Gaming Performance

World of Tanks enCore

Albeit different to most of the other commonly played MMO or massively multiplayer online games, World of Tanks is set in the mid-20th century and allows players to take control of a range of military based armored vehicles. World of Tanks (WoT) is developed and published by Wargaming who are based in Belarus, with the game’s soundtrack being primarily composed by Belarusian composer Sergey Khmelevsky. The game offers multiple entry points including a free-to-play element as well as allowing players to pay a fee to open up more features. One of the most interesting things about this tank based MMO is that it achieved eSports status when it debuted at the World Cyber Games back in 2012.

World of Tanks enCore is a demo application for a new and unreleased graphics engine penned by the Wargaming development team. Over time the new core engine will implemented into the full game upgrading the games visuals with key elements such as improved water, flora, shadows, lighting as well as other objects such as buildings. The World of Tanks enCore demo app not only offers up insight into the impending game engine changes, but allows users to check system performance to see if the new engine runs optimally on their system.

GTX 980: World of Tanks enCore, Average FPSGTX 980: World of Tanks enCore, 95th Percentile

Grand Theft Auto V

The highly anticipated iteration of the Grand Theft Auto franchise hit the shelves on April 14th 2015, with both AMD and NVIDIA in tow to help optimize the title. GTA doesn’t provide graphical presets, but opens up the options to users and extends the boundaries by pushing even the hardest systems to the limit using Rockstar’s Advanced Game Engine under DirectX 11. Whether the user is flying high in the mountains with long draw distances or dealing with assorted trash in the city, when cranked up to maximum it creates stunning visuals but hard work for both the CPU and the GPU.

For our test we have scripted a version of the in-game benchmark. The in-game benchmark consists of five scenarios: four short panning shots with varying lighting and weather effects, and a fifth action sequence that lasts around 90 seconds. We use only the final part of the benchmark, which combines a flight scene in a jet followed by an inner city drive-by through several intersections followed by ramming a tanker that explodes, causing other cars to explode as well. This is a mix of distance rendering followed by a detailed near-rendering action sequence, and the title thankfully spits out frame time data.

GTX 980: Grand Theft Auto V, Average FPSGTX 980: Grand Theft Auto V, 95th Percentile

F1 2018

Aside from keeping up-to-date on the Formula One world, F1 2017 added HDR support, which F1 2018 has maintained; otherwise, we should see any newer versions of Codemasters' EGO engine find its way into F1. Graphically demanding in its own right, F1 2018 keeps a useful racing-type graphics workload in our benchmarks.

Aside from keeping up-to-date on the Formula One world, F1 2017 added HDR support, which F1 2018 has maintained. We use the in-game benchmark, set to run on the Montreal track in the wet, driving as Lewis Hamilton from last place on the grid. Data is taken over a one-lap race.

GTX 980: F1 2018, Average FPSGTX 980: F1 2018, 95th Percentile

CPU Performance, Short Form Overclocking
Comments Locked

39 Comments

View All Comments

  • Calin - Monday, October 25, 2021 - link

    And if your soldered-on SSD breaks, you need to replace the entire device.

    I'm using an HP 8200 (I think) with third generation i3 and - originally - a 320 (I think) GB hdd.
    It runs with 3TB plus 1TB plus one 120GB SSD.
    With 320GB only of storage, I would have thrown it long ago.
  • Robberbaron12 - Wednesday, October 27, 2021 - link

    I expect this is the future for "mobile" CPUs, a mega SOC with Ram and a SSD soldered on and then everything else connected over PCI-E
  • Person5e9 - Friday, October 22, 2021 - link

    Can someone, preferably asrock or gigabyte, please make an x570s m-atx. Lots of people would buy one in this underserved category for the smaller size and greater expansion (RAM and slots). Thanks!
  • TheinsanegamerN - Saturday, October 23, 2021 - link

    Why? B550 already exists, so you get PCIe 4.0 for a M.2 SSD and the GPU. You dont get more RAM slots with X570 VS B550.

    Is having 4.0x1 slots that important?
  • Calin - Monday, October 25, 2021 - link

    4.0 1x slots might be more valuable than 4.0 x16 slots, as most computers won't come even close to filling up a 3.0 x16 slot.
  • ipkh - Sunday, October 24, 2021 - link

    What's with the crappy Tidepods++ graphic for?
    It's rather crass and shouldn't be there as it has nothing to do with the article.
  • Harry_Wild - Sunday, October 31, 2021 - link

    All these board manufacturers should concentrate on the itx size motherboards for the mini PC cases, 12" X 7" X 10". Boards are 6.7" X 6.7" in size!
  • atragorn - Sunday, November 14, 2021 - link

    If there was sufficient demand they would be doing so already. Most people view these things colored by their own needs or desires, What I want or need is what everyone wants/needs. Which is simply not true. If most people wanted ITX systems the store shelves would be FULL of ITX systems.
    Whats on the shelves is what most people want/need. When that changes so will they. They do a lot of research to find out what they should be making. Hint its what people will buy.
  • dailyprimenews - Tuesday, December 28, 2021 - link

    https://todayprimenews.com/
    https://todayprimenews.com/world-news/
    https://todayprimenews.com/sports-news/

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now