The GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master: A Quick Recap

Click here for the full review

The Z590 Aorus Master, in terms of the Aorus branded models, sits just below GIGABYTE's flagship Z590 Xtreme and Xtreme WaterForce models. The GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Tachyon is specifically designed for extreme overclockers and maximizing overclocking performance with Rocket Lake, but this puts that model in a vaulted segment with a small handful of other Z590 models. The GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master includes three full-length PCIe slots, with the top two operating at PCIe 4.0 x16 and x8/x8, while the third slot is locked down to PCIe 3.0 x1. In the top right-hand corner of the board are four memory slots, with support for up to DDR4-5400 out of the box and a total combined capacity of 128 GB.

 

Storage options on the Z590 Master include three M.2 slots, including one PCIe 4.0 x4, two with support for both PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA M.2 drives, and six SATA ports. The board also has many premium controllers, including a high-end Aquantia AQC107 10 GbE controller, an Intel AX210 Wi-Fi 6E CNVi, and a Realtek ALC1220-VB and ESS Sabre ESS9118 audio controller pairing. GIGABYTE includes a single USB 3.2 G2x2 Type-C port on the rear panel, with an impressive five USB 3.2 G2 Type-A ports and four USB 3.2 G1 Type-A ports also on the rear panel.

GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master Key Overclocking Variables

Some of the main features to consider on the GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master include:

  • Large 19-phase power delivery operating at 9+1 (doubled design)
  • 2 x 8-pin 12 V ATX CPU power inputs
  • Large and dense passive VRM heatsinks
  • Support for DDR4-5400 out of the box

Dissecting the large 19-phase power delivery, the Z590 Aorus Master uses an Intersil ISL69269 PWM controller operating at 9+1. The CPU section includes eighteen premium Intersil ISL99390 90 A power stages, which are doubled up with nine Intersil ISL6617A doublers. Looking at the SoC section, GIGABYTE is using a single Vishay SiC651 50 A power stage. It should be noted that the GIGABYTE has the largest power delivery of the four models we are testing in this article.


The 19-phase power delivery on the GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master (operating at 9+1)

Keeping the power delivery cool is a large and heavy two-part VRM heatsink that is interconnected by a single heat pipe. Both heatsinks are using copious amounts of aluminum fins designed to catch and direct passive airflow in the case, which is designed to improve the overall heat dissipation properties of the design. 

GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master Firmware for Overclocking: Tweaker

The GIGABYTE firmware is consistent throughout its Aorus branded models with two modes for users to select between; the 'Easy' model for novice users and an 'Advanced' mode for the more experienced. GIGABYTE also has a basic yet functional-looking BIOS, consisting of a black background with white text and orange accents.

All of the overclocking options and settings are within the Tweaker menu, which can be found in the Advanced mode. The relevant options are listed in one large menu, with CPU frequency at the top, memory options in the middle, and voltage/power-related settings towards the bottom. Users looking to overclock the processor can simply enter or select the desired CPU Clock ratio from a dropdown menu and enter the required CPU VCore voltage. For users looking to overclock the memory, kits with built-in X.M.P 2.0 profiles can be enabled very simply, or users can overclock memory manually with options for frequency and various latency options.

Within the Advanced CPU Settings menu, users can disable AVX workloads and set custom CPU over-temperature protection variables, which in the case of the Master, it goes up to 115°C. There are also options to enable Intel's Turbo Boost technologies, disable C-States, and also manage different power-related functions of Intel's Rocket Lake processors. GIGABYTE has one of the best visuals for Loadline Calibration options, with multiple profiles to select between depending on how aggressive the CPU overclock may be.

Despite looking archaic compared to other vendors' firmware, the GIGABYTE Aorus UEFI BIOS is clean, easy to navigate, and use. There's a tonne of options for users to tweak both the CPU and memory with everything needed to push Rocket Lake on all types of cooling under one menu, aptly named Tweaker.

Getting a baseline on stability and maximum all-core frequencies using the GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master, we achieved the following:

Achieved Stable Overclock on Each Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i9-11900K Sample Achieved All-Core
CPU Frequency
Achieved
CPU VCore
Voltage (V)
Chip #1 - Batch V051F933 5.1 GHz 1.330 V
Chip #2 - Batch V051F933 5.1 GHz 1.350 V
Chip #3 - Batch V051F933 5.1 GHz 1.350 V
Chip #4 - Batch X101J374 5.1 GHz 1.370 V

Using the GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master to overclock our CPUs, we did have issues getting any of the four Core i9-11900K's to 5.2 GHz without lots of performance reducing thermal throttling. This is despite increasing the temperature limits to 115°C and removing any throttling constraints. Anything over 1.420 V proved too hot for the board to handle. As we highlighted in our full review (link at the top of the page), the power delivery design seems to dump a lot of heat into the power plane instead of dissipating it, which is the likely culprit here.

In our VRM thermal testing during our full review of the board, we got the following results with the GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master with Chip #1 at 5.1 GHz with 1.450 V:

  • VRM Sensor Temp: 78°C
  • VRM Probe 1: 74°C
  • VRM Probe 2: 77°C
  • Ambient Temp: 24°C

Despite encompassing a large and premium design, the VRM thermal testing on the GIGABYTE Z590 Aorus Master did highlight what we see as a slight design flaw. Typically when keeping a power delivery cool, the heatsinks job is to dissipate as much thermal load from the components, but what we saw was essentially a heat dump into the board's power plane. The passively cooled design on the surface looks good, but we felt GIGABYTE could have done a better job on the design and implementation of the power delivery and heatsink. The extra heat dumped into the power plane around the CPU socket could be one of the reasons we only managed to achieve 5.1 GHz all-core on all of our chips during testing.

The ASUS ROG Maximus XIII Hero The MSI MEG Z590 Ace
Comments Locked

54 Comments

View All Comments

  • yeeeeman - Tuesday, August 31, 2021 - link

    don't wanna be closed in an ecosystem
  • ikjadoon - Monday, August 30, 2021 - link

    424 W under peak nT overclocked load. Those VRMs were earning their stripes!

    53W per core. Per core!

    Is there a reason besides voltage why Chip #3 significantly beat Chips #1, 2 in POV-Ray + Cinebench R23 nT + GB5 nT on the Z590 HERO ? All were 5.2 GHz. Higher voltage = better clock stability?

    //

    Is it a typo or a really good deal on the first page chart at the bottom—i9-11900K to be $374, though earlier written as $545.
  • ceomrman - Monday, August 30, 2021 - link

    This is a great article, nice work! The gains are very modest, but more surprising to me was how variable they were. As a consumer buying top-shelf parts, you could easily end up with worse overclocked performance than you'd get at stock settings with a different random CPU and/or expensive, high quality motherboard. Even for uses that would benefit from overclocking, there are very specific configuration choices to navigate. That's not to mention that the kind of tasks that would benefit from absolute max multi-core performance are noticeable faster on a Ryzen or even on older Intel HEDT chips with more cores, anyway. The 11900K is for gaming. Overclocking it yields no gaming improvement. So yeah, don't bother.
  • mode_13h - Monday, August 30, 2021 - link

    > using current average US energy prices, assuming the system was at full-load for the
    > full duration, 10 hours a day over 300 days a year equates to an extra $41 in energy bills.

    Please specify what figure you're using for "current average US energy prices". They vary by a lot (in terms of location, time of day (for some), and time of year).

    Also, it'd be worth noting that you're not taking into account additional A/C costs. During the winter, some might not need air conditioning, although electric heat is nearly always more expensive that gas or oil (making this an inefficient substitute). However, during the summer, if the A/C is already taxed, the marginal increase in power utilization is probably nonlinear.

    Although this sort of matrix testing sheds a little light into variations between boards and CPUs, you should probably use multiple samples of each board to draw any strong inferences about them. More importantly, I think a greater number of readers would be better-served by doing a proper GPU review.
  • mode_13h - Monday, August 30, 2021 - link

    BTW, when estimating energy costs, did you account for PSU losses? If we assume the PSU is 80+ Platinum and running near full-load, it'd amount to another 11% or so.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, August 30, 2021 - link

    "The average electricity rate is 13.19 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh)."

    https://www.electricchoice.com/electricity-prices-...
  • Dug - Monday, August 30, 2021 - link

    "map provides a good representation"
    Well every site has different averages, so it's misleading.

    And most are done by location, not by population. So 100 people paying 9cents and 1 million paying 13cents averages out to 11cents. Which isn't a realistic average.
  • mode_13h - Tuesday, August 31, 2021 - link

    I typically pay about twice that.

    And if we consider the case of Texas, they typically have lower energy prices. However, during peak-demand season, the spot price really shoots up. During the summer, A/C is so essential that people there will cut back on food expenditures before they completely forego air-conditioning.
  • Wrs - Monday, August 30, 2021 - link

    Or you could back-calculate what kWh rate they were assuming. I suspect a miscalculation somewhere by the quoted… In any case, a TEC is horribly inefficient for substantial active load, and in this case rather ineffective due to being undersized. 200w for 88 C at approx. 300w heat load? Just get a faster water pump to beat that with ambient liquid cooling. Electric cost would be pennies on the dollar!
  • thestryker - Monday, August 30, 2021 - link

    It sure seems like some sort of adaptive core overclocking would be key on these processors. On my 6800k, and now 6900k, I definitely have my overclock set for 2 and all cores just to keep the voltage down, but gain extra clockspeed for lightly threaded. It's not perfect, but assuming this type of setup works on z590 properly it would at the very least keep that stock boost if not allow for higher.

    In general from what I've read regarding both AMD and Intel's recent processors though it just seems like overclocking for a daily driver just isn't particularly worth it. Maybe with the upcoming ADL there'll be something extra to squeeze out of the E cores, but otherwise the future sure seems like minimal OC gains.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now