New DSU-110 L3 & Cluster: Massively More Bandwidth

Alongside the new CPU microarchitectures, Arm today is also announcing a new L3 design in the form of the new DSU-110. The “DynamIQ Shared Unit” had been the company’s go-to cluster and “core complex” block ever since it was introduced in 2017 with the Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55. While we’ve seen small iterative improvements, today’s DSU-110 marks a major change in how the DSU operates and how it promises to scale up in cache size and bandwidth.

The new DSU-110 is a ground-up redesign with an emphasis on more bandwidth and more power efficiency. It continues to be the core building block for all of Arm’s mobile and lower tier market segments.

A key metric is of course the increase of L3 cache configuration which will now go up to 16MB this generation. This is of course the high-end of the spectrum and generally we shouldn’t expect such a configuration in a mobile SoC soon, but Arm has had several slides depicting larger form-factor implementations using such a larger design housing up to 8 Cortex-X2 cores. This is undoubtedly extremely interesting for a higher-performance laptop use-case.

The bandwidth increase of the new design is also significant, and applies from single-thread to multi-threaded scenarios. The new DSU-110 promises aggregate bandwidth increases of up to 5x compared to the contemporary design. More interesting is the fact that it also significantly boosts single-core bandwidth, and Arm here actually notes that the new DSU can actually support more bandwidth than what’s actually capable of the new core microarchitectures for the time being.

Arm never really disclosed the internal topology of the previous generation DSU, but remarks that with the DSU-110 the company has shifted over to a bi-directional dual-ring transport topology, each with four ring-stops, and now supporting up to 8 cache slices. The dual-ring structure is used to reduce the latencies and hops between ring-stops and in shorten the paths between the cache slices and cores. Arm notes that they’ve tried to retain the same lower access latencies as on the current generation DSU (cache size increases aside), so we should be seeing very similar average latencies between the two generations.

Parallel access increases for bandwidth as well as more outstanding transactions seem to have been also very important in order to improve performance, which seems very exciting for upcoming SoC designs, but also puts into more question the previously presented CPU IPC improvements and exactly how much the new DSU-110 contributes to those numbers.

Architecturally, one important change to the capabilities of the DSU-110 is support for MTE tags, a upcoming security and debugging feature promising to greatly help with memory safety issues.

The new DSU can scale up to 4x AMBA CHI ports, meaning we’ll have up to 1024-bit total bi-directional bandwidth to the system memory. With a theoretical DSU clock of around 2GHz this would enable bandwidth of up to 256GB/s reads or writes, or double that when combined, plenty enough to be able to saturate also eventual high-end laptop configurations.

In terms of power efficiency, the new DSU offers more options for low-power operation when in idle situations, implementing partial L3 power-down, able to reduce leakage power of up to 75% compared to the current DSU.

In general idle situations but still having the full L3 powered on, the new design promises up to 25% reduction in leakage power all whilst offering 2x the bandwidth capabilities.

It’s important to note that we’re talking about leakage power here- active dynamic power is expected to generally scale linearly with the bandwidth increase of the new design, meaning 5x the bandwidth would also cost 5x the power. This would be an important factor to note into system power and in general the expected power behaviour of the next-gen SoCs when they’re put under heavy memory workloads.

Arm describes the DSU-110 as the backbone of the Armv9 cluster and that seemingly seems to be an apt description. The new bandwidth capabilities are sure to help out both with single-threaded, but also with multi-threaded performance of upcoming SoCs. Generally, the new 16MB L3 capability, while it’s possible somebody might do a high-end laptop SoC configuration, isn’t as exciting as the now finally expected move to a new 8MB L3 on mobile SoCs, hopefully also enabling higher power efficiency and more battery life for devices.

The Cortex-A510: Brand-new Little Design Comes in Pairs A new CI-700 Coherent Interconnect & NI-700 NoC For SoCs
Comments Locked

181 Comments

View All Comments

  • eastcoast_pete - Tuesday, May 25, 2021 - link

    Would be great to see QC roll out new, ARM-based but home-made cores again; however, even if they do, the custom designs will most likely be big cores, which get paired with the 510s. But, maybe QC proves me wrong. That would be nice.
  • nandnandnand - Tuesday, May 25, 2021 - link

    "Because the new complex also only takes up a single interface on the DSU, it also opens up the possibility of designs larger than 8 “cores”, something I hope won’t happen, or hopefully only happens through more middle or big cores."

    Nah, I want a 24-core smartphone posthaste.
  • Kamen Rider Blade - Tuesday, May 25, 2021 - link

    There's no point in putting 24-cores in a SmartPhone, other than to drain your battery faster.

    At the highest end, I think 12-cores in a Top of the line ARM CPU is enough for SmartPhone purposes with this configuration:

    2x BIG; 8x Balanced; 2x little cores.

    That would be enough for most power users to get everything they need out of their CPU's.
  • spaceship9876 - Tuesday, May 25, 2021 - link

    It would be nice if they released a cortex-A35 successor as that is very old.
  • nandnandnand - Tuesday, May 25, 2021 - link

    Plus it could fulfill the efficiency role that A510 apparently fails at.
  • mode_13h - Wednesday, May 26, 2021 - link

    If they're going to continue with that product segment, then ARMv9 will virtually force them to.
  • mode_13h - Tuesday, May 25, 2021 - link

    Can anyone explain the color splotches in the floorplan plots? What are we supposed to glean from those?
  • vvid - Wednesday, May 26, 2021 - link

    >> Can anyone explain the color splotches in the floorplan plots?
    Each color marks specific unit: ALU, FPU, Instruction Decode, Branch predictor, Load/Store, etc
  • mode_13h - Thursday, May 27, 2021 - link

    Thank you!
  • Kamen Rider Blade - Tuesday, May 25, 2021 - link

    So we went from ARM's big.LITTLE

    I prefer the BIG.little stylization.

    to

    BIG.Balanced.little as the new paradigm between ARM Core Types.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now