Package Improvements

As we move to smaller process nodes, the thermal density of high-performance silicon becomes more of an issue, and so all the processor companies put resources into their mechanical design teams to come up with a solution for the best thermal performance but also comes in line with costs. For example, we’ve seen Intel over the years transition from a soldered down heatspreader, to liquid metal, to basic thermal paste (because saving 0.1 cents means a lot across 70m CPUs), and then all the way back again when customers started demanding it.

However, in that time, we’ve pretty much kept the same socket design for mainstream processors. There hasn’t been much emphasis on changing the design itself for thermomechanical improvements in order to retain reuse and compatibility. There have been some minor changes here and there, such as substrate thinning, but nothing that substantial. The move to a new socket for Alder Lake now gives Intel that opportunity.

For Alder Lake, Intel is using an optimized packaging process to reduce the amount of soldered thermal material used in the processors. Combining that with a thinner die, and Intel is having to increase the thickness of the heatspreader to maintain the required z-height for the platform. The idea here is that the limiting factor in the cooling solution is any time we have a thermal interface, from one material to another – in this case, die to solder, and solder to heatspreader. Solder is the weak point here, so if the heatspreader gets thicker to meet the die, then less solder is needed.

Ultimately direct-die liquid cooling would be the boon here, but Intel has to come up with a solution that fits millions of processors. We have seen Intel offer different packaging solutions based on the SKU itself, so it will be interesting if the mid-range still get the Thin Die + Thin STIM treatment, or if they’ll go back to the cheap thermal paste.

Overclocking: We Have Headroom

It wouldn’t be too much of a leap to say that for most users, the only useful overclocking they might want to look at is enabling XMP on their memory. Modern processors these days are so close to their actual voltage and thermal limits out of the box these days that even if there was 200-300 MHz to gain, especially for the top Core i9 parts, it wouldn’t be worth the +100W it produces. I’m also getting to an age now where I prefer a good stable system, rather than eking out every frame, but having lived in the competitive OC scene for a while, I understand the drive that a lot of those users have to go above and beyond. To that end, Intel is introducing a few new features, and reviving some old ones, for Alder Lake.

Alder Lake also complicates things a bit with the P-core and E-core design.

To start, all the cores on the K/KF parts can be overclocked. The P-cores can be overclocked individually, whereas the E-cores are in groups of four. All the E-cores can be disabled, but at least one P-core needs to be enabled for the system to work (this has interesting consequences for Intel’s design). All cores can have additional AVX offsets, per-core ratio and voltage controls, and the ring/uncore ratios can also be adjusted. Memory also has the bells and whistles mentioned on a previous page. Those with integrated graphics can also be adjusted.

What Alder Lake brings back to the table is BCLK overclocking. For the last decade or so, most overclocking is done with the CPU multiplier, and before that it was BCLK or FSB. Intel is now saying that BCLK overclocking has returned, and this is partly due to motherboard customizations in the clock generator. Every Alder Lake CPU has an internal BCLK/clock generator it can use, however motherboard vendors can also apply an external clock generator. Intel expects only the lowest-end motherboards will not have an external generator.

The use of two generators allows the user to overclock the PCIe bus using the external generator, while maintaining a regular BCLK on other parts of the system with the internal clock. The system can also apply voltage in an adaptive way based on the overclock, with additional PLL overrides.

On top of this, Intel is integrating more user-accessible telemetry for its cores, particularly the E-cores, and real-time frequency analysis. On top of this, users can adjust the memory frequency in the operating system, rather than having to reboot – this is an extension of the memory turbo functionality previously mentioned.

For regular users, Intel is also offering a one-click immediate overclock feature. On launch, the Core i9 will be supported and overclock the P-cores +100 MHz and the E-cores +300 MHz immediately. It sounds like Intel is confident that all CPUs will be able to do this, but they want it to be user selectable. Beyond that, I confirmed the tool does still void the warranty. Intel’s VP dismissed it as an issue, citing that the recent overclocker warranty program they canned had such a low pickup, it wasn’t worth continuing. I’d say that the two things are mutually exclusive, but that’s up to Intel.

DDR5: Detailed Support, XMP, Memory Boost Performance and Conclusions
Comments Locked

395 Comments

View All Comments

  • Freeb!rd - Thursday, October 28, 2021 - link

    The problem with the MSRP listed for these processors is that at MicroCenter all the Intel SKUs are going for $40-60 HIGHER than MSRP, while the AMD SKUs are going for $40-60 LOWER than MSRP.
  • nandnandnand - Thursday, October 28, 2021 - link

    AMD Zen 3 prices were above MSRP for a long time. Maybe give this a week?

    And certainly don't go pre-ordering these before the reviews are out.
  • WaltC - Thursday, October 28, 2021 - link

    Newegg today selling pre-orders of the 12900 for ~$649, IIRC...;) Hard to believe they'd sell any--but judging by some posts here, I can't rule it out...;)

    Z690 mboards are all pre-order, too.
  • Flying Aardvark - Thursday, October 28, 2021 - link

    Looks like AMD will continue sucking on it. Intel never lost the AAA (or overall) gaming crown. That will continue on. One day AMD will overtake in something that's not CSGo. Just don't hold your breath.
  • Qasar - Thursday, October 28, 2021 - link

    you should hold your breath, as you are wrong, most reviews show and state that intel lost everything but the gaming crown with Zen 2 and lost the gaming crown with zen 3, the reviews show and state this.
  • Flying Aardvark - Saturday, October 30, 2021 - link

    I disproved you on that lie with benchmarks. You're just the typical fanboy that doesn't know what he's looking at and believes everyone that parrots falsehoods just because Zen3 does win in some titles. Good for AMD, but they didn't take the gaming crown. Never once did AMD beat Intel in the majority of titles.
  • Qasar - Sunday, October 31, 2021 - link

    " I disproved you on that lie with benchmarks " no you didnt, you disproved nothing.
    " You're just the typical fanboy that doesn't know what he's looking at and believes everyone that parrots falsehoods just because Zen3 does win in some titles " hello pot, meet kettle. you base your whole argument on a geomean ranking, when IF you were to look at the reviews of each cpu them selves, you would see quite the opposite.
  • Flying Aardvark - Monday, November 1, 2021 - link

    I proved that you don't know what you're talking about because you're not up to date on MCE/ABT and the impact of that on early reviews. My argument is based on the truth. The average consists of individual titles. You have a pretty dumb argument.
  • Qasar - Monday, November 1, 2021 - link

    as do you. point is
  • Flying Aardvark - Monday, November 1, 2021 - link

    Seems like you're out of things to say and just angry now. Enjoy being stupid.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now