largest articles ever published at AT - in word length - and we really tried to be brief in each review. We really like giving our readers exactly what they want, but sometimes the realities of time and volume shift our priorities.
  • Tanclearas - Thursday, July 20, 2006 - link

    Although I can understand what you're saying, maybe the following should not have been included in the introductory page.

    quote:

    We have tested seven 2GB DDR2 kits priced at less than $200 to see how they really compare to high-priced DDR2 on Conroe. You may be surprised by the results.


    I guess the only surprise was that the comparison wasn't there. :P

    Honestly, I tried to jump right to that section only to find rather useless comparisons of ridiculously expensive memory (which I won't buy) and "value" (read cheap) memory (which I won't buy). Also, can you really tell me that it was much of a surprise that the expensive memory all topped out at roughly the same speed (~1100, 5-5/4-5-15)? Nor am I particularly surprised the value memory could overclock reasonably well, but how about tests of the memory that I think most of your readers are likely to buy? I've been looking at DDR2, and you can get memory rated at DDR2-800 for a little more than the DDR2-667/533 variety, and still a lot less than the DDR2-1000 modules.

    I know that you were pressed for time, especially with the launch being pushed forward. I just think (and it is only an opinion) that other tests should have been given priority over the ones you've completed.
  • kmmatney - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    Also, what motherboard was used for the DDR tests? Often, value RAM is paired with a "value" motherboard. Value RAM may not look so well when paired with a value motherboard. I'm wondering how cheap we can go for reasonable peformance :)
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, July 19, 2006 - link

    quote:

    So, how about re-running some of your benchmarks on one particular board and producing results for different memory speeds and latencies?


    We stated at the end of page 18 that we will be publishing performance results of the value memory roundup shortly. The amount of time required to test these seven modules at four different settings in several different applications was incredible and warrants a separate article update.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now