The Intel 12th Gen Core i9-12900K Review: Hybrid Performance Brings Hybrid Complexity

474 Comments

View All Comments

• Spunjji - Friday, November 5, 2021 - link

  N7 is a little more dense than Intel's 10nm-class process - 15-20% in comparable product lines (e.g. Renoir vs. Ice Lake, Lakefield vs. Zen 3 compute chiplet). There is no indication that Intel 7 is more dense than previous iterations of 10nm. N7 also appears to have better power characteristics.
  
  It's difficult to tell, though, because Intel are pushing much harder on clock speeds than AMD and have a wider core design, both of which would increase power draw even on an identical process.

• Blastdoor - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

  I’m a little surprised by the low level of attention to performance/watt in this review. ArsTechnica gave a bit more info in that regard, and Alder Lake looks terrible on performance/watt.
  
  If Intel had achieved this performance with similar efficiency to AMD I would have bought Intel stock today.
  
  But the efficiency numbers here are truly awful. I can see why this is being released as an enthusiast desktop processor -- that's the market where performance/watt matters least. In the mobile and data center markets (ie, the Big markets), these efficiency numbers are deal breakers. AMD appears to have nothing to fear from Intel in the markets that matter most.

• meacupla - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

  Yeah, the power consumption of 12900K is quite bad.
  From other reviews, it's pretty clear that highest end air cooling is not enough for 12900K, and you will need a thick 280mm or 360mm water cooler to keep 12900K cool.

• Ian Cutress - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

  I think there are some issues with temperature readings on ADL. A lot of software showcases 100C with only 3 P-cores loaded, but even with all cores loaded, the CPU doesn't de-clock at that temp. My MSI AIO has a temperature display, and it only showed 75C at load. I've got questions out in a few places - I think Intel switched some of the thermal monitoring stuff inside and people are polling the wrong things. Other press are showing 100C quite easily too. I'm asking MSI how their AIO had 75C at load, but I'm still waiting on an answer. An ASUS rep said that 75-80C should be normal under load. So why everything is saying 100C I have no idea.

• Blastdoor - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

  Note that the ArsTechnica review looks at power draw from the wall, so unaffected by sensor issues.

• jamesjones44 - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

  They also show the 5900x somehow drawing more power than a 5950x at full load. While I'm sure Intel is drawing more power, I question their testing methods given we know there is very little chance of a 5950x fully loaded drawing less than a 5900x unless they won or lost the CPU lottery.

• TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

  techspot and TPU also show that, and it has been explained before that the 5950x gets the premium dies and runs at a lower core voltage then the 5900x, thus it pulls less power despite having more cores.

• haukionkannel - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

  5950x use better chips than 5900x... that is the reason for power usage!

• vegemeister - Saturday, November 6, 2021 - link

  5950X can hit the current limit when all cores are loaded, so the power consumption folds back.

• meacupla - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

  75C reading from the AIO, presumably a reading from the base plate, is quite hot, I must say.