OCZ PC4000 1024MB EB Platinum Edition

OCZ is a well-known brand of enthusiast products - memory, power supplies, flash memory and more. In the past two years, OCZ was normally at or near the top of roundups and reviews of high-performance memory. After struggling several years ago, OCZ fought back and, today, is regarded as top-quality memory with some of the best Customer Service in the business.

The OCZ trademark chrome heatspreaders announce the new DDR500 as Platinum Edition memory. In this case, the 1GB DIMMs are rated EB, or Enhanced Bandwidth. A DDR500 1GB DIMM rated at 3-3-2-8 timings certainly deserves the EB name, but in fact, the 1GB DIMMs perform even better.

Specifications

OCZ rates their 2GB high-speed kit at DDR500, in-between the spec for Corsair 433 and Gigaram 533.

OCZ PC4000 1024MB EB Platinum Memory Specifications
Number of DIMMs & Banks 2 DS
DIMM Size
Total Memory
1GB
2GB
Rated Timings 3-3-2-8 at DDR500
Rated Voltage 2.6V

We also see a low voltage requirement with the OCZ 2 GB kit - very similar to the voltage specified by Corsair for their 2GB kit.

Test Results

OCZ PC4000 1024MB EB Platinum (DDR500) - 2x1GB Double-Bank
CPU Ratio at 2.4GHz Memory
Speed
Memory Timings
& Voltage
Quake3
fps
Sandra UNBuffered Sandra Standard
Buffered
Super PI 2M places
(time in sec)
Wolfenstein - Radar - Enemy Territory fps
12x200 400DDR 2-3-2-7
2.5V 1T
545.1 INT 2657
FLT 2715
INT 5970
FLT 5902
80 120.4
11x218 436DDR 2-3-2-7
2.7V 1T
552.4 INT 2831
FLT 2974
INT 6222
FLT 6203
80 121.5
10x240 480DDR 2.5-3-2-7
2.6V 1T
560.5 INT 2976
FLT 3100
INT 6447
FLT 6376
79 123.1
9x267 533DDR 2.5-3-2-7
2.7V 1T
564.7 INT 3213
FLT 3292
INT 6684
FLT 6603
78 124.0
9x275
(2.48GHz)
Highest MEM Speed
550 DDR
3-3-2-7
2.7V 1T
581.2 INT 3351
FLT 3514
INT 6869
FLT 6774
76 127.6
To be considered stable for test purposes, Quake3 benchmark, UT2003 Demo, Super PI, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 had to complete without incident. Any of these, and in particular Super PI, will crash a less-than stable memory configuration.

OCZ did not reveal to us the manufacturer of the memory chips used in their 500EB 1GB DIMMs. There was also nothing on the DIMMs to help us in identifying the memory manufacturer. However, after running our full benchmarks on the OCZ PC4000 EB Platinum, we would be very surprised if the memory is other than Infineon. Performance from DDR400 to DDR480 is virtually identical to Corsair even down to the low voltage requirement, but performance continues on to DDR550 while still only needing the same very low 2.7V memory voltage.

Like the Corsair, this is a memory that does not need a special board with super high voltages to get the best from the memory. You can get the best from these 1GB with almost any decent motherboard, since we never needed more than 2.7V for stable performance at any speed.

We would really be interested in exactly which Infineon chips are used in this OCZ memory. It is either a slightly different chip than the Corsair, since it goes much higher in overclocking, or OCZ is doing some interesting binning of Infineon chips - something that would also not surprise us.

Gigaram 2GB Dual Channel PC-4200 Performance Comparisons
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - link

    The published "ram guy" link is the one printed on the Corsair retail package. We also tried the link and it connects to the Corsair Help Forums.

    If you have another link please list it in the Comments.
  • Madellga - Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - link

    I am using this OCZ kit (EL, not the one in the review) since August on a San Diego / DFI combo. It goes to 230@2.5-3-2 with 2.7V and 1T.

    I tried also 4 sticks (a friend bought it also) and we made to 220@2.5-3-2 with 2.7V and 2T.

    I didn't try above 230, as the OCZ Guy pointed the 230 to be the limit. I am using 180/200 or 166/200 to overclock the San Diego, leaving the memory between 220-230.

    It is rock solid, it can Prime all night without mistakes.

    I prefer to have more memory even if a bit slower - it is much worse to have Windows writting to the swap file.
  • ElFenix - Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - link

    just to see how much the difference is when going from 1 gig to 2 gigs
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - link

    We tested many applications with 1GB vs. 2GB of ram. BF2 greatly benefited, but nothing else we've tested so far really improved much with 2GB. That will likely change with the release of newer, more demanding apps and games that take advantage of the new dual-core processors.

    One High-Performance memory company told us that after they saw what 2GB did for BF2 they ran 1 vs 2 on every game they could get their hands on. The goal was to publish benchmarks to show the advantage of buyers using 2GB instead of 1GB - and sell more memory. They privately told us they also found no real performance improvement in anything other than BF2.

    We do expect 2GB/4GB will make a difference in multithreaded and true 64-bit apps in the future. Of course multi-tasking also normally benefits from more memory.
  • Johnmcl7 - Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - link

    The only other game I've seen people recommending 2GB for is the FEAR demo but of course it's not final yet.

    Good read though, I thought the discussion on the A64 and the various ram issues was particiularly useful.

    John
  • Margalus - Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - link

    2Gb make a good difference in WoW also.
  • Vesperan - Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - link

    Wesley,
    the memory combinations on the 'Why 1GB Dimms?' page could be shown as a 2x2 matrix (with 2/4 dimms on one axis and 1T/2T on other). Performance at each combination could be shown - except of course for 4 dimms at 1T. Currently the article contrasts the 2 dimms and 1T combination with 4 dimms and 2T, could it be possible for you to add 2 dimms at 2T?

    I would just like see the effect of 1T to 2T, or 2 dimms to 4 dimms ceterus paribus - that is, all else being equal. While I dont think the missing combination (2 dimms at 2T) will undermine your arguments made, I would like to see how it fits into the overall picture.
  • Phantronius - Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - link

    I did, BF2 runs so much better as a result
  • Phantronius - Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - link

    1st!!! Honestly, since i've given up overclocking, I threw in 2 1gig Platnium Corsair XMS modules in my new Athlon 64 setup and it works fine and stable, couldn't give a shit if my "timings" are as *looot* as they could be.
  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - link

    Well good for you

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now