CPU Benchmark Performance: Legacy Tests

In order to gather data to compare with older benchmarks, we are still keeping a number of tests under our ‘legacy’ section. This includes all the former major versions of CineBench (R15, R11.5, R10) as well as Geekbench 4 and 5. We won’t be transferring the data over from the old testing into Bench, otherwise, it would be populated with 200 CPUs with only one data point, so it will fill up as we test more CPUs like the others.

We are using DDR5 memory on the Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X, as well as Intel's 12th Gen (Alder Lake) processors at the following settings:

  • DDR5-5200 CL44- Ryzen 7000
  • DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen

All other CPUs such as Ryzen 5000 and 3000 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4.

Legacy

(6-1a) CineBench R10 ST

(6-1b) CineBench R10 MT

(6-2a) CineBench R11.5 ST

(6-2b) CineBench R11.5 MT

(6-3a) CineBench R15 ST

(6-3b) CineBench R15 MT

(8-1a) Geekbench 4.0 ST

(8-1b) Geekbench 4.0 MT

(8-1c) Geekbench 5 Single Thread

(8-1d) Geekbench 5 Multi-Thread

In our fabled and older school selection of benchmarks passed their 'sell by date', the Ryzen 9 7950X wins in every one of these tests, both single-threaded and multi-threaded. In the purely single-threaded tests, the Ryzen 5 7600X is the next best, although it is more in line with the Ryzen 7 5800X as we've consistently seen in our multi-threaded results all throughout this review.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Rendering Gaming Performance: 720p and Lower
POST A COMMENT

205 Comments

View All Comments

  • phoenix_rizzen - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    The Spec graphs are hard to read as you don't have the CPUs listed in the correct order. You should switch dark blue to be 5950X and light blue to be 3950X. Right now you have the CPUs (graphs) listed as:

    Intel
    7950X
    3950X
    5950X

    It really should be:
    Intel
    7950X
    5950X
    3950X

    That would make it a lot easier to see the generational improvements. Sort things logically, numerically. :)
    Reply
  • Otritus - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    @Ryan Smith please do this. I was also having difficulty reading the Spec graph. Reply
  • Gavin Bonshor - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    I apologize for doing it this way. I promise I'll sort it in the morning (UK based) Reply
  • yeeeeman - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    Retaking the high end for 1 month. Reply
  • yeeeeman - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    TBH, what I am most excited about is the zen 4 laptop parts, like the phoenix apu, with 8 zen 4 cores, rdna 3 igpu, lpddr5, 4nm cpu, 5nm gpu, that should bring some clear improvements over the 4000 series ryzen which are still amazingly good. 5000 and 6000 series haven't brought much improvements over the 4000 series, like my 4800H, so I am curious to see what the 7000 series will bring. Already dreaming about a fully metal body, slim laptop, 14-16 inch, OLED, 90Hz minimum, laminated screen, preferably touch and 360 hinge, 1.5kg top. that will be nice. Reply
  • abufrejoval - Wednesday, September 28, 2022 - link

    Since you're hinting that Intel will change things, there is much less of a chance for Intel to catch up in the mobile sector on 10nm.

    For the laptops I see a different story at almost every five Watts of permissible power for the CPUside of things. But much less change between the 4000-7000 Zen generations at the same energy settings.

    Any hopes for a more-than-casual gaming iGPU can't but fail, because AMD can't overcome the DRAM bandwidth limitations, unless they were to start with stuff like extra channels of RAM on the die carrier like Apple (or HBM).

    And that basically leaves 13% of IPC improvements, some efficiency gains but much less clock gains, because that's mostly additional Wattage on the desktop parts, not available on battery.

    I haven't tried the 6800U yet, but even if it were to be 100% better than my 5800U, that's still too slow a GPU to drive my Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 13ACN notebook's 2560x1600 display full throttle. Even 4x speed won't change that, it just takes a 250 Watt GPU to drive that resolution more like 350 Watts for 4k.

    I just bought a nice 3k 90Hz OLED 5825U based 14" notebook (Asus Zenbook 14) for one of my sons, full metal slim but without touch for less than €1000 including taxes and he's completely stunned by the combination of display brightness (he tends to use it outside) and battery life.

    As long as you think of it as a 2D machine that will do fine display Google Earth in 3D, you'll be happy. If you try to turn it into a gaming laptop it's outright grief or severe compromises.

    And I just don't see how a dGPU on an APU makes much sense, because you just purchase capabilities twice without the ability to combine them in something that actually works. Those hybrid approaches were only ever good in theory.
    Reply
  • Makaveli - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    "I have a 1440p 144Hz monitor and I play at 1080p just because that's what I'm used to."

    *Insert ryan reynolds meme

    Buy why?
    Reply
  • Gavin Bonshor - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    Because I fear that if I drop below 144 Hz in any title, that my life wouldn't be able to cope. Maybe I just need to upgrade from an RX 5700 XT? Reply
  • Makaveli - Tuesday, September 27, 2022 - link

    Ah yes its time.

    Go RDNA3
    Reply
  • kryn5 - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    "Despite modern-day graphics cards, especially the flagships, now at the level where 1440p and 4K gaming is viable, 1080p is still a very popular resolution to play games at; I have a 1440p 144Hz monitor and I play at 1080p just because that's what I'm used to."

    I... what?
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now