CPU Performance: Windows 11 vs Windows 10

There are going to be a lot of Windows 11 vs Windows 10 testing over the next few months, based on different CPUs, chipsets, configurations, and even situations where CPUs are replaced and drivers need to be reinstalled to get full performance. Windows 11 is still young, and most of our tests worked (WSL did not, will need to find out why). In this instance both OS installs were fresh and default with all updates and updated drivers. We haven't had time to run our gaming tests, those should come soon.

(1-1) Agisoft Photoscan 1.3, Complex Test(1-2) AppTimer: GIMP 2.10.18(2-1) 3D Particle Movement v2.1 (non-AVX)(2-2) 3D Particle Movement v2.1 (Peak AVX)(2-3) yCruncher 0.78.9506 ST (250m Pi)(2-4) yCruncher 0.78.9506 MT (2.5b Pi)(2-4b) yCruncher 0.78.9506 MT (250m Pi)(2-5) NAMD ApoA1 Simulation(2-6) AI Benchmark 0.1.2 Total(3-1) DigiCortex 1.35 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)(3-2b) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 129x129, 550 Yr(3-3) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test(3-4c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid(4-1) Blender 2.83 Custom Render Test(4-2) Corona 1.3 Benchmark(4-3a) Crysis CPU Render at 320x200 Low(4-5) V-Ray Renderer(4-7a) CineBench R23 Single Thread(4-7b) CineBench R23 Multi-Thread(5-1a) Handbrake 1.3.2, 1080p30 H264 to 480p Discord(5-1b) Handbrake 1.3.2, 1080p30 H264 to 720p YouTube(5-1c) Handbrake 1.3.2, 1080p30 H264 to 4K60 HEVC(5-2a) 7-Zip 1900 Compression(5-2b) 7-Zip 1900 Decompression(5-2c) 7-Zip 1900 Combined Score(5-3) AES Encoding(5-4) WinRAR 5.90 Test, 3477 files, 1.96 GB(7-1) Kraken 1.1 Web Test(7-2) Google Octane 2.0 Web Test(7-3) Speedometer 2.0 Web Test(8-1c) Geekbench 5 Single Thread(8-1d) Geekbench 5 Multi-Thread

Windows 11 has a small effect on some of our Multi-Threaded tests, such as y-cruncher, Speedometer, and AES, but for the most part it's quite minimal.

CPU Benchmark Performance: E-Core CPU Benchmark Performance: DDR5 vs DDR4
Comments Locked

474 Comments

View All Comments

  • blanarahul - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    "Using all the eight E-cores, at 3.9 GHz, brings the package power up to 48 W total."

    This sounds amazing for inexpensive (i3 class) laptop processors since Gracemont sips power and doesn't take much die space.
  • Great_Scott - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    I'd actually prefer a all-Gracemont CPU for Laptops. Seems like it would be better for intentionally maximizing battery life. Skylake+ level performance is perfect for most use cases.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Indeed, they have it backwards for laptops, it should be 2-6 gracemont cores then 1-2 power cores for a CPU, not the other way around.
  • karmapop - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    I'm guessing you missed the articles describing the two separate mobile dies for Alder Lake? We've got Alder Lake-P (6P + 8E) for performance mobile designs, and Alder Lake-M (2P + 8E) for the ultra mobile low power SKUs.
  • at_clucks - Saturday, November 6, 2021 - link

    I'm very happy with exactly-Skylake-level performance in my desktop :). I'd more than gladly take the same performance and cut the power in half. I'm sure there's quite a big market for that kind of performance in a lower powered package regardless of form factor (mobile, desktop).
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, November 9, 2021 - link

    There really is. I may well pick up a 2P+8E ADL laptop, but a desktop box would suit me better
  • mode_13h - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    Keep an eye on ASRock. They sell mini-ITX motherboards with that class of SoC.

    https://www.asrock.com/mb/index.us.asp#Intel%20CPU
  • Spunjji - Friday, November 5, 2021 - link

    That's actually not great in power terms compared to what AMD can do with 8 Zen 3 cores on TSMC N7 - but yeah, in the context of die area, something built around (say) 2 P cores and 4 E cores can probably put in a very good showing for inexpensive devices.
  • Netmsm - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Becomes competitive to previous AMD's.
  • EnglishMike - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Previous AMDs support DDR5 and PCR 5.0?

    Huh. That one slipped by me...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now